공익사업 편입토지 등기이전 특례법 제정방안 = A plan for enacting the Act on Special Act on land Acquisition about Public Utilities

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The modern land ownership system is started with the administrative order of land investigation by the bureau of land investigation of japanese Empire in 1912 between 1918. The lands which are forfeited by japanese empire are transferred to japanese through dong yang company at a low price. since Korea Independence from Japan, japanese Empire’s property right is finally transferred to korean government by U. S. Military Administration.
At that time the person who loses his property right is not recompensed for his property loss. A property right under public works is not clear because The registry offices about 59 were destroyed in the Korean War and compensation books were missed at flood before land registry had not been completed. moreover, the purchase of land act has violated the korean constitution and has been void. deposits for expropriation of land according to the purchase of land act is leaved as it was.
If The Government should take a action for deposits, The Government should sue against a land owner for land acquisite.
Is there no way to settle the matter out of court? land that has not been transferred after compensation in the 1980s as mentioned above, referring to the fact that under the Special Measures for Real Estate Registration Act, a certificate of confirmation can be issued to the true owner and an application for registration can be made independently, registration transfer is allowed through this, and ownership becomes owned by the state and local governments.
Although there are regional restrictions for individuals under the Special Measures for Real Estate Registration Act, registration is permitted through administrative procedures if true ownership is proven, regardless of whether a register is organized or not. Although it is difficult to prove transaction relationships between individuals, a method of registration is allowed through the administrative procedure of issuing a confirmation certificate. There is a need to protect citizens' rights and achieve a litigation economy by having the state or local governments acquire ownership and preparing a plan to separately dispute citizens who raise objections to it in the future.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "헌법재판소 2015. 6. 25. 선고 2014헌바404 결정"

2 "헌법재판소 1995. 11. 30. 선고 94헌가2호 결정"

3 김성욱, "한국의 토지소유제도의 변천과정과 통일문제" 2010

4 "한국사연구의 회고와 전망"

5 이기백, "한국사신론" 일조각 1999

6 조석곤, "토지조사업사업에 있어서 소유권 조사과정에 관한 한 연구 – 김해군의 사례를 중심으로-" 경제사학회 1986

7 전영길 ; 이성익, "토지조사사업을 통한 일제의 토지수탈사례연구" 19 (19): 2017

8 남기현, "토지조사령에 규정된 사정과 소유권 확정의 차이" 성균관대학 2019

9 조명래, "토지공개념 이상과 현실" 한울엠플러스 (23) : 2005

10 "중요공개기록물 해설집 V – 국세청･성업공사편(1950~1980)"

11 "중부일보"

12 "재미동포를 위한 한국법 가이드"

13 김병록, "이승만농지개혁과교육개혁" 사단법인 한국국가법학회 19 (19): 2023

14 "연합뉴스"

15 "수원지방법원 2021. 2. 9.선고 가소35711 판결"

16 "민법주해〔Ⅴ〕" 박영사 2007

17 "대법원전원합의체 1986. 6. 10. 선고 84다카1773판결"

18 "대법원 2019. 10. 31 선고 2019다213368, 213375 판결"

19 "대법원 2014. 3. 27. 선고 2010다94731, 94748 판결"

20 "대법원 2010. 11. 11., 선고, 2010다45944, 판결"

21 "대법원 2000. 3. 16 선고 97다37661 전원합의체 판결"

22 "대법원 1997. 8. 21 선고 95다28625 전원합의체 판결"

23 "대법원 1997. 5. 23 선고 95다46654, 46661 판결"

24 "대법원 1996. 11. 15. 선고 96다32812 판결"

25 "대법원 1962. 11. 22. 선고 62다623 판결"

26 "귀속재산불하 집필자 유광호"

27 "건설산업신문"