RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    디지털환경에서 의료결정권 보장을 위한 헌법적 대응 = Constitutional Responses to Ensuring Healthcare Decision-Making Rights in a Digital Environment

    한글로보기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    With the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and information and communication technology (ICT), there have been notable changes in the healthcare system. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have brought about a paradigm shift in the healthcare system. During this period, Korea experienced limited telehealth, and expectations for the introduction of telehealth grew. The medical industry is shifting its focus from disease treatment to prevention and management, diversifying into data industries, AI, and mobile healthcare through smart devices. Personalized medicine is expanding into specialized medical fields.
    Under the Korean Constitution, the right to life and health is a fundamental right based on the state's obligation to the right to health in Article 36(3), the right to human dignity and pursuit of happiness in Article 10, the right to bodily lierty and safety in Articles 12 and 13, and the right to a decent life in Article 34(1). However, the state's obligation to protect fundamental rights must be judged in accordance with the level of medical care at the time and the level of health environment that meets the life and physical security of the people according to the changes of the times. In this regard, the state's duty to protect fundamental rights should not be limited to reactively preventing risks from diseases, but should also extend to respecting the right of individuals to patient autonomy.
    In this regard, constitutionally, the state's legal policies related to the life, body, and health of citizens need to be reviewed with greater scrutiny under the current principle of non-disproportionate protection, and the state's duty of protection needs to be adjusted upward to meet the needs of a risk society. And, medical and health services in the digital environment are public goods that affect both individuals and the state, and at the same time, they are areas where utilitarianism is recognized to benefit the medical community, the medical equipment industry, and individuals. Therefore, in order to activate digital healthcare services, including telehealth, it is necessary to gradually define the concept of non-telemedicine, reimbursement policies, and immunity regulations for medical personnel in consideration of medical environment practices and technology utilization.
    번역하기

    With the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and information and communication technology (ICT), there have been notable changes in the healthcare system. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have brought about a paradigm shif...

    With the recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and information and communication technology (ICT), there have been notable changes in the healthcare system. In particular, the COVID-19 pandemic seems to have brought about a paradigm shift in the healthcare system. During this period, Korea experienced limited telehealth, and expectations for the introduction of telehealth grew. The medical industry is shifting its focus from disease treatment to prevention and management, diversifying into data industries, AI, and mobile healthcare through smart devices. Personalized medicine is expanding into specialized medical fields.
    Under the Korean Constitution, the right to life and health is a fundamental right based on the state's obligation to the right to health in Article 36(3), the right to human dignity and pursuit of happiness in Article 10, the right to bodily lierty and safety in Articles 12 and 13, and the right to a decent life in Article 34(1). However, the state's obligation to protect fundamental rights must be judged in accordance with the level of medical care at the time and the level of health environment that meets the life and physical security of the people according to the changes of the times. In this regard, the state's duty to protect fundamental rights should not be limited to reactively preventing risks from diseases, but should also extend to respecting the right of individuals to patient autonomy.
    In this regard, constitutionally, the state's legal policies related to the life, body, and health of citizens need to be reviewed with greater scrutiny under the current principle of non-disproportionate protection, and the state's duty of protection needs to be adjusted upward to meet the needs of a risk society. And, medical and health services in the digital environment are public goods that affect both individuals and the state, and at the same time, they are areas where utilitarianism is recognized to benefit the medical community, the medical equipment industry, and individuals. Therefore, in order to activate digital healthcare services, including telehealth, it is necessary to gradually define the concept of non-telemedicine, reimbursement policies, and immunity regulations for medical personnel in consideration of medical environment practices and technology utilization.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 강의성 ; 최종권, "현행법상 원격의료의 허용범위에 관한 법적 고찰" 17 (17): 2015

    2 이영석, "헬스케어 산업 기술시장분석" 한국과학기술정보연구원 2017

    3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

    4 이준일, "헌법학강의" 홍문사 2023

    5 계희열, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2004

    6 홍성방, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2015

    7 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2021

    8 장영수, "헌법학" 홍문사 2020

    9 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2019

    10 한수웅, "헌법재판의 한계 및 심사기준" 8 : 1997

    1 강의성 ; 최종권, "현행법상 원격의료의 허용범위에 관한 법적 고찰" 17 (17): 2015

    2 이영석, "헬스케어 산업 기술시장분석" 한국과학기술정보연구원 2017

    3 권영성, "헌법학원론" 법문사 2010

    4 이준일, "헌법학강의" 홍문사 2023

    5 계희열, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2004

    6 홍성방, "헌법학(중)" 박영사 2015

    7 성낙인, "헌법학" 법문사 2021

    8 장영수, "헌법학" 홍문사 2020

    9 한수웅, "헌법학" 법문사 2019

    10 한수웅, "헌법재판의 한계 및 심사기준" 8 : 1997

    11 고인석, "헌법상 기본권으로서의 안전권 보장에 관한 연구" (41) : 2023

    12 전광석, "한국헌법론" 집현재 2016

    13 허영, "한국헌법론" 박영사 2022

    14 이종구, "포스트 코로나 시대에 있어서 원격의료 도입을 위한 법적 과제" 32 (32): 2022

    15 이한주 ; 엄주희, "포스트 코로나 19시대에 디지텔 헬스케어 발전의 법적 과제" 30 (30): 2022

    16 최용전 ; 엄주희, "코로나 –19 팬데믹에서의 원격의료와 의료윤리" 98 : 2022

    17 김중권, "인공지능시대에 완전자동적 행정행위에 관한 소고" 66 (66): 2020

    18 이희옥, "인공지능 의사결정에서의 이익조정과 이원적 규제모델에 관한 연구" 행정법이론실무학회 2020

    19 의료문제를 생각하는 변호사 모임, "의료법 주석서" 박영사 2020

    20 제20대 대통령직인수위원회, "윤석열정부 110대 국정과제"

    21 울리히 벡, "위험사회 : 새로운 근대(성)을 향하여" 새물결 1997

    22 이한주, "원격의료제도 현실화 문제와 개선방안" 26 (26): 2018

    23 김범준, "원격의료의 활성화를 위한 보험제도의 개선과제" (56) : 2016

    24 임지연 ; 김진숙, "원격의료 관련 입법 논의 현황과 향후 과제" 25 (25): 2022

    25 이상경, "생활안전과 재해예방을 위한 국가책무의 규범적 고찰" 67 (67): 2018

    26 보건복지부, "비대면진료 시범사업 보완방안 시행"

    27 김대중, "비대면 진료 국내 현황 및 국외 사례:일본과 프랑스를 중심으로" 2023

    28 박종현, "보건권의 헌법적 의미 : 복지국가 실현을 이끄는 역동적 인권" 9 (9): 2015

    29 삼일 PwC 경영연구원, "디지털 헬스케어의 개화 –원격의료의 현주소-" PwC Korea 2022

    30 보건산업진흥원, "디지털 헬스케어 산업 분석 및 전망연구" 2020

    31 임은정, "디지털 헬스케어 관련 이슈 동향 탐색 -‘소비자’를 중심으로-" 기업소비자전문가협회 (130) : 2023

    32 방승주, "독일 연방헌법재판소의 입법자에 대한 통제의 범위와 강도" 7 : 1996

    33 조윤재, "기후 변화와 인권" 43 (43): 2019

    34 박지용, "공중보건법학의 개념과 이념적 기초" 2014

    35 Mersini Paschou, "easyHealthApps: e-Health Apps dynamic generation for smartphones & tablets" 37 (37): 2013

    36 J.Y.Lee, "Trends and Implications of Digital Healthcare" National IT Industry Promotion Agency 2019

    37 Samuel Warren, "The Right to Privacy" 193 (193): 1890

    38 백경화 ; 하은아, "Mobile-based Digital Healthcare Platforms : Smart Wellness" 4 (4): 2021

    39 Leroy Hood, "A personal view on systems medicine and the emergence of proactive P4 medicine: predictive, preventive, personalized and participatory" 29 (29): 2012

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼