RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    지방공공재의 공공성의 측정

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76359535

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    For more than some decades the non-publicness of goods provided by local governments has been attempted to find out that how much they are public or non-public. Recent studies of local public good provision report publicness parameter estimates about one, which is indicating that the local public goods seems to have private good characteristics. It is argued that the observed values of the publicness parameters have no normative significance as to the merits of public versus private provision. If the local public good was a pure public good, the publicness parameter would take on a value of zero; progressively larger values for local public goods indicate that they are private goods. Using the original Bergstrom and Goodman model and South Korea data, this paper shows that there is high evidence of publicness in fire fighting service, but there is even less evidence of publicness in culture, social security, environmental management, road reconstruction. That is to say, some of the local public goods seem to be private goods. Household elasticity of expenditure is the main variable in publicness parameter determination. This paper also contends a measurement problem i.e. so called the zoo effect has led to upwardly biased estimates of the degree to which local public goods are subjected to publicness. Further more, supply size and subfunctions of local public goods enable to get more plausible estimates of their publicness.
    번역하기

    For more than some decades the non-publicness of goods provided by local governments has been attempted to find out that how much they are public or non-public. Recent studies of local public good provision report publicness parameter estimates about ...

    For more than some decades the non-publicness of goods provided by local governments has been attempted to find out that how much they are public or non-public. Recent studies of local public good provision report publicness parameter estimates about one, which is indicating that the local public goods seems to have private good characteristics. It is argued that the observed values of the publicness parameters have no normative significance as to the merits of public versus private provision. If the local public good was a pure public good, the publicness parameter would take on a value of zero; progressively larger values for local public goods indicate that they are private goods. Using the original Bergstrom and Goodman model and South Korea data, this paper shows that there is high evidence of publicness in fire fighting service, but there is even less evidence of publicness in culture, social security, environmental management, road reconstruction. That is to say, some of the local public goods seem to be private goods. Household elasticity of expenditure is the main variable in publicness parameter determination. This paper also contends a measurement problem i.e. so called the zoo effect has led to upwardly biased estimates of the degree to which local public goods are subjected to publicness. Further more, supply size and subfunctions of local public goods enable to get more plausible estimates of their publicness.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 재화의 유형적 특성과 공공성 측정이론
    • Ⅲ. 연구설계
    • Ⅳ. 경험적 분석결과와 해석
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • Ⅰ. 서론
    • Ⅱ. 재화의 유형적 특성과 공공성 측정이론
    • Ⅲ. 연구설계
    • Ⅳ. 경험적 분석결과와 해석
    • Ⅴ. 결론
    • 참고문헌
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 박용치, "공공관리와 민간관리 in: 논문집 24" 서울시립대학교 85-105, 1990

    2 박용치, "공공경비규모의 결정요인 분석 in: 논문집 4" 한국방송통신대학 299-318, 1995

    3 Craig,S.G, "Urban Safety in Vancouver:Allocation and Production of a Congestible Public Goods" 22 : 867-884, 1989

    4 Cornes,R, "The Theory of Externalities,Public Goods and Club Goods,3rd ed" Cambridge University Press 2003

    5 Cornes, R, "The Theory of Externalities,Public Goods and Club Goods,2nd ed" Cambridge University Press 1996

    6 Samuelson,P.A., "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure" 36 (36): 387-389, 1954

    7 Antosen,Marianne, "The Publicness of the Organizations" 75 : 337-357, 1997

    8 McMillan,M.L, "The Publicness of Local Public Goods:Evidence from Ontario Municipalities" 14 (14): 596-608, 1981

    9 Craig,S.G., "The Impact of Congestion on Local Public Good Production" 32 : 331-353, 1987

    10 Borchering,T.E, "The Effects on Public Spending of the Divisibility of Public Outputs in Consumption, Bureaucratic Power, and the Size of Tax Sharing in Budgeting and Bureaucrat: The Sources of Government Growth" Duke University Press 211-228, 1977

    1 박용치, "공공관리와 민간관리 in: 논문집 24" 서울시립대학교 85-105, 1990

    2 박용치, "공공경비규모의 결정요인 분석 in: 논문집 4" 한국방송통신대학 299-318, 1995

    3 Craig,S.G, "Urban Safety in Vancouver:Allocation and Production of a Congestible Public Goods" 22 : 867-884, 1989

    4 Cornes,R, "The Theory of Externalities,Public Goods and Club Goods,3rd ed" Cambridge University Press 2003

    5 Cornes, R, "The Theory of Externalities,Public Goods and Club Goods,2nd ed" Cambridge University Press 1996

    6 Samuelson,P.A., "The Pure Theory of Public Expenditure" 36 (36): 387-389, 1954

    7 Antosen,Marianne, "The Publicness of the Organizations" 75 : 337-357, 1997

    8 McMillan,M.L, "The Publicness of Local Public Goods:Evidence from Ontario Municipalities" 14 (14): 596-608, 1981

    9 Craig,S.G., "The Impact of Congestion on Local Public Good Production" 32 : 331-353, 1987

    10 Borchering,T.E, "The Effects on Public Spending of the Divisibility of Public Outputs in Consumption, Bureaucratic Power, and the Size of Tax Sharing in Budgeting and Bureaucrat: The Sources of Government Growth" Duke University Press 211-228, 1977

    11 Hirsh,W.Z., "The Economics of State and Local Government" McGraw-Hill 1970

    12 Borchering,T.E, "The Demand for the Services of Non-federal Government" 62 : 891-901, 1972

    13 Bozeman,B, "The 'Publicness Puzzle' in Organization Theory:A Test of Alternative Explanations of Differences between Public and Private Organizations" 4 (4): 197-223, 1994

    14 Tullock,Gordon, "Public Goods,Redistribution and Rent Seeking" Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. 2005

    15 Reiter,M, "Public Goods,Club Goods,and the Measurement of Crowding" 46 : 69-79, 1999

    16 Birulin,Oleksii, "Public Goods with Congestion" 129 : 289-299, 2006

    17 Bergstrom,T.C, "Private Demand for Public Goods" 63 : 280-296, 1973

    18 Oates,Wallace E., "On the Measurement of Congestion in the Provision of Local Public Goods" 24 : 85-94, 1988

    19 Schmandt,H.J, "Measuring Municipal Outputs" 13 : 369-375, 1960

    20 Pommerehne,W.W., "Institutional Approaches to the Public Expenditure:Empirical Evidence from Swiss Municipalities" 9 : 255-280, 1978

    21 Edwards,J.H., "Indivisibility and Preference for Collective Provision" 22 : 559-577, 1992

    22 Edwards,J.H., "Congestion Function Specification and the ‘Publicness’ of Local Public Goods" 27 : 80-96, 1990

    23 Brueckner,J.K., "Congested Public Goods:The Case of Fire Protection" 15 : 45-58, 1981

    24 Reiter,M, "Are Public Goods Public? A Critical Survey of the Demand Estimates for Local Public Services" 54 : 374-408, 1997

    25 Buchanan,J.M., "An Economic Theory of Clubs" 32 (32): 1-14, 1965

    26 Bozeman,B, "All Organization Are Public:Bridging Public and Private Organization Theory" Jossey-Bass 32-37, 1987

    27 Inman,R.P., "A Generalized Congestion Function for Highway Travel" 5 : 21-34, 1978

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.17 1.17 1.31
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.26 1.18 1.419 0.42
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼