『논어』를 통해 본 유학의 창의성 = The Creativity of Confucianism through The Analysts

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

We need creative talent not only in science but also in economics, technology, art, politics and so on. The humanities is no exception. Confucian education research also highlights the need to develop and utilize ways to cultivate creative talent, and emphasizes education that combines creativity and human nature.
However, our society's perception of confucianism's creativity is skeptical. In the extreme sense, it is easy to hear the remarks that Confucianism, Confucian idea, and Confucian education have blocked progress of our society and led to the eradication of creativity.
In this paper, the tendency to view 'separation from confucianism' as progress is a different form of decline. So I look for the possibility that Confucianism and creativity can be linked without interfering. It also reveals that the positive action between confucianism and creativity is an opportunity for progress that leads to more desirable human relationships and social behaviors, leading to social development and harmony.
I don't want to say that the scriptures of Confucianism are the sum of truth that can explain and solve everything in life. And I don't want to say that Confucianism can not have creativity and contact in its native way due to the New Wisdom, a traditional way of seeking knowledge[wenguzhixin(溫故知新)]. However, in order to compromise or compromise an important statement held by one another, there must be a sense of principle proposition and engagement that both sides recognize.
Therefore, in this paper, I propose the proposition that both sides must acknowledge together, that 'all creativity and creativity are discovered and realized in a relationship' and a new 'sensation of forming a relationship.' This reveals the possibility of a coexistence between Confucianism and Creativity. To carry out these studies, an interpretation will be attempted, mainly based on examples from The Analects and references related literature. As a result, the paper reveals that Confucianism is not a history of repetition but a history of struggle for individuality, which showed excellence in the development of moral creativity.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이에스더, "창의적 융합인재교육(STEAM)을 위한 예술교육의 의미와 당위성에 대한 논의" 한국문화교육학회 8 (8): 125-144, 2013

2 미하이 칙센트미하이, "창의성의 즐거움" 북로드 2003

3 하워드 블룸, "집단정신의 진화" 파스칼북스 2003

4 "중용"

5 "주역"

6 아리스토텔레스, "정치학" 도서출판숲 2014

7 "전습록"

8 필립 아이반호, "유학 우리 삶의 철학" 동아시아 2008

9 박균섭, "유교와 창의성의 역학" 창조교육학회 14 : 2012

10 멜린다 데이비스, "욕망의 진화" 21세기북스 2003

11 마이클 미칼코, "아무도 생각하지 못하는 것 생각하기" 푸른솔 2003

12 신정근, "신유교윤리의 ‘동반성’에 대한 현대적 해석" 성균관대학교출판부 2017

13 Edward de Bono, "수평적 사고와 창의성" 서원 1995

14 노명우, "세상물정의 사회학" 사계절 2014

15 허만하, "비는 수직으로 서서 죽는다" 솔 2000

16 "맹자"

17 로저 에임즈, "동양철학, 그 삶과 창조성" 성균관대학교출판부 2005

18 "논어"

19 신정근, "공자씨의 유쾌한 논어" 사계절 2009

20 이시우, "『주역』의 사생관에 관한 연구" 성균관대학교 대학원 2013

21 신정근, "‘의지’와 ‘앎’ 문제의 대두­-『논어 』「술이 」30 해석을 중심으로" 동양철학연구회 38 : 179-201, 2004

22 "http://www.dictionary.com/browse/creativity"

23 Thomas Cleary, "The Essential Confucius - The Heart of Confucius' Teachings in Authentic I Ching Order" CASTLE BOOKS 1998