As we can see above I researched most of the existing thesisses as possible as I could. I could find that there had been plenty of studies about Sisa(詩社) and those studies achieved high qualities as well in spite of the short time. However, I also...
As we can see above I researched most of the existing thesisses as possible as I could. I could find that there had been plenty of studies about Sisa(詩社) and those studies achieved high qualities as well in spite of the short time. However, I also could find some problems why existing Sisa studies can not stay in there. The first point is that we still can`t solve the problems presented by Seng Bum-zhung(成範重) when he fist started his study about Sisa. He said; In this writing I defined characteristics of Yuhang literature(委巷文學) through Song Seck-won Sisa(松石園詩社), but this work will not end until we look through the whole shape of Yuhang literature including literary activity of Song Seck-won Sisa. Even though I didn`t utter here, there must be an analysis about the relationships among traditional free verse, pansori(판소리), masque and so on which were literatures done by the same class as someone who were in charge of Yuhang Literature. The second point is that how we limit the range of Sisa study. There still be a problem whether we make it narrow or wide. If we make it narrow, we could restrict our study only under the name of Sisa. Then how we deal with all the temporary Sisa under the name of Sisa could be a problem.