일제강점기 재조일본인(在朝日本人)의 시조번역 양상과 그 의미 -細井肇(호소이 하지메)의 『통속조선문고』를 중심으로- = Period of Japanese occupation, Japanese in colonial Korea`s sijo translation and that meaning -Focusing on the Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇)`s 『Tongsok-Joseon-Mungo』-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This research is for looking into Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇)`s translation aspects of 『Namhun-taepyeongga』 embedded in 『Tongsok-Joseon-Mungo』 This study stemmed from reflection of the negative evaluation of Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇)`s translation work about Joseon literature. This article, therefore, is just for looking into only translation aspects about sijo, excluding prejudice against Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇)`s negative translating viewpoint. To take a look at Hosoi-Hajime`s translation aspects about sijo, examining Okakura-Yoshisaburo(岡倉由三郞)`s translation aspects was needed in advance. The result brought a clear distinction in terms of paying much attention on translating pattern of sijo in Okakura-Yoshisaburo(岡倉由三郞)`s translation. Then, defined Namhun-taepyeongga which Hosoi-Hajime aimed to translate as Namhun-taepyeongga(Ha). Formational features were firstly conscious sequence and the criterion for selecting work was how well the song showed Koreans` emotion. Secondly, we have looked into translation aspects divided by Chinese characters and colloquial style, separation, ellipsis and alteration. As a result, We could find that Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇) tried to translate sijo in a japanese`s unity of speech and writing way. Ultimately, we have concluded that Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇) did not translate sijo to show negative thinking of Joseon people. However, we have examined not only significance of translation but also its errors and limitations. Most of the errors were attributed to mistranslation of the original work. Also we have drawn that this limitation cannot be used as an evidence for negative evaluation about Hosoi-Hajime(細井肇).