RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    韓國과 日本에서의 相對國 敎育硏究 分析 = A Comparative Analysis of Studies of the Counterpart's Education in Korea and Japan

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76388010

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This thesis is an attempt to analyze the studies of the counterpart's education in Japan and Korea since 1945.
    The characteristics of their educational studies are, so to speak, the differences between Koreans and Japanese. That is to say, it is difficult to tell the differences on the surface, but we can identify them when we look further into the educational studies in the two countries. The differences are reflected in the characteristics of the nations, relationships with other countries, social conditions, and the trends of academic circles. The main characteristics are as follows.
    1) Except for the doctoral theses, the Japanese began studying Korean education earlier than Koreans began researching Japanese education. The number of studies on Korean education in Japan is greater than the number of studies on Japanese education in Korea. The method of collecting materials and their domains also started to diversify earlier in Japan than in Korea.
    2) Japanese education researchers studied Korean education for the purpose of understanding foreign countries rather than educational reform, but Korean education researchers studied Japanese education so that they could improve their present conditions.
    3) The methods of collecting materials in Japan are less apt to be recorded clearly than in Korea. It is common to Korea and Japan that the method referring to sundry records is used il10re frequently in studies by a researcher than in joint researches.
    4) Japanese researchers are more apt to study developing countries as compared with Korean researchers.
    5) Most research reports in Korea are made up of a foreword, introduction, main body. and conclusion while in Japan, they consist of only an introduction and main body.
    6) Korean researchers publish the results of their research mostly through books
    and reports, but Japanese researchers present the results of their studies mostly in journals.
    7) The main three areas of educational research studied in Korea are curriculum.
    guide of students' learning. subject, educational] administration. finance, and lifelong education while the ones in Japan are educational administration. finance, curriculum . guide of students' learning. subject, and investigation of the ways of thinking or the sense of value.
    8) In comparison, the Japanese researchers show a stronger their studies on a long term basis than Korean researchers.
    The following recommendations based on this analysis tendency to continue are offered for the improvement of studies of the counterpart's education in Korea and Japan.
    First, Korean and Japanese researchers should work together in their educational studies. After comparing the two reports made by Koreans and Japanese separately, they should make a final report.
    Second, dormitories at the universities which have international exchange programs should be offered to the investigators, who ha\'e come from their home country in order that they can stay in their counterpart's country and conduct field surveys.
    Third, it is desirable that a scientific society established with comparative educational studies distribute their journals to institutes and academic societies in foreign countries as well as the purpose of comparative educational studies. the aim of activating universities, research their own country for Fourth, it is necessary to have bilingual Korean and Japanese researchers. Fifth, we need to not only learn the language of the counterpart's country, but also to understand the characteristics of the nation through academic exchange and cultivating close relationships with the researchers of the counterpart's country,
    Sixth, there is apt to be a fixed idea that developing countries are immature, and that advanced nations precede other countries, but we should not think that we can not learn anything from other developing countries,
    Seventh, comparativ
    번역하기

    This thesis is an attempt to analyze the studies of the counterpart's education in Japan and Korea since 1945. The characteristics of their educational studies are, so to speak, the differences between Koreans and Japanese. That is to say, it i...

    This thesis is an attempt to analyze the studies of the counterpart's education in Japan and Korea since 1945.
    The characteristics of their educational studies are, so to speak, the differences between Koreans and Japanese. That is to say, it is difficult to tell the differences on the surface, but we can identify them when we look further into the educational studies in the two countries. The differences are reflected in the characteristics of the nations, relationships with other countries, social conditions, and the trends of academic circles. The main characteristics are as follows.
    1) Except for the doctoral theses, the Japanese began studying Korean education earlier than Koreans began researching Japanese education. The number of studies on Korean education in Japan is greater than the number of studies on Japanese education in Korea. The method of collecting materials and their domains also started to diversify earlier in Japan than in Korea.
    2) Japanese education researchers studied Korean education for the purpose of understanding foreign countries rather than educational reform, but Korean education researchers studied Japanese education so that they could improve their present conditions.
    3) The methods of collecting materials in Japan are less apt to be recorded clearly than in Korea. It is common to Korea and Japan that the method referring to sundry records is used il10re frequently in studies by a researcher than in joint researches.
    4) Japanese researchers are more apt to study developing countries as compared with Korean researchers.
    5) Most research reports in Korea are made up of a foreword, introduction, main body. and conclusion while in Japan, they consist of only an introduction and main body.
    6) Korean researchers publish the results of their research mostly through books
    and reports, but Japanese researchers present the results of their studies mostly in journals.
    7) The main three areas of educational research studied in Korea are curriculum.
    guide of students' learning. subject, educational] administration. finance, and lifelong education while the ones in Japan are educational administration. finance, curriculum . guide of students' learning. subject, and investigation of the ways of thinking or the sense of value.
    8) In comparison, the Japanese researchers show a stronger their studies on a long term basis than Korean researchers.
    The following recommendations based on this analysis tendency to continue are offered for the improvement of studies of the counterpart's education in Korea and Japan.
    First, Korean and Japanese researchers should work together in their educational studies. After comparing the two reports made by Koreans and Japanese separately, they should make a final report.
    Second, dormitories at the universities which have international exchange programs should be offered to the investigators, who ha\'e come from their home country in order that they can stay in their counterpart's country and conduct field surveys.
    Third, it is desirable that a scientific society established with comparative educational studies distribute their journals to institutes and academic societies in foreign countries as well as the purpose of comparative educational studies. the aim of activating universities, research their own country for Fourth, it is necessary to have bilingual Korean and Japanese researchers. Fifth, we need to not only learn the language of the counterpart's country, but also to understand the characteristics of the nation through academic exchange and cultivating close relationships with the researchers of the counterpart's country,
    Sixth, there is apt to be a fixed idea that developing countries are immature, and that advanced nations precede other countries, but we should not think that we can not learn anything from other developing countries,
    Seventh, comparativ

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.한국과 일본에서의 상대국 연구
    • Ⅲ.한국과 일본에서의 상대국 교육연구의 추이
    • Ⅳ.상대국 교육연구 목적 및 방법
    • Ⅴ.상대국 교육연구 영역 및 연구물의 종류
    • Ⅰ.서론
    • Ⅱ.한국과 일본에서의 상대국 연구
    • Ⅲ.한국과 일본에서의 상대국 교육연구의 추이
    • Ⅳ.상대국 교육연구 목적 및 방법
    • Ⅴ.상대국 교육연구 영역 및 연구물의 종류
    • Ⅵ.상대국 교육연구 주관 기관 및 연구 참여자
    • Ⅶ.결론
    • 참고문헌
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼