의미간의 유사도 연구의 패러다임 변화의 필요성-인지 의미론적 관점에서의 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Semantic similarity/relatedness measure between two concepts plays an important role in research on system integration and database integration. Moreover, current research on keyword recommendation or tag clustering strongly depends on this kind of semantic measure. For this reason, many researchers in various fields including computer science and computational linguistics have tried to improve methods to calculating semantic similarity/relatedness measure.
This study of similarity between concepts is meant to discover how a computational process can model the action of a human to determine the relationship between two concepts. Most research on calculating semantic similarity usually uses ready-made reference knowledge such as semantic network and dictionary to measure concept similarity. The topological method is used to calculated relatedness or similarity between concepts based on various forms of a semantic network including a hierarchical taxonomy. This approach assumes that the semantic network reflects the human knowledge well. The nodes in a network represent concepts, and way to measure the conceptual similarity between two nodes are also regarded as ways to determine the conceptual similarity of two words(i.e,. two nodes in a network). Topological method can be categorized as node-based or edge-based, which are also called the information content approach and the conceptual distance approach, respectively. The node-based approach is used to calculate similarity between concepts based on how much information the two concepts share in terms of a semantic network or taxonomy while edge-based approach estimates the distance between the nodes that correspond to the concepts being compared. Both of two approaches have assumed that the semantic network is static. That means topological approach has not considered the change of semantic relation between concepts in semantic network.
However, as information communication technologies make advantage in sharing knowledge among people, semantic relation between concepts in semantic network may change. To explain the change in semantic relation, we adopt the cognitive semantics. The basic assumption of cognitive semantics is that humans judge the semantic relation based on their cognition and understanding of concepts. This cognition and understanding is called ‘World Knowledge.’ World knowledge can be categorized as personal knowledge and cultural knowledge. Personal knowledge means the knowledge from personal experience. Everyone can have different Personal Knowledge of same concept. Cultural Knowledge is the knowledge shared by people who are living in the same culture or using the same language. People in the same culture have common understanding of specific concepts. Cultural knowledge can be the starting point of discussion about the change of semantic relation. If the culture shared by people changes for some reasons, the human’s cultural knowledge may also change. Today’s society and culture are changing at a past face, and the change of cultural knowledge is not negligible issues in the research on semantic relationship between concepts.
In this paper, we propose the future directions of research on semantic similarity. In other words, we discuss that how the research on semantic similarity can reflect the change of semantic relation caused by the change of cultural knowledge. We suggest three direction of future research on semantic similarity. First, the research should include the versioning and update methodology for semantic network. Second, semantic network which is dynamically generated can be used for the calculation of semantic similarity between concepts. If the researcher can develop the methodology to extract the semantic network from given knowledge base in real time, this approach can solve many problems related to the change of semantic relation. Third, the statistical approach based on corpus analysis can be an alternative for the metho

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 조인동, "소셜 네트워크와 데이터 마이닝 기법을 활용한 학문 분야 중심 및 융합 키워드 추천 서비스" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 127-138, 2011

2 김현우, "상황 온톨로지를 이용한 동적 의사결정시스템" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 43-61, 2011

3 Resnik, P., "Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy" 20 (20): 448-453, 1995

4 Lobner, Sebastian, "Understanding Semantics" Arnold 2002

5 Ogden, C. K., "The meaning of meaning : A study of the influence of language upon thought and of the science of symbolism" Harcourt Brace Jovanovich 1923

6 Saeed, J. I., "Semantics(Introducing Linguistics)" Wiley-Blackwell 2003

7 박진수, "Semantic Search : A Survey" 한국지능정보시스템학회 17 (17): 19-36, 2011

8 Rada, R., "Ranking documents with a thesaurus" 40 (40): 304-310, 1989

9 Rosch, E. H., "Natural categories" 4 : 328-350, 1973

10 Couto, F. M., "Measuring semantic similarity between Gene Ontology terms" 61 (61): 137-152, 2007

11 Rada, R., "Development and application of a metric on semantic nets" 19 (19): 17-30, 1989

12 Holland, D., "Cultural models in language and thought" Cambridge University Press 1987

13 Rosch, E. H., "Cognitive Reference Points" 7 : 532-547, 1975

14 Lin, D., "An information-theoretic definition of similarity" 1 : 296-304,