RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    제조업 현장의 안전교육이 중대재해대응역량에 미치는 영향: 안전성과와 안전문화의 직렬다중매개효과 = The Effects of Safety Education in Manufacturing Workplaces on Major Disaster Response Capability: A Serial Mediation Analysis of Safety Performance and Safety Culture

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T17545698

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study aimed to examine the effect of safety education on major disaster response capability among industrial workers, and to clarify the mediating roles of safety performance and safety culture in this relationship. In addition, the study investigated whether the levels of the key variables differed according to industry type, work experience, and the number of employees at the workplace. For this purpose, data were collected from 371 workers employed in the machinery and metal, shipbuilding and automobile, chemical and food, and other industrial sectors. To examine differences in the variables according to industry type, work experience, and workplace size, a one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted. Correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationships among the variables. Finally, a serial multiple mediation analysis using the PROCESS Macro was conducted to verify whether safety education influences major disaster response capability sequentially through safety performance and safety culture. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, regarding differences by industry type, safety education was higher in the chemical and food sector and the shipbuilding and automobile sector than in the machinery and metal sector and the other industrial sectors, and the post-hoc tests confirmed significant differences between these sectors and the machinery and metal sector. Safety performance was highest in the chemical and food sector, with a significant difference found between the chemical and food sector and the machinery and metal sector. Safety culture was also highest in the chemical and food sector, and the post-hoc tests showed that the chemical and food sector and the shipbuilding and automobile sector were significantly higher than the machinery and metal sector. Major disaster response capability was likewise highest in the chemical and food sector, with a significant difference from the machinery and metal sector. Second, with respect to work experience, safety education was highest among workers with less than one year of experience, and the post-hoc test revealed a significant difference from the group with 10 to less than 20 years of experience. In contrast, no significant differences by work experience were found for safety performance, safety culture, or major disaster response capability. Third, with respect to the number of employees, safety education was highest in workplaces with 1,000 or more employees, and the post-hoc test indicated significant differences between this group and the groups of 50 to fewer than 100 employees and fewer than 1,000 employees. However, no significant differences by workplace size were found for safety performance, safety culture, or major disaster response capability. Fourth, the correlation analysis among safety education, safety performance, safety culture, and major disaster response capability yielded coefficients ranging from .445 to .995, indicating strong positive correlations among the variables. Fifth, the analysis of direct effects showed that safety education had significant direct effects on safety performance, safety culture, and major disaster response capability. Safety performance had a significant direct effect on safety culture, and safety culture had a significant direct effect on major disaster response capability. However, the direct effect of safety performance on major disaster response capability was not significant. Sixth, the mediation analysis showed that the simple mediating effect of safety performance in the relationship between safety education and major disaster response capability was not significant, whereas the simple mediating effect of safety culture was significant. Furthermore, the serial multiple mediation analysis confirmed that safety education influenced major disaster response capability sequentially through safety performance and safety culture; that is, safety performance affected major disaster response capability via safety culture, demonstrating a significant serial multiple mediating effect. These results indicate that safety culture functions as a key mediating mechanism in the process through which safety education leads to major disaster response capability, and that safety performance affects major disaster accident response capability not on its own but through safety culture. Keywords: safety education, safety performance, safety culture, major disaster response capability
    번역하기

    This study aimed to examine the effect of safety education on major disaster response capability among industrial workers, and to clarify the mediating roles of safety performance and safety culture in this relationship. In addition, the study investi...

    This study aimed to examine the effect of safety education on major disaster response capability among industrial workers, and to clarify the mediating roles of safety performance and safety culture in this relationship. In addition, the study investigated whether the levels of the key variables differed according to industry type, work experience, and the number of employees at the workplace. For this purpose, data were collected from 371 workers employed in the machinery and metal, shipbuilding and automobile, chemical and food, and other industrial sectors. To examine differences in the variables according to industry type, work experience, and workplace size, a one-way analysis of variance(ANOVA) and post-hoc tests were conducted. Correlation analysis was performed to identify the relationships among the variables. Finally, a serial multiple mediation analysis using the PROCESS Macro was conducted to verify whether safety education influences major disaster response capability sequentially through safety performance and safety culture. The main findings of this study are as follows. First, regarding differences by industry type, safety education was higher in the chemical and food sector and the shipbuilding and automobile sector than in the machinery and metal sector and the other industrial sectors, and the post-hoc tests confirmed significant differences between these sectors and the machinery and metal sector. Safety performance was highest in the chemical and food sector, with a significant difference found between the chemical and food sector and the machinery and metal sector. Safety culture was also highest in the chemical and food sector, and the post-hoc tests showed that the chemical and food sector and the shipbuilding and automobile sector were significantly higher than the machinery and metal sector. Major disaster response capability was likewise highest in the chemical and food sector, with a significant difference from the machinery and metal sector. Second, with respect to work experience, safety education was highest among workers with less than one year of experience, and the post-hoc test revealed a significant difference from the group with 10 to less than 20 years of experience. In contrast, no significant differences by work experience were found for safety performance, safety culture, or major disaster response capability. Third, with respect to the number of employees, safety education was highest in workplaces with 1,000 or more employees, and the post-hoc test indicated significant differences between this group and the groups of 50 to fewer than 100 employees and fewer than 1,000 employees. However, no significant differences by workplace size were found for safety performance, safety culture, or major disaster response capability. Fourth, the correlation analysis among safety education, safety performance, safety culture, and major disaster response capability yielded coefficients ranging from .445 to .995, indicating strong positive correlations among the variables. Fifth, the analysis of direct effects showed that safety education had significant direct effects on safety performance, safety culture, and major disaster response capability. Safety performance had a significant direct effect on safety culture, and safety culture had a significant direct effect on major disaster response capability. However, the direct effect of safety performance on major disaster response capability was not significant. Sixth, the mediation analysis showed that the simple mediating effect of safety performance in the relationship between safety education and major disaster response capability was not significant, whereas the simple mediating effect of safety culture was significant. Furthermore, the serial multiple mediation analysis confirmed that safety education influenced major disaster response capability sequentially through safety performance and safety culture; that is, safety performance affected major disaster response capability via safety culture, demonstrating a significant serial multiple mediating effect. These results indicate that safety culture functions as a key mediating mechanism in the process through which safety education leads to major disaster response capability, and that safety performance affects major disaster accident response capability not on its own but through safety culture. Keywords: safety education, safety performance, safety culture, major disaster response capability

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 6
    • 3. 용어의 정의 7
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
    • Ⅰ. 서 론 1
    • 1. 연구의 필요성 및 목적 1
    • 2. 연구 문제 6
    • 3. 용어의 정의 7
    • Ⅱ. 이론적 배경 10
    • 1. 제조업의 개념 및 특징 10
    • 2. 안전교육 12
    • 3. 안전성과 25
    • 4. 안전문화 31
    • 5. 중대재해대응역량 43
    • Ⅲ. 연구 방법 59
    • 1. 연구절차 59
    • 2. 연구대상 60
    • 3. 조사도구 62
    • 4. 분석방법 75
    • Ⅳ. 연구 결과 77
    • 1. 제조업 현장의 안전교육, 안전성과, 안전문화, 중대재해대응역량의 기술통계
    • 2. 제조업 현장의 배경변인(산업군, 근무경력, 근무인원)에 따른 안전 교육, 안전성과, 안전문화, 중대재해대응역량의 차이 79
    • 3. 제조업 현장의 안전교육, 안전성과, 안전문화, 중대재해대응역량 간의 상관관계 92
    • 4. 제조업 현장의 안전교육과 중대재해대응역량 간의 관계에서 안전 성과와 안전문화의 직렬다중매개효과 검증 95
    • Ⅴ. 결론 및 시사점 102
    • 1. 논의 및 결론 102
    • 2. 시사점 108
    • 3. 연구의 한계 및 후속 연구 제안 113
    • 참고문헌 116
    • 부록 128
    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    해외이동버튼