RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      주거환경이 행복감에 미치는 영향 - 충남지역을 사례로 - = The Effect of Residential Environments on Happiness - the Case of Chungnam Province -

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103852319

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      As in other advanced countries, Korea has recently experienced high rate of suicide together with rapid economic growth. It is meaningful to empirically analyze the effect of residential environments as determinants of happiness because the ultimate goal of policies is to enhance people's happiness. This study empirically analyzes the effect of residential environments on happiness through two-step regression analysis on Chungnam Social Survey. In the first step we explain personal happiness as a function of the fixed effects of individual residence (i.e., Eup, Myun, and Dong) as well as personal characteristics, and in the second step average happiness of each residence captured in the first step where personal characteristics are controlled for is explained by residential environments of Eup, Myun, or Dong in question. This study finds that individual person's happiness is affected mainly by the relationship with other family members, household income, employment status as well as the person's own characteristics. Empirical results in the second step suggest that, rather than physical factors, social network (e.g., trust on neighbors) and environmental pollution are important, and these results imply that the effectiveness of current policies focusing on build-up of infrastructures could be restricted at least in terms of increasing people's happiness.
      번역하기

      As in other advanced countries, Korea has recently experienced high rate of suicide together with rapid economic growth. It is meaningful to empirically analyze the effect of residential environments as determinants of happiness because the ultimate g...

      As in other advanced countries, Korea has recently experienced high rate of suicide together with rapid economic growth. It is meaningful to empirically analyze the effect of residential environments as determinants of happiness because the ultimate goal of policies is to enhance people's happiness. This study empirically analyzes the effect of residential environments on happiness through two-step regression analysis on Chungnam Social Survey. In the first step we explain personal happiness as a function of the fixed effects of individual residence (i.e., Eup, Myun, and Dong) as well as personal characteristics, and in the second step average happiness of each residence captured in the first step where personal characteristics are controlled for is explained by residential environments of Eup, Myun, or Dong in question. This study finds that individual person's happiness is affected mainly by the relationship with other family members, household income, employment status as well as the person's own characteristics. Empirical results in the second step suggest that, rather than physical factors, social network (e.g., trust on neighbors) and environmental pollution are important, and these results imply that the effectiveness of current policies focusing on build-up of infrastructures could be restricted at least in terms of increasing people's happiness.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 구재선, "한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가?" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 143-166, 2011

      2 임근식, "지역주민의 삶의 질 인식과 영향요인에 관한 연구 - 강원도 시․군을 중심으로-" 10 (10): 47-89, 2012

      3 한겨레 뉴스, "자살률 지역별‘최고 4배차’ ․․․ 어떤 차이이길래"

      4 서은국, "단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 95-113, 2011

      5 이재현, "공동주택 거주자의 주거만족도 결정 요인에 관한 연구 - 전북지역을 중심으로 -" 한국주거환경학회 10 (10): 231-244, 2012

      6 김용진, "개인-환경 적합성 모델을 이용한 노인의 주거만족도 및 거주의사 분석" 한국주거환경학회 11 (11): 51-62, 2013

      7 Winkelmann, L., "Why Are the Unemployed So Unhappy? Evidence from Panel Data" 65 : 1-15, 1998

      8 Boarini, R., "What Makes for a Better Life?: The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in OECD Countries - Evidence from the Gallup World Poll" OECD 2012

      9 Helliwell, J., "Weekends and Subjective Well-Being" National Bureau of Economic Research 2011

      10 Lucas, R., "Unemployment Alters the Set Point for Life Satisfaction" 15 (15): 8-13, 2004

      1 구재선, "한국인, 누가 언제 행복한가?" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 143-166, 2011

      2 임근식, "지역주민의 삶의 질 인식과 영향요인에 관한 연구 - 강원도 시․군을 중심으로-" 10 (10): 47-89, 2012

      3 한겨레 뉴스, "자살률 지역별‘최고 4배차’ ․․․ 어떤 차이이길래"

      4 서은국, "단축형 행복 척도(COMOSWB) 개발 및 타당화" 한국사회및성격심리학회 25 (25): 95-113, 2011

      5 이재현, "공동주택 거주자의 주거만족도 결정 요인에 관한 연구 - 전북지역을 중심으로 -" 한국주거환경학회 10 (10): 231-244, 2012

      6 김용진, "개인-환경 적합성 모델을 이용한 노인의 주거만족도 및 거주의사 분석" 한국주거환경학회 11 (11): 51-62, 2013

      7 Winkelmann, L., "Why Are the Unemployed So Unhappy? Evidence from Panel Data" 65 : 1-15, 1998

      8 Boarini, R., "What Makes for a Better Life?: The Determinants of Subjective Well-Being in OECD Countries - Evidence from the Gallup World Poll" OECD 2012

      9 Helliwell, J., "Weekends and Subjective Well-Being" National Bureau of Economic Research 2011

      10 Lucas, R., "Unemployment Alters the Set Point for Life Satisfaction" 15 (15): 8-13, 2004

      11 Krueger, A., "The Reliability of Subjective Well-Being Measures" 92 : 1833-1845, 2008

      12 Krout, J., "The Aged in Rural America" Greenwood 1986

      13 Diener, E., "Subjective Well-being" 95 : 542-575, 1984

      14 Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being: Three Decades of Progress" 125 : 276-302, 1999

      15 Schwarz, N., "Subjective Well-Being. An Interdisciplinary Perspective" Pergamon 27-47, 1991

      16 Sacks, W., "Subjective Well-Being, Income, Economic Development and Growth" National Bureau of Economic Research 2010

      17 Diener, E., "Subjective Well-Being and Age: An International Analysis" 17 : 304-324, 1997

      18 Easterlin, R., "Nations and Households in Economic Growth:Essays in Honour of Moses Abramovitz" New York Academic Press Inc 89-125, 1974

      19 Blanchflower, G., "Money, Sex and Happiness: An Empirical Study" 106 (106): 393-415, 2004

      20 Commission for Measuring Well-Being, "Measuring National Well-Being - Proposed Well-being Indicators" 2011

      21 Lucas, R., "Long-Term Disability Is Associated with Lasting Changes in Subjective Well-being: Evidence from Two Nationally Representative Longitudinal Studies" 92 (92): 717-730, 2007

      22 Helliwell, J., "Life Satisfaction and Quality of Development" National Bureau of Economic Research 2008

      23 Deanton, A., "Income, Health and Well-Being around the World: Evidence from the Gallup World Poll" 22 (22): 53-72, 2008

      24 Weidemann, S., "Human Behavior and Environment 8: Home Environments" Plenum 1985

      25 OECD, "How's Life?: Measuring well-being" OECD Publishing 2011

      26 Weinhold, D., "How Big a Problem Is Noise Pollution? A Brief Happiness Analysis by a Perturbable Economist" 2010

      27 Oswald, F., "Housing and Life Satisfaction of Older Adults in Two Rural Regions in Germany" 25 (25): 122-143, 2003

      28 Stevenson, B., "Economic Growth and Subjective Well-Being: Reassessing the Easterlin Paradox" 39 (39): 1-102, 2008

      29 Kahneman, D., "Developments in the Measurement of Subjective Well-Being" 20 (20): 3-24, 2006

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.8 0.8 0.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.868 0.25
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼