RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    Lexical Productivity of Korean EFL Learners in Spoken and Written English

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104801708

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research aims to investigate the lexical productivity of Korean students in their spoken and written English by comparing it with that of British students. Forty-two Korean and British students (21 per group) participated in this study and undertook the spoken and written tasks involving descriptive narratives. Approximately 32,000 words of English data were subsequently collected and examined in terms of the STTR and the occurrences of 15 lexical features using the WordSmith Tools 4.0 software and also by a manual investigation. The findings showed that, firstly, the Korean students underused more than half of the features analysed in their speech but they overused other six features in their writing, compared to the British students. The overused features signify that the Korean students might have been primarily exposed to highly limited and formulised English expressions. Secondly, the Korean students had better lexical productivity in writing than in speaking. This implies that their overall English proficiency might be better in writing than in speech. Lastly, the Korean students inappropriately used more than half of the lexical features between their speech and writing compared to the British students. This indicates that, to a degree, the Korean students might write as the native English speakers would speak, or vice versa.
    번역하기

    This research aims to investigate the lexical productivity of Korean students in their spoken and written English by comparing it with that of British students. Forty-two Korean and British students (21 per group) participated in this study and undert...

    This research aims to investigate the lexical productivity of Korean students in their spoken and written English by comparing it with that of British students. Forty-two Korean and British students (21 per group) participated in this study and undertook the spoken and written tasks involving descriptive narratives. Approximately 32,000 words of English data were subsequently collected and examined in terms of the STTR and the occurrences of 15 lexical features using the WordSmith Tools 4.0 software and also by a manual investigation. The findings showed that, firstly, the Korean students underused more than half of the features analysed in their speech but they overused other six features in their writing, compared to the British students. The overused features signify that the Korean students might have been primarily exposed to highly limited and formulised English expressions. Secondly, the Korean students had better lexical productivity in writing than in speaking. This implies that their overall English proficiency might be better in writing than in speech. Lastly, the Korean students inappropriately used more than half of the lexical features between their speech and writing compared to the British students. This indicates that, to a degree, the Korean students might write as the native English speakers would speak, or vice versa.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Edelsky, C., "Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of L1 and L2 texts" 16 (16): 211-228, 1982

    2 Gentner, D., "Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning, Language development" Hillsdale: Erlbaum 301-334, 1982

    3 Biber, D., "What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching?" 24 (24): 199-208, 2002

    4 Kennedy, G., "Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus, Using corpora to explore linguistic variation" Amsterdam: John Benjamins 73-90, 2002

    5 Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988

    6 Pawley, A., "Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency, Language and communication" London: Longman. 191-226, 1983

    7 Leki, I., "Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies" 25 (25): 123-143, 1991

    8 Altenberg, B., "The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing" 22 (22): 173-194, 2001

    9 Ellis, R., "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production" 24 (24): 1-27, 2003

    10 Ellis, R., "The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing" 26 (26): 59-84, 2004

    1 Edelsky, C., "Writing in a bilingual program: The relation of L1 and L2 texts" 16 (16): 211-228, 1982

    2 Gentner, D., "Why nouns are learned before verbs: Linguistic relativity versus natural partitioning, Language development" Hillsdale: Erlbaum 301-334, 1982

    3 Biber, D., "What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching?" 24 (24): 199-208, 2002

    4 Kennedy, G., "Variation in the distribution of modal verbs in the British National Corpus, Using corpora to explore linguistic variation" Amsterdam: John Benjamins 73-90, 2002

    5 Biber, D., "Variation across speech and writing" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1988

    6 Pawley, A., "Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency, Language and communication" London: Longman. 191-226, 1983

    7 Leki, I., "Twenty-five years of contrastive rhetoric: Text analysis and writing pedagogies" 25 (25): 123-143, 1991

    8 Altenberg, B., "The grammatical and lexical patterning of MAKE in native and non-native student writing" 22 (22): 173-194, 2001

    9 Ellis, R., "The effects of pre-task planning and on-line planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in L2 monologic oral production" 24 (24): 1-27, 2003

    10 Ellis, R., "The effects of planning on fluency, complexity, and accuracy in second language narrative writing" 26 (26): 59-84, 2004

    11 Lumley, T., "The effect of test-taker gender, audience and topic on task performance in tape-mediated assessment of speaking" 22 (22): 415-437, 2005

    12 Chalker, S., "The Oxford dictionary of English grammar" Oxford: Oxford University Press 1998

    13 Stubbs, M., "Text and corpus analysis: Computer-assisted studies of language and culture" Oxford: Blackwell 1996

    14 Uhm, C. J., "Temporal variables and fluency in Korean EFL students’ spoken discourse" 50 (50): 179-203, 1995

    15 Brown, G., "Teaching the spoken language: An approach based on the analysis of conversational English" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983

    16 Gass, S. M., "Second language acquisition: An introductory course" Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum 2001

    17 Zareva, A., "Relationship between lexical competence and language proficiency: Variable sensitivity" 27 (27): 567-595, 2005

    18 Biber, D., "Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting" 35 (35): 331-336, 2001

    19 SMU-MATE, "Photo News. Retrieved May 1, 2008, from"

    20 Tannen, D., "Oral and literate strategies in spoken and written narratives" 58 (58): 1-21, 1982

    21 Redeker, G., "On differences between spoken and written language" 7 : 43-55, 1984

    22 Ministry of Education, "Oegukeogwa gyoyukgwajeong (1) [Foreign languages curriculum]" Seoul, South Korea 1997

    23 D’Odorico, L., "Nouns and verbs in the vocabulary acquisition of Italian children" 34 : 891-907, 2007

    24 Longacre, R. E., "Narrative versus other discourse genre, Advances in tagmemics: North-Holland linguistic series 9" Amsterdam: North-Holland 1974

    25 Foster, P., "Measuring spoken language: A unit for all reasons" 21 (21): 354-375, 2000

    26 van Vlack, S. P., "MATE writing test rater training handbook" Seoul: Sookmyung Women’s University. (Unpublished) 2002

    27 van Vlack, S. P., "MATE rater training handbook" Seoul: Sookmyung Women’s University. (Unpublished) 2002

    28 Biber, D., "Longman grammar of spoken and written English" Essex: Pearson Education 1999

    29 Daller, H., "Lexical richness in the spontaneous speech of bilinguals" 24 (24): 197-222, 2003

    30 Nation, I. S. P., "Learning vocabulary in another language" New York: Cambridge University Press 2001

    31 Lennon, P., "Investigating fluency in EFL: A quantitative approach" 40 : 387-417, 1990

    32 Chafe, W. L., "Integration and involvement in speaking, writing, and oral literature, Spoken and written language: Exploring orality and literacy" Norwood, NJ: Ablex 35-53, 1982

    33 Ministry of Education, "Godeunghakgyo gyoyukgwageong haeseol 11: Oegukeo (yeongeo) [High school curriculum 11: Foreign languages (English)]" Seoul, South Korea 2000

    34 Itakura, H., "Gender and pragmatic transfer in topic development" 15 (15): 161-183, 2002

    35 Saville-Troike, M., "Extending “communicative” concepts in the second language curriculum: A sociolinguistic perspective, Culture as the core: Perspectives on culture in second language learning" Greenwich, CT: Information Age 3-17, 2003

    36 Hughes, R., "English in speech and writing: Investigating language and literature" London: Routledge 1996

    37 Biber, D., "Dimensions of register variation: A cross-linguistic comparison" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 1995

    38 Hunston, S., "Corpora in applied linguistics" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2002

    39 Beaman, K., "Coordination and subordination revisited: Syntactic complexity in spoken and written narrative discourse, Coherence in spoken and written discourse" Norwood, NJ: Ablex 45-80, 1984

    40 Wang, H.-S., "Contrastive rhetoric: A study on writing in L1 and L2" 6 : 35-57, 2000

    41 O’Grady, W., "Contemporary linguistics: An introduction (4th ed.)" Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s 2001

    42 Shirato, J., "Comparing English vocabulary in a spoken learner corpus with a native speaker corpus: Pedagogical implications arising from an empirical study in Japan" 11 (11): 393-412, 2007

    43 Baker, W., "Bilingual creativity, multidimensional analysis, and world Englishes" 18 (18): 342-357, 1999

    44 Read, J., "Accessing vocabulary" Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 2000

    45 Mohan, B. A., "Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors" 19 (19): 515-534, 1985

    46 Wales, K., "A dictionary of stylistics (2nd ed.)" Essex: Pearson Education 2001

    47 Quirk, R., "A comprehensive grammar of the English language" Essex: Addison Wesley Longman 1985

    48 Granger, S., "A bird’s eye view of learner corpus research,Computer learner corpora, second language acquisition and foreign language teaching" Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins 3-33, 2002

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.72 0.72 0.79
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.84 0.81 1.585 0.23
    더보기
    해외이동버튼