RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SCOPUS

    해양경계획정에서 지질 및 지형적요소의 효과에 관한 고찰 = The Role of Geological and Geomorphological Factors in the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104081372

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    A reference to natural prolongation appeared for the first time in the North Sea Judgement. Although it was not suggested that the concept of natural prolongation would automatically allow for the fixing of a continental shelf boundary, that concept encouraged States to request international tribunals to determine continental shelf boundaries on the basis of the geological and geomorphological features of the seabed. In the Libya v. Malta Case, however, the rejection of geological and geomorphological factors was total. Especially, Natural prolongation was the then checkmated as a relevant fact in delimitation between coasts situated less than 400 nm. apart. There can be no doubt that, in several disputed cases, prominent geomorphological variations are simply ignored ; nevertheless, there are also a few agreementswhere geological and geomorphological characteristics come into play and, to a certain extent, affect maritime boundaries. Physical characteristics of sea-bed are generally given serious consideration in the boundary delimitation such as the final negotiated boundary of the Australia-Indonesia Continental Shelf boundary Agreement(Timor and Arafura seas) which follows the continental slope bordering the Timor Trench.
    번역하기

    A reference to natural prolongation appeared for the first time in the North Sea Judgement. Although it was not suggested that the concept of natural prolongation would automatically allow for the fixing of a continental shelf boundary, that concept e...

    A reference to natural prolongation appeared for the first time in the North Sea Judgement. Although it was not suggested that the concept of natural prolongation would automatically allow for the fixing of a continental shelf boundary, that concept encouraged States to request international tribunals to determine continental shelf boundaries on the basis of the geological and geomorphological features of the seabed. In the Libya v. Malta Case, however, the rejection of geological and geomorphological factors was total. Especially, Natural prolongation was the then checkmated as a relevant fact in delimitation between coasts situated less than 400 nm. apart. There can be no doubt that, in several disputed cases, prominent geomorphological variations are simply ignored ; nevertheless, there are also a few agreementswhere geological and geomorphological characteristics come into play and, to a certain extent, affect maritime boundaries. Physical characteristics of sea-bed are generally given serious consideration in the boundary delimitation such as the final negotiated boundary of the Australia-Indonesia Continental Shelf boundary Agreement(Timor and Arafura seas) which follows the continental slope bordering the Timor Trench.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "권문상. 1989. 해양경계획정에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문" 경희대학교. 265 p.

    2 "從國際海洋劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ與大陸架劃界問題" 524-, 2006

    3 "國際海洋劃界的理論與實踐" 法律出版社, 北京 309-, 2001

    4 "Tommy T.B. and Shanmugan Jayakumar. 1985. Negotiating Process of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. p. 68-86. In United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 A Commentary. ed. by M.H. Nordquist. Martinus Nijhoff Pub."

    5 "Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation" Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland 425-, 2006

    6 "Case Law on Equitable Maritime Delimitation: Digest and Commentaries" Nijhoff, Hague 1184-, 2003

    7 "Ao. 1987. The System for Settlement of Disputes under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Martinus Nijhoff. Dordrecht. 285 p."

    1 "권문상. 1989. 해양경계획정에 관한 연구. 박사학위논문" 경희대학교. 265 p.

    2 "從國際海洋劃界原則和實踐論中國EEZ與大陸架劃界問題" 524-, 2006

    3 "國際海洋劃界的理論與實踐" 法律出版社, 北京 309-, 2001

    4 "Tommy T.B. and Shanmugan Jayakumar. 1985. Negotiating Process of the United Nations Conference on the Law of the Sea. p. 68-86. In United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 A Commentary. ed. by M.H. Nordquist. Martinus Nijhoff Pub."

    5 "Predictability and Flexibility in the Law of Maritime Delimitation" Hart Publishing, Oxford and Portland 425-, 2006

    6 "Case Law on Equitable Maritime Delimitation: Digest and Commentaries" Nijhoff, Hague 1184-, 2003

    7 "Ao. 1987. The System for Settlement of Disputes under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. Martinus Nijhoff. Dordrecht. 285 p."

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2014-03-31 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국해양연구원 -> 한국해양과학기술원
    영문명 : Korea Ocean Research and Development Institute -> Korea Institute of Ocean Science & Technology
    KCI등재
    2014-01-01 등재 SCOPUS 등재 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-06-28 학술지등록 한글명 : Ocean and Polar Research
    외국어명 : Ocean and Polar Research
    KCI등재
    2005-06-28 학술지등록 한글명 : Ocean Science Journal
    외국어명 : Ocean Science Journal
    KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2002-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2000-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.38 0.38 0.43
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.39 0.35 0.749 0.1
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼