RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI우수등재

    구매기업과의 신제품 공동개발 과정에서 발생하는 프로젝트 모호성에 대한 실증적 연구 = 공급업체의 관점에서

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100856854

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Buying firms often involve suppliers in their new product development projects to reduce development cost and lead time and improve manufacturability of the new product. To be successful, a supplier organization needs to understand clearly its roles and responsibilities expected by the buyer organization. Yet the supplier often complains about insufficient and unclear data, and suffers from ambiguous interpretations that contradict buyer`s expectation. We conceptualized project ambiguity as perceived uncertainty arising from insufficient information, unclear definitions, conflicting interpretations, and misunderstandings of facts in carrying out relevant tasks. Although both organizations may face project ambiguity, this study focused on the supplier side. Hence, we explore the antecedents to supplier-perceived project ambiguity, and its effect upon the supplier`s project performance and business performance. Underpinned in the knowledge based view of the firm, we suggested the following four antecedents: product innovativeness, buyer`s protectiveness of core knowledge, supplier absorptive capacity, and degree of buyer-supplier routine communication. A total of 103 joint new product development projects were sampled from the automotive, electronics, and defense industries in Korea to empirically test the hypotheses. Empirical analyses revealed that product innovativeness and buyer`s protectiveness of core knowledge significantly increased ambiguity perceived by the supplier, and in turn, that the greater ambiguity negatively affected the project performance and supplier`s business performance measures.
    번역하기

    Buying firms often involve suppliers in their new product development projects to reduce development cost and lead time and improve manufacturability of the new product. To be successful, a supplier organization needs to understand clearly its roles a...

    Buying firms often involve suppliers in their new product development projects to reduce development cost and lead time and improve manufacturability of the new product. To be successful, a supplier organization needs to understand clearly its roles and responsibilities expected by the buyer organization. Yet the supplier often complains about insufficient and unclear data, and suffers from ambiguous interpretations that contradict buyer`s expectation. We conceptualized project ambiguity as perceived uncertainty arising from insufficient information, unclear definitions, conflicting interpretations, and misunderstandings of facts in carrying out relevant tasks. Although both organizations may face project ambiguity, this study focused on the supplier side. Hence, we explore the antecedents to supplier-perceived project ambiguity, and its effect upon the supplier`s project performance and business performance. Underpinned in the knowledge based view of the firm, we suggested the following four antecedents: product innovativeness, buyer`s protectiveness of core knowledge, supplier absorptive capacity, and degree of buyer-supplier routine communication. A total of 103 joint new product development projects were sampled from the automotive, electronics, and defense industries in Korea to empirically test the hypotheses. Empirical analyses revealed that product innovativeness and buyer`s protectiveness of core knowledge significantly increased ambiguity perceived by the supplier, and in turn, that the greater ambiguity negatively affected the project performance and supplier`s business performance measures.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 유영만, "상상하여? 창조하라!" 위즈덤하우스 2008

    2 Chen, I. J, "Toward a theory of supply chain management:The constructs and measurements" 22 : 119-150, 2004

    3 Swink,M, "Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes" 17 : 691-709, 1999

    4 Baron, R. M, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

    5 Song, X. M., "The determinants of Japanese new product success" 34 : 64-76, 1997

    6 Barclay, D., "The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration (with commentaries)" 2 : 285-324, 1995

    7 Song, M., "Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures" 26 : 1-22, 2008

    8 Petersen, K. J., "Supplier integration into new product development:coordinating product,process and supply chain design" 23 : 371-388, 2005

    9 Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice:a review and recommended two-step approach" 103 : 441-443, 1988

    10 Podsakoff, P., "Self-reports in organizational research:Problems and prospects" 12 : 531-544, 1986

    1 유영만, "상상하여? 창조하라!" 위즈덤하우스 2008

    2 Chen, I. J, "Toward a theory of supply chain management:The constructs and measurements" 22 : 119-150, 2004

    3 Swink,M, "Threats to new product manufacturability and the effects of development team integration processes" 17 : 691-709, 1999

    4 Baron, R. M, "The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research:Conceptual,strategic,and statistical considerations" 51 : 1173-1182, 1986

    5 Song, X. M., "The determinants of Japanese new product success" 34 : 64-76, 1997

    6 Barclay, D., "The Partial Least Squares (PLS) Approach to Causal Modeling: Personal Computer Adoption and Use as an Illustration (with commentaries)" 2 : 285-324, 1995

    7 Song, M., "Supplier's involvement and success of radical new product development in new ventures" 26 : 1-22, 2008

    8 Petersen, K. J., "Supplier integration into new product development:coordinating product,process and supply chain design" 23 : 371-388, 2005

    9 Anderson, J. C., "Structural equation modeling in practice:a review and recommended two-step approach" 103 : 441-443, 1988

    10 Podsakoff, P., "Self-reports in organizational research:Problems and prospects" 12 : 531-544, 1986

    11 Dillman, D. A., "Questionnaire Response:a four-state comparison" 39 : 744-756, 1974

    12 Grant,R.M, "Prospering in dynamicallycompetitive environment:organizational capability as knowledge integration" 7 : 375-386, 1996

    13 Clark,K.B, "Project scope and project performance:the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development" 35 : 1247-1263, 1989

    14 Daft, R., "Organizational information requirements,media richness and structural design" 32 : 554-571, 1986

    15 Lambert, D. M., "Measuring non-response bias in customer service mail surveys" 11 : 5-25, 1990

    16 Hatley, J. L., "Managing the Buyer-Supplier interface for on-time performance in product development" 15 : 57-70, 1997

    17 Wynstra. J. Y. F., "Managing Supplier Involvement in Product Development:Three Critical Issues" 19 : 157-167, 2001

    18 Liebeskind,J.P, "Knowledge,strategy,and theory of the firm" 17 : 93-107, 1996

    19 Inkpen, A. C., "Knowledge, Bargaining Power, and the Instability of International Joint Ventures" 22 : 177-202, 1997

    20 Kogut, B., "Knowledge of the firm,combinative capabilities,and replication of technology" 3 : 383-397, 1992

    21 Gupta, A. K., "Knowledge flows within multinational corporations" 21 : 473-496, 2000

    22 Winter,S.G, "Knowledge and competence as strategic assets, In The Competitive Challenge – Strategies for Industrial Innovation and Renewal" Baltinger 1987

    23 Chin,W.W, "Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling" 22 : 7-16, 1998

    24 Handfield, R. B., "Involving Suppliers in new product development" 42 : 59-84, 1999

    25 Koufteros, X., "Internal and external integration for product development:The contingency effect of uncertainty,equivocality,and platform strategy" 36 : 97-133, 2005

    26 Paulraj, A., "Inter-organizational communication as a relational competency:Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships" 26 : 45-64, 2008

    27 Koufteros, X. A., "Integrated product development practices and competitive capabilities:the effects of uncertainty,equivocality,and platform strategy" 20 : 331-355, 2002

    28 Flynn, B. B., "Impact of supply chain integration on performance:A contingency and configuration approach" 28 : 58-71, 2010

    29 Sapienza, H. J., "Impact of Agency Risks and Task Uncertainty on Venture Capitalist-CEO Interaction" 37 : 1618-1632, 1994

    30 Szulanski,G, "Exploring internal stickiness:Impediments to the transfer of best practice within the firm" 17 : 27-44, 1996

    31 Fornell, C., "Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable measurement error" 18 : 39-50, 1981

    32 Ghoshal, S., "Creation,adoption,and diffusion of innovations by subsidiaries of multinational corporations" 19 : 365-388, 1988

    33 Lunsford,J.L, "Boeing scrambles to repair problems with new plane" 7-, 2007

    34 Gerbing, D. W., "An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment" 25 : 186-192, 1988

    35 Primo, M. A. M., "An exploratory study of the effects of supplier relationships on new product development outcomes" 20 : 33-52, 2002

    36 Simonin,B.L, "Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances" 20 : 595-623, 1999

    37 March, J, G., "Ambiguity and choice in organizations" Universitetsforlaget 1976

    38 Zahra, S., "Absorptive capacity:a review,reconceptualization,and extension" 27 : 185-203, 2002

    39 Cohen, W. M, "Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation" 35 : 128-152, 1990

    40 Tu, Q., "Absorptive capacity:Enhancing the assimilation of time-based manufacturing practices" 24 : 692-710, 2006

    41 Grant, R. M., "A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances" 41 : 61-84, 2004

    42 Koufteros, X. A., ""Black-box"and"gray-box"supplier integration in product development:Antecedents,consequences and the moderating role of firm size" 25 : 847-870, 2007

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2022 평가 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
    2017-01-01 등재 우수등재학술지 선정 (계속평가)
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.45 1.48
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.793 0.2
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼