Against the backdrop of digital transformation and increasing market uncertainty, organizations are becoming increasingly reliant on employees’ innovative activities under resource constraints and institutional boundaries. As higher-risk and breakth...
Against the backdrop of digital transformation and increasing market uncertainty, organizations are becoming increasingly reliant on employees’ innovative activities under resource constraints and institutional boundaries. As higher-risk and breakthrough-oriented forms of innovation, bootleg innovation behavior and radical creativity can generate competitive advantages for organizations, while also placing greater demands on leader support, employee psychological resources, and communication environments. Therefore, this study takes leadership political skill as a starting point to examine its influence mechanism on employees’ deviant innovation behaviors and radical creativity, introducing positive psychological capital as a mediating variable and further investigating the moderating role of communication satisfaction, thereby establishing the ‘leadership political skill–positive psychological capital–innovation performance’ pathway and its boundary conditions. This study collected survey data from corporate employees and used SPSS and AMOS software to assess the reliability, validity, and discriminant validity of the measurement model. Based on these assessments, correlation analysis and structural relationship tests were conducted, followed by further examinations of mediating effects, moderating effects, and moderated mediation effects. The findings reveal two key mechanisms. First, leader political skill indirectly promotes employees’ deviant innovation behavior and radical creativity by enhancing their positive psychological capital—a set of positive psychological resources including self-efficacy, hope, optimism, and resilience. This mediating pathway explains how external support from leaders is internalized by employees and transformed into the capacity to engage in high-risk innovative activities. Second, communication satisfaction serves as a critical boundary condition for both direct and indirect effects: when communication satisfaction is high, the positive direct effect of leadership political skill on deviant innovation behavior and radical creativity becomes stronger, and the indirect effect through positive psychological capital is also amplified. These results indicate that communication satisfaction, as a situational resource, facilitates the transmission of leadership influence and the conversion of psychological resources into innovative actions. The theoretical contribution of this study lies in integrating leadership political skill, bootleg innovation behavior, and radical creativity into a unified analytical framework, clarifying the mediating role of positive psychological capital between leadership influence and high-risk innovation, and extending the boundary conditions of political skill effects from the perspective of organizational communication. Practically, the research suggests that when pursuing breakthrough innovations, organizations should focus on selecting and developing managers’ political skills, systematically enhancing employees’ positive psychological capital, and optimizing communication feedback and cross-departmental collaboration mechanisms, thereby strengthening innovation vitality and transformation efficiency while managing innovation risks.