한국과 일본의 국어교과서 및 소설에 나타난 呼稱 대조 연구 = A Comparative Study on the Address Terms in Native Language Textbooks and Novels of Korea and Japan

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study is to explore the social atmosphere and the similarities and differences of Korea and Japan through examination of the address terms in the native language textbooks for middle school and novels of Korea and Japan.
An address term plays an important role in illuminating the relationship between language and social structure in a specific language community. For comparison, the present study divides the address terms into ‘pronoun type’, ‘name type’, ‘occupation･position type’, ‘kindred type’, ‘common name type’, and ‘avoidance type.’ To begin with, the most frequently used address terms in the native language textbooks were the ‘occupation･position type’ in both Korea and Japan, followed by the address terms of the ‘name type’ in Korea and the ‘common name type’ in Japan. Korean textbooks had many address terms representing ‘the second-person pronouns’, ‘full names’, ‘names’, ‘vulgar nicknames’, ‘positions representing relative positions’ (standing for hierarchy like king and boss), ‘titles for kindred including relatives’ and ‘tendency toward turning to kindred’ (cases of using kindred titles for someone who is not a member of kindred such as uncle), and ‘vulgar common names.’ On the other hand, Japanese textbooks had relatively few use of address terms, yet had more ‘surnames’ and ‘avoidance type’ than Korean textbooks, and many address terms of ‘position type’ were those words representing ‘temporary positions.’ In the novels of the two countries, many address terms were of ‘name type’ and ‘kindred type’ with increasing cases of using ‘avoidance type.’ While the differences between the two countries were similar to the cases of textbooks, Japanese novels have increased cases of ‘names’, ‘breed titles’, and ‘tendency to kindred’, and compared to Korean novels, had more frequent use of ‘nicknames’ and ‘avoidance.’ The results show that address terms reflect the social atmosphere of the two countries, and also there are differences between the texts of the two countries.
Compared to previous studies, the present study shows that address terms are sensitive to social changes, and directly reflect the social atmosphere and structure. This study also confirms that address terms vary according to the purpose of the text, that is, whether it is a textbook or a novel.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 류재봉, "호칭과 지칭예절" 예영커뮤니케이션 14-25, 1997

2 이미숙, "한･일 중학교 국어교과서의 ‘문학텍스트’ 연구" 한국일본학회 (105) : 109-124, 2015

3 洪珉杓, "한일친족호칭의 대조적 고찰" 한국일본어학회 1 : 277-292, 1999

4 소강춘, "한국, 조선, 중국 교과서에 나타난 어휘 특징에 대한국어정보학적 연구" 한국언어문학회 (53) : 181-206, 2004

5 김성철, "한국 사회와 호칭어" 역락 75-95, 2005

6 이미숙, "한ㆍ일 중학교 국어교과서의 어휘 분포 대조" 한국일본학회 (102) : 13-33, 2015

7 강병주, "한·일어 호칭어 대조연구" 경북대학교 대학원 2009

8 한영옥, "한·일 호칭에 관한 사회언어학적 연구" 중앙대학교대학원 2006

9 北島隹代子, "한·일 양어의 호칭에 관한 연구 : 「호칭의 확대사용」을 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2012

10 동아출판사 편집부, "프라임 일한사전" 동아출판사 2011

11 국립국어원, "표준국어대사전" 동아출판사 2000

12 권현진, "일본어의 가족호칭 사용 변화에 대한 연구- 일본 초등학교 국어교과서 대화체 문장을 중심으로 -" 한국일어일문학회 62 (62): 1-22, 2007

13 연세대학교 대언어정보개발연구소, "연세한국어사전" 두산동아 2002

14 고예진, "애니 베어드(Annie Luaurie Baird)의 저서에 나타난 한국문화 이해양상 고찰" 인문과학연구소 (33) : 9-33, 2012

15 이익섭, "사회언어학" 민음사 173-214, 1994

16 李庸悳, "韓·日 兩言語의 相對呼稱에 관한 硏究" 한국일본학회 57 : 223-240, 2003

17 林炫情, "日韓兩言語の呼称に関する對照硏究-社會言語學的見地から" 廣島大學院 2002

18 小池生夫他, "応用言語学事典" 研究社 2003

19 新村出編, "広辞苑 第三版" 岩波書店 1987

20 石原千秋, "国語教科書の思想" ちくま新書 7-15, 2014

21 福嶋隆史, "国語が子どもをダメにする" 中公新書ラクレ 2012

22 国立国語研究所, "分類語彙表" 国立国語研究所 1964

23 김복순, "‘딸의 서사’에 나타난 타자의 이중성 23" 명지대학교 인문과학연구소 19-38, 2001