RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      윌리엄 칼로스 윌리엄즈의 작품에 나타난 재생 = Resurrection in William Carlos Williams’s Poems

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103999599

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      When we talk about resurrection, we naturally think of religious concepts,whether they are those of Christianity or those of Buddhism. But in WilliamCarlos Williams, we need not put religious concepts on the resurrectionexpressed in his poems. It is sure that Williams’s thought of resurrection isconcerned with material, not with spirit.
      In the poems we examined in this paper, his thought of resurrection ofmaterial is expressed repeatedly, but rebirth of spirit is not evident. All theexisting lives are visible representation of the invisible life-force and death isthe transformation of the visible into the invisible. Although life-force in natureexists always, sometimes it is visible and sometimes not. Only when it entersinto the material, for example, seeds, bushes etc, it becomes visible.
      Williams seems to think that the nature’s life-force doesn’t change and thenature keeps its life-force inside itself until water in spring spurs the life-forcein natural objects to keep alive. Even though individual objects seem to liveand die, their life-force remains the same whether it comes to be visible orinvisible. When it comes to be visible, we call it a resurrection in William Carlos Williams’s works.
      번역하기

      When we talk about resurrection, we naturally think of religious concepts,whether they are those of Christianity or those of Buddhism. But in WilliamCarlos Williams, we need not put religious concepts on the resurrectionexpressed in his poems. It is s...

      When we talk about resurrection, we naturally think of religious concepts,whether they are those of Christianity or those of Buddhism. But in WilliamCarlos Williams, we need not put religious concepts on the resurrectionexpressed in his poems. It is sure that Williams’s thought of resurrection isconcerned with material, not with spirit.
      In the poems we examined in this paper, his thought of resurrection ofmaterial is expressed repeatedly, but rebirth of spirit is not evident. All theexisting lives are visible representation of the invisible life-force and death isthe transformation of the visible into the invisible. Although life-force in natureexists always, sometimes it is visible and sometimes not. Only when it entersinto the material, for example, seeds, bushes etc, it becomes visible.
      Williams seems to think that the nature’s life-force doesn’t change and thenature keeps its life-force inside itself until water in spring spurs the life-forcein natural objects to keep alive. Even though individual objects seem to liveand die, their life-force remains the same whether it comes to be visible orinvisible. When it comes to be visible, we call it a resurrection in William Carlos Williams’s works.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 최용미, "윌리엄스의 작품에 나타난 에머슨 시학 전통" 한국현대영미시학회 13 (13): 173-200, 2007

      2 구자광, "윌리엄 카를로스 윌리암스의 여성성에 대하여" 한국현대영미시학회 10 (10): 1-22, 2004

      3 양균원, "사물다움에 대한 추구: 스티븐스와 윌리엄스" 한국현대영미시학회 11 (11): 31-60, 2005

      4 Jarrell, Randall, "William Carlos Williams: Selected Poems with an Introduction. The New Classics Series" Vail Ballow 1949

      5 Burke, Kenneth, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 46-60, 1966

      6 Macksey, Richard A., "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 131-149, 1966

      7 Pearce, Roy Harvey, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 96-114, 1966

      8 Miller, J. Hillis, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 1-14, 1966

      9 Koch, Vivienne, "William Carlos Williams" New Directions 1950

      10 Ellmann, Richard, "The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry" W. W. Norton 1973

      1 최용미, "윌리엄스의 작품에 나타난 에머슨 시학 전통" 한국현대영미시학회 13 (13): 173-200, 2007

      2 구자광, "윌리엄 카를로스 윌리암스의 여성성에 대하여" 한국현대영미시학회 10 (10): 1-22, 2004

      3 양균원, "사물다움에 대한 추구: 스티븐스와 윌리엄스" 한국현대영미시학회 11 (11): 31-60, 2005

      4 Jarrell, Randall, "William Carlos Williams: Selected Poems with an Introduction. The New Classics Series" Vail Ballow 1949

      5 Burke, Kenneth, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 46-60, 1966

      6 Macksey, Richard A., "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 131-149, 1966

      7 Pearce, Roy Harvey, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 96-114, 1966

      8 Miller, J. Hillis, "William Carlos Williams: A Collection of Critical Essays" Prentice-Hall 1-14, 1966

      9 Koch, Vivienne, "William Carlos Williams" New Directions 1950

      10 Ellmann, Richard, "The Norton Anthology of Modern Poetry" W. W. Norton 1973

      11 Williams, Carlos William, "The Collected Later Poems of William Carlos Williams. (New Directions Books)" The Haddon Craftsmen 1950

      12 Williams, Carlos William, "The Collected Later Poems of William Carlos Williams, Vol 1 1909-1939" New Directions 1986

      13 Williams, Carlos William, "The Collected Earlier Poems of William Carlos Williams" The Haddon Craftsmen 1951

      14 Guimond, James, "The Art of William Carlos Williams" U of Illinois P 1968

      15 Williams, Carlos William, "Paterson" New Directions 1963

      16 Williams, Carlos William, "Letter to an Australian Editor" 17 (17): 8-12, 1991

      17 Williams, Carlos William, "American Short Novels" 1960

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.16 0.16 0.19
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.15 0.15 0.548 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼