도심제조업 보존을 위한 도시재생 사례 비교연구 - 오타구와 을지로-청계천 공구상가 사례를 중심으로 - = A Comparative Study of Urban Regeneration for the Urban Manufacturing Industry Preservation - Focusing on the Cases of ‘Ota City Factory Area’ and ‘Euljiro-Cheonggyecheon Tool Market’-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

(Background and Purpose) As the 3rd and even 4th Industrial Revolutions arrive, Korea and other developed countries are actively debating whether to preserve their modern industrial heritage. At the same time, they have presented various attempts and best practices for the use of modern industrial heritage. Nevertheless, urban regeneration using modern industrial heritage tends to focus mainly on preserving tangible assets, while intangible assets are not properly protected. For authentic preservation, tangible and intangible heritage must be considered. Therefore, it is meaningful to study the preservation value and sustainability of various aspects of an area with modern industrial heritage, which is under consideration for demolition and urban redevelopment in a city. (Method) The scope of this study was limited to the metal-related urban manufacturing industry, which showed a strong industrial ecosystem and industrial cluster characteristics. Through comparative case studies of the Ota City Factory Area and Euljiro-Cheonggyecheon Tool Market district, the city outline, history, process of change, urban policies, and citizen participation were compared to determine how to maintain the unique industrial environment and respond to urban regeneration or redevelopment. (Results) Ota City and Euljiro formed industrial clusters around the same time based on similar industrial categories, and implemented policies for industrial promotion and regeneration in the direction of governance. However, the former promoted regeneration policies based on a local-community-oriented town building, while the latter aimed to “preserve modern industrial heritage” led by local governments. These differences affected the preservation and management of both tangible and intangible assets. For example, Ota City regarded “tool-houses” as a local cultural asset, and the public and private sectors made progress in the environment by investigating and finding improvements through cooperation. In the case of Euljiro, with the exception of “Sewoon Sangga,” which was designated as a modern cultural heritage site, the surrounding area is under strong pressure to regenerate. (Conclusions) The flexibility, transformability, creativity, and management of urban manufacturing are industrial characteristics that can adapt to a rapidly changing modern society. Also, they are important factors in producing a “cultural economy” in a post-modern industrial society. In addition, various efforts and interests to protect and promote intangible assets, such as the experience and know-how of technical craftsmen, are effective and sustainable ways to preserve a city’s industrial ecosystem. In particular, the knowledge exchange and experience generated in the process of production in urban manufacturing environments are important assets in today’s information and knowledge society. Therefore, continuous research is needed on urban regeneration in the direction of preserving the industrial ecosystem from both urban and economic perspectives.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김현모, "통계로 보는 문화유산 2020" 문화재청 2020

2 이용원, "작은연구보고서. 8" 경기도따복공동체지원센터 2015

3 박진도, "일본의 비계열 중소기업에 관한연구-동경도 오오타구 하이테크형 중소기업을 중심으로" 5 (5): 183-218, 1999

4 김영수, "우리나라 클러스터정책의 특징과 지역산업생태계론으로의 진화 필요성" 한국지역학회 28 (28): 23-43, 2012

5 서울시 도심재정비일담당관, "세운재정비촉진지구 그과정의 기록"

6 서울시, "세운상가일대 도시재생 활성화계획" 서울시 2017

7 강홍빈, "세운상가와 그 이웃들" 서울역사박물관조사연구과 2010

8 김묵한, "서울시 주요 제조업의 공정특성별 맞춤형정책방향" 서울연구원 2017

9 유태용, "서울 세운유적II -세운 재정비촉진지구 3-1구역 시굴·발굴조사 보고서" (재)청구고고연구원 2021

10 박경룡, "서울 번영의 상징 을지로" 서울중구문화원 2015

11 김정훈 ; 성열홍, "도시제조업 경쟁력 강화를 위한 정책사례 연구- 서울시 도시형 소공인을 중심으로 -" 한국상품문화디자인학회 (55) : 149-161, 2018

12 이윤숙 ; 이성희, "대도시 제조업 집적지의 공급사슬특성과 운영성과: 서울시의 주요 제조업을 중심으로" 한국상품학회 39 (39): 125-132, 2021

13 한국건축역사학회, "근대문화유산 보존 및 활용사례연구" 문화재청 근대문화재과 2006

14 이순자, "근대 산업유산의보존·활용 기본계획 수립을 위한 기초자료 연구" 국토연구원 2008

15 モノづくり観光研究会, "大田モノまち BOOK 2011クリエイティブタウン大田を目指して"

16 Bansal, Benjamin, "Urban Space as a Factor of Production : Accounting for the Success of Small Factories in Postwar Tokyo" 23 (23): 281-298, 2020

17 Cheonggoo Institute of Archaeology, "The Excavation Report of the Architecture Remains of Chosun to Modern Period in Sewoon Commercial Complex(II)" Seoul Metropolitan City 2021

18 Fujita, Kuniko, "Neo-industrial Tokyo : Urban Development and Globalisation in Japan’s State-centred Developmental Capitalism" 40 (40): 249-281, 2003

19 Shim, Hanbyul, "Institutional Construction of Economic Production Activities and Urban Morphologic Changes in Seoul C.B.D" Seoul National University Graduate School 2013

20 Fujita, Kuniko, "Industrial Districts and Economic Development in Japan : The Case of Tokyo and Osaka" 12 (12): 181-198, 1998

21 Choi, Hyukkyoo, "From the Redevelopment Promotion District to the Industrial Ecosystem-Focusing on the method of resistance of urban social movement and the experience of activists" 8 (8): 45-84, 2020

22 Song, Ara, "Analysis of the Formation of the ‘Preservation’ Discourse and Key Issues Regarding the Se-woon District Redevelopment Plan" Seoul National University Graduate School 2019

23 Kim, Sunyoung, "A Study for the Urban Industry Specialization Plan for Jung-gu" Jung-gu 2019