RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    부동산 명의신탁의 불법원인급여 성립 여부 - 대법원 2019. 6. 20. 선고 2013다218156 전원합의체 판결과 관련하여 - = The Establishment of Performances for Illegal Cause in the Title Trust Agreement - About the Judgment of 2013Da218156 -

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109467668

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Since title trust agreement is invalid cause of violating of ‘the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name’, it has always been the subject of legal disputes whether the registration is regarded as the performance for illegal cause.
    The existing legal rule has been sustained by a long-term precedent, it is that “It cannot be concluded that the registration is not regarded as the performance for illegal cause only because it was registered in the name of the title trustee in violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name”.
    On the contrary, criticism has been raised by academics that the transfer of registration under the title trust agreement is the performance for illegal cause, so that the title truster cannot exercise the right to claim the return of the trust property, and that the trust property is attributed to the title trustee due to its reflective effect.
    In addition, it has the following problems structurally, ① whether the title trustee who arbitrarily disposes of the trust property is punished by embezzlement, ② the issue of restoration of title trust in litigation for cancellation of act that does harm the creditor of the title truster, ③ the question of who is imposed on the trust property acquisition tax in accordance with the principle of actual taxation.
    In order to judge the decision to change the existing precedent, the Supreme Court shall refer it to the consensus, and listen to the opinions of various fields on February 20, 2019. Finally, the majority opinion(9persons) reaffirmed the validity of the conventional precedent, and the dissenting opinion(4persons) now requires a judicial decision to eradicate the title trust.
    In this paper, I would like to examine the possibility that the court can judge the title trust as the performance for illegal cause, taking into account specific circumstances such as the motive and purpose of the title trust, with the legislative improvement according to the changed reality of society.
    번역하기

    Since title trust agreement is invalid cause of violating of ‘the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name’, it has always been the subject of legal disputes whether the registration is regarded as the performance f...

    Since title trust agreement is invalid cause of violating of ‘the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name’, it has always been the subject of legal disputes whether the registration is regarded as the performance for illegal cause.
    The existing legal rule has been sustained by a long-term precedent, it is that “It cannot be concluded that the registration is not regarded as the performance for illegal cause only because it was registered in the name of the title trustee in violation of the Act on the Registration of Real Estate under Actual Titleholder’s Name”.
    On the contrary, criticism has been raised by academics that the transfer of registration under the title trust agreement is the performance for illegal cause, so that the title truster cannot exercise the right to claim the return of the trust property, and that the trust property is attributed to the title trustee due to its reflective effect.
    In addition, it has the following problems structurally, ① whether the title trustee who arbitrarily disposes of the trust property is punished by embezzlement, ② the issue of restoration of title trust in litigation for cancellation of act that does harm the creditor of the title truster, ③ the question of who is imposed on the trust property acquisition tax in accordance with the principle of actual taxation.
    In order to judge the decision to change the existing precedent, the Supreme Court shall refer it to the consensus, and listen to the opinions of various fields on February 20, 2019. Finally, the majority opinion(9persons) reaffirmed the validity of the conventional precedent, and the dissenting opinion(4persons) now requires a judicial decision to eradicate the title trust.
    In this paper, I would like to examine the possibility that the court can judge the title trust as the performance for illegal cause, taking into account specific circumstances such as the motive and purpose of the title trust, with the legislative improvement according to the changed reality of society.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼