RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재 SSCI SCIE SCOPUS

    국내 간호학 학회지에 출판된 구조방정식모형 연구의 방법론적 질 평가 = A Methodological Quality Assessment of South Korean Nursing Research using Structural Equation Modeling in South Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104580156

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling inKorea. Methods: Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH terms‘nursing’, ‘structure’, ‘model’. A total of 152 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant titles, 61 papers were readin full. Results: Of the sixty-one articles retrieved, 14 studies were published between 1992 and 2000, 27, between 2001 and 2010, and20, between 2011 and March 2014. The methodological quality of the review examined varied considerably. Conclusion: The findings ofthis study suggest that more rigorous research is necessary to address theoretical identification, two indicator rule, distribution of sample,treatment of missing values, mediator effect, discriminant validity, convergent validity, post hoc model modification, equivalent models issues,and alternative models issues should be undergone. Further research with robust consistent methodological study designs frommodel identification to model respecification is needed to improve the validity of the research.
    번역하기

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling inKorea. Methods: Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH...

    Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the methodological quality of nursing studies using structural equation modeling inKorea. Methods: Databases of KISS, DBPIA, and National Assembly Library up to March 2014 were searched using the MeSH terms‘nursing’, ‘structure’, ‘model’. A total of 152 studies were screened. After removal of duplicates and non-relevant titles, 61 papers were readin full. Results: Of the sixty-one articles retrieved, 14 studies were published between 1992 and 2000, 27, between 2001 and 2010, and20, between 2011 and March 2014. The methodological quality of the review examined varied considerably. Conclusion: The findings ofthis study suggest that more rigorous research is necessary to address theoretical identification, two indicator rule, distribution of sample,treatment of missing values, mediator effect, discriminant validity, convergent validity, post hoc model modification, equivalent models issues,and alternative models issues should be undergone. Further research with robust consistent methodological study designs frommodel identification to model respecification is needed to improve the validity of the research.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 김진호, "경영학 연구에서의 구조방정식 모형의 적용: 문헌 연구와 비판" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 897-923, 2007

    2 Hoyle RH, "Writing about structural equation models. In:Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications" Sage 158-176, 1995

    3 Lim NY, "The trend of Korean nursing research with the LISREL" 31 (31): 221-231, 2001

    4 Yu JP, "The misunderstanding and prejudice of structural equation models" Hannare Publishing Co 2014

    5 M. P. Martens, "The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research" SAGE Publications 33 (33): 269-298, 2005

    6 Craig Enders, "The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models" Informa UK Limited 8 (8): 430-457, 2001

    7 Ralph O. Mueller, "Structural equation modeling: Back to basics" Informa UK Limited 4 (4): 353-369, 2009

    8 Gyeong Suk Lee, "Structural Equation Modeling on Life-world Integration in People with Severe Burns" 한국간호과학회 7 (7): 112-119, 2013

    9 R. Lance Holbert, "Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995?2000" Wiley-Blackwell 28 (28): 531-551, 2002

    10 Raykov T, "Reporting structural equation modeling results in psychology and aging : Some proposed guidelines" 6 (6): 499-503, 1991

    1 김진호, "경영학 연구에서의 구조방정식 모형의 적용: 문헌 연구와 비판" 한국경영학회 36 (36): 897-923, 2007

    2 Hoyle RH, "Writing about structural equation models. In:Hoyle RH, editor. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications" Sage 158-176, 1995

    3 Lim NY, "The trend of Korean nursing research with the LISREL" 31 (31): 221-231, 2001

    4 Yu JP, "The misunderstanding and prejudice of structural equation models" Hannare Publishing Co 2014

    5 M. P. Martens, "The Use of Structural Equation Modeling in Counseling Psychology Research" SAGE Publications 33 (33): 269-298, 2005

    6 Craig Enders, "The Relative Performance of Full Information Maximum Likelihood Estimation for Missing Data in Structural Equation Models" Informa UK Limited 8 (8): 430-457, 2001

    7 Ralph O. Mueller, "Structural equation modeling: Back to basics" Informa UK Limited 4 (4): 353-369, 2009

    8 Gyeong Suk Lee, "Structural Equation Modeling on Life-world Integration in People with Severe Burns" 한국간호과학회 7 (7): 112-119, 2013

    9 R. Lance Holbert, "Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995?2000" Wiley-Blackwell 28 (28): 531-551, 2002

    10 Raykov T, "Reporting structural equation modeling results in psychology and aging : Some proposed guidelines" 6 (6): 499-503, 1991

    11 Anne Boomsma, "Reporting Analyses of Covariance Structures" Informa UK Limited 7 (7): 461-483, 2000

    12 Kline RB, "Principles and practice of structural equation modeling" Guilford Press 2011

    13 McDonald RP, "Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses" 7 (7): 64-82, 2002

    14 Bentler PM, "Practical issues in structural modeling. In: Long JS, editor. Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in survey research" Sage 161-192, 1988

    15 Kim KMJ, "NANDA nursing diagnosis, goals and interventions" Hyunmoon 2013

    16 Jöeskog KG, "LISREL 7: A guide to the program and applications" SPSS Inc 1989

    17 Denise F. Polit, "Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations" Wiley-Blackwell 30 (30): 459-467, 2007

    18 F. CHEN, "Improper Solutions in Structural Equation Models: Causes, Consequences, and Strategies" SAGE Publications 29 (29): 468-508, 2001

    19 Steiger JH, "Driving fast in reverse : The relationship between software development, theory, and education in structural equation modeling" 96 (96): 331-338, 2001

    20 Mitchell RJ, "Design and analysis of ecological experiments" Chapman and Hall 211-231, 1993

    21 James B. Schreiber, "Core reporting practices in structural equation modeling" Elsevier BV 4 (4): 83-97, 2008

    22 Moon SB, "Basic concepts and applications of structural equation modeling with AMOS 17.0" Hakjisa 2009

    23 Hans Baumgartner, "Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: A review" Elsevier BV 13 (13): 139-161, 1996

    24 Breckler SJ, "Applications of covariance structure modeling in psychology:Cause for concern?" 107 (107): 260-273, 1990

    25 Robert C. MacCallum, "Applications of Structural Equation Modeling in Psychological Research" Annual Reviews 51 (51): 201-226, 2000

    26 Christopher L. Shook, "An assessment of the use of structural equation modeling in strategic management research" Wiley-Blackwell 25 (25): 397-404, 2004

    27 Arbuckle JL, "Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques" Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1996

    28 Cho HD, "A study on issues of using structure equation modeling in education study" Korea University 2011

    29 R. Weston, "A Brief Guide to Structural Equation Modeling" SAGE Publications 34 (34): 719-751, 2006

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2008-11-07 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한간호학회지 -> Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing KCI등재
    2008-01-01 등재 SSCI 등재 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재후보로 하락 (등재유지) KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2005-02-25 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한간호학회 -> 한국간호과학회
    영문명 : Korean Academy Of Nursing -> Korean Society of Nursing Science
    KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2001-07-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    1999-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.45 1.24 1.62
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.52 1.55 2.24 0.21
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼