住宅政策과 住居水準向上方案에 관한 硏究

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

A residence as a basical fundamental of a being and a home life, a housing as a space of home life and a standard of dwelling as an area of a social activities, are sufficed and grow with economic development, but it still has a lot of matters.
Additionally, even the requirements of quality under the quantities of housing is not enough should be regarded as the absence of a dwelling policy.
Firstly, it should be recognized by the governments that a dwelling policy has been disregarded by the economic policy of export emphasis up to now. In accordance with it, it should be revised by the governor in all parts that it is not dwelling policy of the standard of development countries, but in a viewpoint of N.I.C.S. and so the synthetic housing policy of the future intention should be re-established in the pan-national and political dimension.
Secondly, under the supposition the administration of centralization is executed to turn into decentralization and local administration, it should be established as a long term plan for the present all the laws, rules, economic policies and even the impulse plan of the public house at the present to suit a central policy of the national and the local actual circumstances. To take charge of the maintain in the quantities of housing, the policy of local administration should be executed by the bicameral housing policy in a compound aspects.
Thirdly, now, it is required both face at the same time to satisfy with the sufficiency of quantity and level-up at the quality. If it is required the even improvement of quality on the housing policy after supply the housing of 100%, it will be brought about the large national economic loss.
Additionaly we have too much difficult part in the National aspects, so we will have to introduce the housing policy of Singapore with a device that can be improved dwelling-level progressively, as making a definite the lowest dwelling-level. To open definite policy for the level-up of the quality concerning the residence of level-below, we should put the system of "the resident level-up research" on a facilities of nation and a chase leading role long-term research and improvement.
Fourthly, the present law is limited standard, and it has no influence in the aspect of quality and quantity. Therfore, we are urgent in been of dweling-level at a national unit and the establishment of dwelling-standard.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 目次 = 0
• 第 1 章 序 論 = 1
• 第 1 節 硏究의 目的 = 3
• 第 2 節 硏究範鬪와 方法 = 4
• 第 2 章 住宅 및 住居實態 = 5
• 第 1 節 佐宅의 重要性과 社會的 環境 = 5
• I. 住宅의 重要性 = 5
• Ⅱ. 住宅의 社會的 環境 = 11
• 1. 住業의 社會的 意義 = 11
• 2. 人口構造의 變化 = 12
• 3. 家族構造의 變化와 住居形態 = 12
• 4. 性宅의 社會統合的 機能 = 13
• 第 2 節 住宅現況 = 13
• I. 住宅의 量的現況 = 13
• Ⅱ. 住宅의 設備現況 = 19
• Ⅲ. 住宅의 密度現況 = 20
• 第 3 節 賃借家口의 住居實態 = 24
• I. 住居移勳 = 24
• Ⅱ. 住居費用 = 25
• Ⅲ. 社會的인 制約 = 26
• Ⅳ. 住居實態 = 29
• 第 3 章 佐宅政策과 住居水準의 關係 = 32
• 第 1 節 住宅政策 = 32
• Ⅰ. 韓國의 住宅政策 = 32
• 1. 60年代 以前의 住宅政策 = 32
• 2. 經濟開發計劃과 住宅政策 = 32
• Ⅱ. 日本의 住宅政策 = 36
• 1. 戰後의 住宅政策 = 36
• 2. 量에서 質로 移行期의 住宅計劃 = 37
• 3. 居住水準 = 38
• Ⅲ. 싱가폴의 住宅政策 = 40
• 1. 住宅現況 = 40
• 2. 住宅政策 = 43
• 第 2 節 住宅政策이 住居水準에 미치는 영향 = 45
• Ⅰ. 내집마련 政策 = 45
• Ⅱ. 住宅의 社會的 統合 = 46
• Ⅲ. 都市別 住居水準隔差 = 47
• Ⅳ. 住宅政策의 外國과 差異 = 51
• 第 4 章 住居水準向上方案 = 54
• 第 1 節 住居水準 設定의 必要性 = 54
• 第 2 節 住公아파트 標準平面 分析 = 56
• Ⅰ. 각실별 면적분포 = 56
• Ⅱ. 각실의 규모와 單位室 規格化 問題 = 58
• Ⅲ. 서어비스 부분 = 58
• 第 3 節 住宅 標準設計 基準設定 = 60
• Ⅰ. 平面系列化를 위한 室單位 標準化의 必要性 = 60
• Ⅱ. 室單位 標準化와 平諦의 系列化 = 61
• 第 4 節 住宅水準의 國際比較 = 64
• Ⅰ. 우리나라와 外國의 住宅水準의 比較 = 64
• Ⅱ. 日本의 住宅水準 向上 對策分析 = 69
• Ⅲ. 싱가폴의 住居水準 向上 對策分析 = 74
• Ⅳ. 住居基準 方向 設定 = 75
• 1. 住宅의 質 = 75
• 2. 住宅수준의 質的 向上을 위한 當面課題 = 78
• 3. 住居基準의 設定 = 80
• 4. 住居基準의 達成方案 = 82
• 第 5 節 結論 = 83
• 參考文獻 = 85
• 英文抄錄 = 89