RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    Profile의 Composite와 Multiple Single-Segment Control의 비교 연구 = A Comparison Study between Composite and Multiple Single-Segment Profile Control

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103577454

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    As manufacturing industries become globalized, product design affects every area of organization. The design sets the goals for a number of different departments, so if it fails to effectively communicate these goals, the entire organization is less efficient.
    In addition, To communicate clearly, the design must represent a product that meets its technical specification.
    GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing) is one of the most important factors, which has an effect on efficiency of manufacture system, in designing products. However, most of designers in different industries are prone to ignore the importance of GD&T.
    To analyse the importance of GD&T compliance with international standards for design drawing, a comparison analysis of the difference between two methods, composite profile control and multiple single segment profile control, is performed on three different cases and suggests how it used to be more suitable.
    Composite profile tolerance is specified by a dual feature control frame that has one profile symbol specified with two lines of tolerance information. Whereas a multiple single segment profile control is when two or more single segment profile callouts are used to define the location and/or orientation and/or size and/or form of a part feature. In this study, the following results will be provided : a clear definition and an obvious difference of the tolerance zone, datums and datums sequence and minimization of tolerances.
    On this study, composite profile tolerance and multiple single segment profile tolerance were discussed. Next steps of research will consist on reaching more accurate results for profile control. Further research will be focused on dealing with the remaining 14 symbols of GD&T.
    번역하기

    As manufacturing industries become globalized, product design affects every area of organization. The design sets the goals for a number of different departments, so if it fails to effectively communicate these goals, the entire organization is less e...

    As manufacturing industries become globalized, product design affects every area of organization. The design sets the goals for a number of different departments, so if it fails to effectively communicate these goals, the entire organization is less efficient.
    In addition, To communicate clearly, the design must represent a product that meets its technical specification.
    GD&T (Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing) is one of the most important factors, which has an effect on efficiency of manufacture system, in designing products. However, most of designers in different industries are prone to ignore the importance of GD&T.
    To analyse the importance of GD&T compliance with international standards for design drawing, a comparison analysis of the difference between two methods, composite profile control and multiple single segment profile control, is performed on three different cases and suggests how it used to be more suitable.
    Composite profile tolerance is specified by a dual feature control frame that has one profile symbol specified with two lines of tolerance information. Whereas a multiple single segment profile control is when two or more single segment profile callouts are used to define the location and/or orientation and/or size and/or form of a part feature. In this study, the following results will be provided : a clear definition and an obvious difference of the tolerance zone, datums and datums sequence and minimization of tolerances.
    On this study, composite profile tolerance and multiple single segment profile tolerance were discussed. Next steps of research will consist on reaching more accurate results for profile control. Further research will be focused on dealing with the remaining 14 symbols of GD&T.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Chang, H.S., "Optimal Tolerance Design within Limited Costs using Genetic Algorithm" 22 (22): 33-41, 1999

    2 Krulikowski, A., "Geometric Tolerancing Application Workbook-student version" Effective Training Inc 16-21, 1994

    3 Krulikowski, A., "Fundamentals of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing, video Training workbook" Effective Training Inc 1998

    4 Kang, B. C., "Dimension-Tolerance Design with Cost Factors" 26 (26): 172-191, 1998

    5 Krulikowski, A., "Advanced Concept of GD&T" Effective Training Inc 1999

    6 "ASME Y14.5M-1994, Dimensioning and Tolerancing"

    7 Lee, S.H., "A Study on the Optimization of Position Tolerance of Fasteners Considering Process Capability" Kumoh National Institute of Technology 2007

    8 Park, K.H., "A Study on Tolerance Design of Mechanisms Using the Taguchi Method" 13 (13): 66-77, 1996

    1 Chang, H.S., "Optimal Tolerance Design within Limited Costs using Genetic Algorithm" 22 (22): 33-41, 1999

    2 Krulikowski, A., "Geometric Tolerancing Application Workbook-student version" Effective Training Inc 16-21, 1994

    3 Krulikowski, A., "Fundamentals of Geometric Dimensioning and Tolerancing, video Training workbook" Effective Training Inc 1998

    4 Kang, B. C., "Dimension-Tolerance Design with Cost Factors" 26 (26): 172-191, 1998

    5 Krulikowski, A., "Advanced Concept of GD&T" Effective Training Inc 1999

    6 "ASME Y14.5M-1994, Dimensioning and Tolerancing"

    7 Lee, S.H., "A Study on the Optimization of Position Tolerance of Fasteners Considering Process Capability" Kumoh National Institute of Technology 2007

    8 Park, K.H., "A Study on Tolerance Design of Mechanisms Using the Taguchi Method" 13 (13): 66-77, 1996

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-11-29 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> KOREAN SOCIETY OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING KCI등재
    2021-11-25 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Korean Society of Industrial and Systems Engineering KCI등재
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-12-04 학술지명변경 한글명 : 산업경영시스템학회지 -> 한국산업경영시스템학회지
    외국어명 : Journal of the Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering -> Journal of Society of Korea Industrial and Systems Engineering
    KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2003-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.34 0.34 0.3
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.28 0.28 0.37 0.16
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼