금강유역의 하천 종합건전성 평가 - 생태적 건전성 및 물 복지를 중심으로 - = Assessment of the Freshwater Comprehensive Soundness in the Geum River Basin – Focusing on Ecological Soundness and Water Welfare –

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Freshwater soundness can be broadly divided into the health of river ecosystems and social services for human water use, that is, water welfare. In this study the ecological soundness and water welfare index of rivers were calculated, and the freshwater comprehensive soundness was analyzed using the quadrant model for 14 basins in the Geum River basin. As for the ecological soundness of the river, the area upstream of the dam (based on Daecheong Dam) was evaluated as ‘good’, and the area downstream of the dam was evaluated as ‘bad’. On the other hand as for water welfare, the area downstream of the dam with a large population was in a relatively ‘good’ condition, and the area upstream of the dam had a relatively ‘poor’ level of water welfare. In terms of freshwater comprehensive soundness, it was found that the basins of Mujunamdaecheon, Bocheongcheon and Daecheongdam showed good ecological soundness and water welfare, and the Geumganggongju, Nonsancheon and Geumganhagueon basins were all poor. The Gapcheon basin showed good results in 2014 due to continuous investment and systematic management. Therefore, it is necessary to find ways to utilize it for other watersheds through benchmarking.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

하천 건전성은 하천 생태계의 건강성과 인간의 물 이용에 대한 사회적 서비스 즉, 물 복지로 크게 구분할 수 있다. 본 연구에서는 하천의 생태적 건전성 및 물 복지 지수를 산정하고 4분면 모형을 이용하여 금강수계 14개 중권역에 대한 하천 종합건전성을 분석하였다. 하천의 생태적 건전성은 댐상류(대청댐 기준) 지역이 상대적으로 ‘좋음’으로 나타났으며 댐하류 지역은 ‘나쁨’ 상태로 평가되었다. 반면, 물 복지는 인구규모가 큰 댐하류 지역이 상대적으로 ‘좋음’ 상태였으며 댐상류 지역은 상대적으로 물 복지 수준이 ‘나쁨’으로 나타났다. 하천 종합건전성은 무주남대천, 보청천, 대청댐 유역이 생태적 건전성 및 물 복지 수준이 모두 양호했으며 금강공주, 논산천, 금강하구언 유역은 모두 불량한 것으로 나타났다. 갑천 유역은 지속적인투자와 체계적인 관리로 2014년에는 두 지수 모두 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 따라서 벤치마킹을 통한 타 유역으로의 활용방안을 모색해야 할 필요가 있다.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이도경 ; 안승섭 ; 박기범, "통계연보를 활용한 대구·경북지역 24개 지자체의 물복지 수준 평가" 한국환경과학회 30 (30): 937-944, 2021

2 김홍명 ; 하성룡, "지표의 내재적 가중치를 고려한 하천의 생태적 건전성 평가" 한국환경영향평가학회 30 (30): 258-269, 2021

3 최창현 ; 김연수 ; 김종성 ; 김동현 ; 김정욱 ; 김형수, "빅 데이터 분석 기법을 이용한 풍수해 복원탄력성 지표 개발 및 평가: (2) 복원탄력성 평가" 한국방재학회 18 (18): 109-123, 2018

4 Becker W, "Weights and importance in composite indicators: closing the gap" 80 : 12-22, 2017

5 Korean Society of Environmental Engineers, "Water quality evaluation and analysis of causes of water quality change in weir sections related to the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project. Volume 1 (Parts 1 and 2, Investigation and Evaluation of Water Quality before and after the Four Major Rivers Restoration Project)" 2018

6 Korea Water Resources Corporation, "Study on the development a system for evaluating the health of the rivers comprehensively" 2018

7 Korea Environment Institute, "Research on improvement of environmental standards for water quality and aquatic ecosystem" 2017

8 Saisana M, "Rankings and ratings : Instructions for use" 3 : 247-268, 2011

9 Greco S, "On the methodological framework of composite indices: a reivew of the issues of weighting, aggregation, and robustness" 141 : 61-69, 2019

10 Mazziotta M, "On a generalized non-compensatory composite index for measuring socio-economic phenomena" 127 : 983-1003, 2016

11 Kao C, "Measuring the national competitiveness of Southeast Asian countries" 187 (187): 613-628, 2008

12 Mazziotta M, "Measuring WellBeing Over Time: The adjusted MazziottaPareto index versus other non-compensatory indices" 136 : 967-976, 2018

13 Vollmer D, "Integrating the social, hydrological and ecological dimensions of freshwater health : The Freshwater Health Index" 627 : 304-313, 2018

14 OECD, "Handbook on constructing composite indicators: methodology and user guide"

15 Becker W, "Handbook of uncertainty quantification" Springer international publishing switzerland 1187-1216, 2015

16 Vörösmarty CJ, "Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity" 467 : 555-561, 2010

17 Choi HJ, "Development of national water welfare index and future tasks to realize inclusive water welfare policy" 34 : 63-72, 2020

18 Lee DK, "Development of indicators for the evaluation of welfare in small and medium cities" Graduate School of Kyungil University 2021

19 Karr JR, "Defining and measuring river health" 41 : 221-234, 1999

20 Chang HJ, "Climate change and water-related ecosystem services : impacts of drought in California, USA" 2 (2): 1-19, 2016

21 ANZECC, "Australian and New Zealand guidelines for fresh and marine water quality (Vol. 1, Australian and New Zealand Environment and Conservation Council (ANZECC) and Agriculture and Resource Management Council of Australia and New Zealand (ARMCANZ))"

22 Kim HM, "Analyzing freshwater soundness considering ecological and social characteristics" Graduate School of Chungbuk National University 2020

23 Korea Environment Institute, "A Study on the development and application of index for sustainable water use (I)" 2014

24 이종호, "4대강 살리기사업의 재평가와 보의 운용방안" 한국환경영향평가학회 30 (30): 225-236, 2021