RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    획일적인 단일교육과정 개발에 관한 중등체육 교원들의 견해: 질적연구 접근방식을 활용하여 = Secondary PE Teachers’ Perspectives on a Standardized National Curriculum : Based on a Qualitative Research Approach

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108711685

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    The purpose of this investigation was to explore secondary physical education (PE) teachers’ perspectives on a standardized national curriculum. In total, 17 individuals (male=8, female=9)were purposefully invited to participate in formal in-depth interviews that were deductively/inductively analyzed. Themes indicated curricular standardization has some benefits in terms of offering explicit guidance for PE programs and teachers. It, however, has the potential to prevent opportunities for diverse physical activities of secondary school students. In addition, a nationwide curriculum would not be readily accepted in the contextually and culturally diverse U.S. school setting. It could produce a hegemony of knowledge and the resistance of local entities, preventing local autonomy and independence. Curriculum reform in K-12 PE would have to occur voluntarily at the local and state levels to reduce any potential anti-sentiment to reform from individual schools and teachers. PE curriculum must be culturally relevant, locally adoptable, and tailored for student needs and interests.
    번역하기

    The purpose of this investigation was to explore secondary physical education (PE) teachers’ perspectives on a standardized national curriculum. In total, 17 individuals (male=8, female=9)were purposefully invited to participate in formal in-depth i...

    The purpose of this investigation was to explore secondary physical education (PE) teachers’ perspectives on a standardized national curriculum. In total, 17 individuals (male=8, female=9)were purposefully invited to participate in formal in-depth interviews that were deductively/inductively analyzed. Themes indicated curricular standardization has some benefits in terms of offering explicit guidance for PE programs and teachers. It, however, has the potential to prevent opportunities for diverse physical activities of secondary school students. In addition, a nationwide curriculum would not be readily accepted in the contextually and culturally diverse U.S. school setting. It could produce a hegemony of knowledge and the resistance of local entities, preventing local autonomy and independence. Curriculum reform in K-12 PE would have to occur voluntarily at the local and state levels to reduce any potential anti-sentiment to reform from individual schools and teachers. PE curriculum must be culturally relevant, locally adoptable, and tailored for student needs and interests.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Savage, G. C., "What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics" 8 (8): 319-335, 2020

    2 Sleeter, C. E., "Un-standardizing curriculum" Teachers College Press 2005

    3 Richards, K. A., "The socialization of teachers in physical education : Review and recommendations for future works" 3 (3): 113-143, 2014

    4 Savage, G. C., "The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system" 33 (33): 118-142, 2018

    5 Schapiro, R. A., "The future of Australian federalism: Comparative and interdisciplinary" Cambridge University Press 141-156, 2012

    6 Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory" Aldine 1967

    7 Jewett, A. E., "The curriculum process in physical education" Brown & Benchmark 1995

    8 Ferkel, R. C., "The benefits of health-related fitness education in secondary PE" 76 (76): 883-906, 2019

    9 Sellar, S., "The OECD and global governance in education" 28 (28): 701-725, 2013

    10 Curtner-Smith, M. D., "Teachers’ value orientations and their compatibility with the national curriculum for physical education" 6 (6): 27-45, 2000

    1 Savage, G. C., "What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics" 8 (8): 319-335, 2020

    2 Sleeter, C. E., "Un-standardizing curriculum" Teachers College Press 2005

    3 Richards, K. A., "The socialization of teachers in physical education : Review and recommendations for future works" 3 (3): 113-143, 2014

    4 Savage, G. C., "The phantom national? Assembling national teaching standards in Australia’s federal system" 33 (33): 118-142, 2018

    5 Schapiro, R. A., "The future of Australian federalism: Comparative and interdisciplinary" Cambridge University Press 141-156, 2012

    6 Glaser, B., "The discovery of grounded theory" Aldine 1967

    7 Jewett, A. E., "The curriculum process in physical education" Brown & Benchmark 1995

    8 Ferkel, R. C., "The benefits of health-related fitness education in secondary PE" 76 (76): 883-906, 2019

    9 Sellar, S., "The OECD and global governance in education" 28 (28): 701-725, 2013

    10 Curtner-Smith, M. D., "Teachers’ value orientations and their compatibility with the national curriculum for physical education" 6 (6): 27-45, 2000

    11 Rink, J. E., "Teacher effectiveness in physical education-Consensus?" 85 (85): 282-286, 2014

    12 Hodges, M., "Tactical games model and its effects on student physical activity and gameplay performance in secondary physical education" 75 (75): 99-115, 2018

    13 Hellison, D., "Student learning in physical education: Applying research to enhance instruction" Human Kinetics 241-254, 2003

    14 Hasite, P., "Sport education : International perspectives" Routledge 2012

    15 Bulger, S. M., "Relocating from easy street : Strategies for moving physical education forward" 61 (61): 442-469, 2009

    16 Patton, M. Q., "Qualitative research &evaluation methods" Sage 2015

    17 Braun, A., "Policy enactments in the UK secondary school : examining policy, practice and school positioning" 25 (25): 547-560, 2010

    18 Lingard, B., "Placing PISA and PISA for schools in two federalisms : Australia and the USA" 58 (58): 266-279, 2017

    19 Oh, J., "Physical education teacher education l eaders’ perceptions on a national curriculum in physical education" 90 (90): 362-376, 2019

    20 Bailey, R., "Physical education for learning : A guide for secondary schools" Continuum International Publishing Group 2010

    21 Killian, C. M., "Physical education and best practices in primary schools" Pensa MultiMedia 403-413, 2017

    22 National Association for Sport and Physical Education, "PE Metrics : Assessing national standards 1-6 in secondary school" National Association for Sport and Physical Education 2011

    23 Lincoln, Y. S., "Naturalistic inquiry" Sage 1985

    24 Oh, J., "National curriculum for physical education in the United States" 69 (69): 220-235, 2017

    25 Savage, G. C., "National agendas in global times : Curriculum reforms in Australia and the USA since the 1980s" 30 (30): 609-630, 2015

    26 Society of Health and Physical Educators (SHAPE) America, "National Physical Education Standards"

    27 National Boards for Professional Teaching Standards, "NBCT directory"

    28 National Association for Sport and Physical Education, "Moving into the future:National standards for physical education" National Association for Sport and Physical Education 1995

    29 Rink, J. E., "Measuring teacher effectiveness in physical education" 84 (84): 407-418, 2013

    30 Apple, M. W., "Ideology and curriculum" Rou tledge Falmer 2018

    31 Hursh, D., "High-stakes testing and the decline of teaching and learning : The real crisis in education" Rowman & Littlefield 2008

    32 Denzin, N. K., "Handbook of qualitative research" Sage 2000

    33 New York State Department of Education, "Federal education policy and the states, 1945-2009: A brief synopsis: States’ impact on federal education policy project" New York States Archives 2009

    34 Shepard, J., "Education policy white paper on standards, assessments, and accountability" National Academy of Education 2009

    35 Ennis, C. D., "Development of an instrument for assessing educational value orientations" 20 (20): 277-280, 1998

    36 Rentner, D., "Common core state standards in 2014 : Districts’ perceptions, progress, and challenges" Center on Education Policy 2014

    37 Council of Chief State School Officers, "Common core state standards"

    38 Corbin, J., "Basic of qualitative research : Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory" Sage 2015

    39 Oh, J., "Assessment of the feasibility of a national curriculum for improving the quality of physical education in the United States" 74 (74): 37-57, 2022

    40 Wattchow, B., "A pedagogy of place : Outdoor education for a changing world" Monash University Publishing 2011

    41 National Association for Sport and Physical Education, "2010 shape of the nation report: Status of physical education in the USA" National Association for Sport and Physical Education 2010

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼