RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    Future Oriented SMART SOCIETY and Ethical Issues

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A107325389

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Purpose: This study explores the ethical issues that arise in building a community where humans can use smart technology to lead happier lives, a smart society.
    Method: Technology in a smart society is not unrelated to the human variable, no matter how advanced its level is. As humans pursue value, smart societies also need to be explored from an ethical perspective. This study provides the need for an ethical approach that emphasizes humanity in the process of building and maintaining a smart society. The research was conducted by contents based approach.
    Results: This research showed that the smart society was clarified by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and got two characteristics as follows: First, AI, which is the core of smart society in particular, fosters human nature and potentialility through automatic self-realization, human representation, personal and social skills, and social cohesion. Second, smart AI ethical standards include beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability.
    Conclusion: This paper presented a normative and substantial directions to what preparations should be made for human-centered ethical coexistence in a future-oriented smart society. The ethical virtue or a way of living could be summarized as followed: love for humans, retrospective understanding, variable dialogue, self-sustainability, tarnsparency, explainability.
    번역하기

    Purpose: This study explores the ethical issues that arise in building a community where humans can use smart technology to lead happier lives, a smart society. Method: Technology in a smart society is not unrelated to the human variable, no matter ho...

    Purpose: This study explores the ethical issues that arise in building a community where humans can use smart technology to lead happier lives, a smart society.
    Method: Technology in a smart society is not unrelated to the human variable, no matter how advanced its level is. As humans pursue value, smart societies also need to be explored from an ethical perspective. This study provides the need for an ethical approach that emphasizes humanity in the process of building and maintaining a smart society. The research was conducted by contents based approach.
    Results: This research showed that the smart society was clarified by the Fourth Industrial Revolution, and got two characteristics as follows: First, AI, which is the core of smart society in particular, fosters human nature and potentialility through automatic self-realization, human representation, personal and social skills, and social cohesion. Second, smart AI ethical standards include beneficence, non-maleficence, autonomy, justice, and explicability.
    Conclusion: This paper presented a normative and substantial directions to what preparations should be made for human-centered ethical coexistence in a future-oriented smart society. The ethical virtue or a way of living could be summarized as followed: love for humans, retrospective understanding, variable dialogue, self-sustainability, tarnsparency, explainability.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "https://www.ictworks.org/"

    2 "https://www.foreignaffairs.com/"

    3 "http:// intelligence.weforum.org/"

    4 Levy C, "Towards a Smart Society"

    5 서은숙, "The Super-Aged Multiculturalism in South Korea and the Necessity of Wearable AI Ethics" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 34-41, 2020

    6 Oosthuizen J, "The Determinants of Fourth Industrial Revolution Leasdership Dexterity: A Proposed Framework for 4IR-intelligence and Subsequent 4IR Leadership Development" 2017

    7 이재범, "Suggestions for Using AI in Preparation for a Super-Aging Society" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 57-64, 2020

    8 Jeong J, "Study on Targets and Methods of Personal Information Risk in Smart Society" 16 (16): 113-136, 2013

    9 Lee J, "Protection of Personal Information in Cyberspace" 12 : 51-62, 2007

    10 Joldersman CW, "Neuroscience and Education: A Philosophical Appraisal" Taylor & Francis 2016

    1 "https://www.ictworks.org/"

    2 "https://www.foreignaffairs.com/"

    3 "http:// intelligence.weforum.org/"

    4 Levy C, "Towards a Smart Society"

    5 서은숙, "The Super-Aged Multiculturalism in South Korea and the Necessity of Wearable AI Ethics" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 34-41, 2020

    6 Oosthuizen J, "The Determinants of Fourth Industrial Revolution Leasdership Dexterity: A Proposed Framework for 4IR-intelligence and Subsequent 4IR Leadership Development" 2017

    7 이재범, "Suggestions for Using AI in Preparation for a Super-Aging Society" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 57-64, 2020

    8 Jeong J, "Study on Targets and Methods of Personal Information Risk in Smart Society" 16 (16): 113-136, 2013

    9 Lee J, "Protection of Personal Information in Cyberspace" 12 : 51-62, 2007

    10 Joldersman CW, "Neuroscience and Education: A Philosophical Appraisal" Taylor & Francis 2016

    11 Levy N, "Neuroethics" Cambridge University 2007

    12 Yeojin Lim, "Implications of Emotional Coaching and Integrated Art Therapy Teaching Method on Leadership Education in the AI Era" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 42-49, 2020

    13 Kim Tae-woong, "IR4.0 and Ethical Tasks of AI" J-INSTITUTE 4 (4): 6-13, 2019

    14 2020 Centennial Lab, "Future Possiblities Report 2020" Ministry of Cabinet Affairs and the Future 2020

    15 Ashley KD, "Artificial Intelligence and Legal Analytics" Cambridge University 2017

    16 Yi Li, "AI Ethics and Privacy Right" J-INSTITUTE 5 (5): 27-33, 2020

    17 Floridi L, "AI 4 People -An Ethical Framework for a Good AI Society: Opportunities, Risks, Principles, and Recommendations-" 28 : 689-707, 2018

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2025 평가 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
    2022-06-01 등재 등재후보학술지 취소
    2020-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼