강의평가 실태조사를 통한 강의평가 개선 방향 연구 = How to improve course evaluation?

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Student feedback can facilitate teaching improvements. The most common form of student feedback is obtained from end of semester student evaluations. However, there are controversial issues regarding the credibility and reliability of the evaluation questionnaire. This study examined whether professors utilize course evaluation results to improve their courses and the course evaluation instrument is credible enough to be used as a personal evaluation criteria. The study subjects included course evaluation records from two different size universities. One university used one-type evaluation questionnaire for all the courses and the university used 13 different questionnaires based on teaching methods. For the ensuring the credibility, the study observed the number of responses that were marked in the same scale to find if there is any difference based on the instrument type used. Research results showed that most professors were using course evaluation results as a good source to improve their courses for the next semester. They also were willing to use mid-term semester evaluation if school offers for better providing courses. When analyzing course evaluation, more than 50% of the responses were marked in the same scale regardless the type of evaluation instrument. This study revealed that the course evaluation instrument that is currently being used is not reliable enough to measure the effectiveness of the courses.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 한신일, "한국대학의 강의평가실태 분석" 한국교육행정학회 23 (23): 379-404, 2005

2 양미경, "학생의 평정에 의거한 대학 강의평가의 의의와 한계" 한국교육원리학회 13 (13): 93-122, 2008

3 황건, "학생들에 의한 성형외과학 실습평가" 14 : 43-249, 2002

4 박석건, "일게 의과대학에서 기존의 강의평가에 대한 학생들의 반응" 15 (15): 1-7, 2003

5 김학일, "이공계 강의평가 결과의 실증적 분석을 통한 강의평가제도 개선방안" 한국공학교육학회 10 (10): 58-77, 2007

6 백순근, "위계선형모형을 활용한 대학생의 강의평가 분석 - S대학교 교양강의를 중심으로 -" 한국교육평가학회 21 (21): 1-24, 2008

7 이민우, "외국인 유학생의 교육 만족도 제고를 위한 한국어 강의평가 문항개발과 중요도 분석" 이중언어학회 38 : 369-388, 2008

8 홍경선, "대학교 강의평가에 나타난 일관적 응답 분석" 한국교육정보미디어학회 12 (12): 97-127, 2006

9 지은림, "대학 영어사용 강좌의 질적 제고를 위한 강의평가 문항분석에 관한 연구" 한국교육학회 44 (44): 57-77, 2006

10 이성호, "교육과정 개발과 평가" 양서원 2004

11 이성흠, "교수설계 이론에 근거한 대학 강의평가 도구개발을 위한 기초연구" 17 : 81-108, 2001

12 맥그로우컨설팅그룹, "교수강의 평가제" 맥그로우컨설팅그룹

13 김명화, "강의평가의 타당도와 신뢰도" 교육연구소 6 (6): 1-24, 2005

14 조장식, "강의평가에 대한 균등화방법의 비교" 한국데이터정보과학회 20 (20): 65-75, 2009

15 Theall et.al., "The student ratings debate in Are they valid? How can we best use them" Jossy-Bass 2001

16 Marsh, H. W, "Students' evaluations of teaching effectiveness in The stability of mean ratings of the same teachers over 13 year period" 7 : 303-314, 1991

17 Kulik,J.A, "Student ratings: validity, utility, and controversy" 109 : 9-25, 2001

18 Centra, J. A, "Self-ratings of college teachers in A comparison with student ratings" 10 : 287-295, 1973

19 Glassick et al., "Scholarship assessed: evaluation of the professorate" Jossey-Bass 1977

20 Mckeachie,W.J, "Research on college teaching: The historical background" 82 : 189-200, 1996

21 Barke C. R, "Relationship between course entry attitudes and end-of-course rating" 75 : 75-85, 1983

22 McKeachie,W.J, "McKeachie's Teaching Tips, 11th Edition" Houghton Mifflin Company 2002

23 Marincovich,M, "Ending the disconnect between the student evaluation of teaching and the improvement of teaching: A faculty developer's plea" East Lansing, MI:National Center for Research on Teacher Learning 1998

24 Hayward,P.A, "Developing ourselves through the use of midsemester evaluation, Paper presented at the meeting of the Georgia Communication Association"

25 Murray,H.G, "Classroom teaching behaviors related to college teaching effectiveness" 23 : 21-34, 1985

26 Angelo, T. A.., "Classroom assessment techniques in A handbook for college teachers, 2nd edition" Jossey-Base publishers 1993

27 Bernsetein,D, "A Department system for balancing the development and evaluation of college teaching in A commentary on Cavanagh" Innovative higher education. 1996