탈 포섭도그마의 법인식작업과 법관의 법감정 새만금 판결의 소수반대의견을 주목하며- = Law Recognition Work of Breaking from Subsumption Dogma and Judge`s Law Emotion -Noting Dissenting Opinion of Saemangeum Adjudication-

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this paper, the concept of recognition may be defined as ``perception acts`` as a kind of ``mental work of fusion and composition`` that includes ``sense`` of the elements of intuitive emotional reaction with ``cognitive work`` which means ``reasonable grounds work`` to include an element of form ``logical reasoning``. In this premise, whether comprehending anything in ``the discovery of the law``, ``materialization of law`` or ``formation of law``, or understanding as complex, there is law recognition work to get up to ``legal assurance`` within comprehensive meaning ``mental work``, that is the concept of ``recognition``. Unlike traditional 3 steps theory, in view of the ``Legal interpretation theory`` to comprehend the process leading to the ``legal assurance`` as the process of a kind of ``cycle awareness`` that judge turns the eye against a law and the situation, judge, subject of recognition, is assumed also not, so called, ``automatic inclusion machine``(Subsumtionsautomat) to apply law text to the situation by a mechanical analysis, but ``self-interpreting being`` to do introspection about ``self`` ordinarily before or in work of law interpretation and situation analysis putting the whole of his personality. So to speak, it comprehend that judge as the subject of recognition is provided as a kind of mediator to be also the subject of interpretation. The judge provided as a mediator is not ``ideal judge`` but ``real-world judge``. Therefore, beyond traditional law methodology that focus only on how the ``ideal reasoning``, it is necessary to note attribute and limit of the ``judges of the real world`` as the subject of feeling and desire to have a view of the world and a view of the value with the possibility of a rational ``reason``(Denken).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이영철, "확실성에 관하여" 책세상 2006

2 강진철, "현대법철학의 흐름" 법문사 1996

3 이덕연, "헌법 제103조에서 법관의 독립과 양심" 한국공법학회 38 (38): 349-375, 2009

4 H. -G. Gadamer, "진리와 방법 I" 문학동네 2000

5 임웅, "법감정에 관한 연구" 1 : 1998

6 D. C. Dennett, "마음의 진화" 사이언스북스 2006

7 Jonathan Haidt, "도덕적 판단에 관한 사회적 직관주의 모델" 서현사 2003

8 J. Esser, "ㅂVorverständnis und Methodenwahl in der Rechtsfindung, durchgesehene und ergänzte Ausgabe" Frankrurt a. M 1972

9 이덕연, "‘거창사건’에 대한 대법원판결(2008.5.29. 2004다33469) 평석 - ‘견벽청야’(堅壁淸野)의 군사작전과 법리구성의 구조적 유사점을 주목하며" 한국법학원 (129) : 297-329, 2012

10 K. Obermayer, "Über das Rechtsgefühl, JZ"

11 L. Margulis, "What is Life?" Simon & Schuster 1995

12 M. K. Temin, "Toward an Account of the Truth of Proposition of Law" 49 : 1980

13 P. Thagard, "The brain and the meaning of life" Princeton University Press 2010

14 F. Capra, "The Web of Life : a new scientific understanding of living systems" Anchor 1997

15 M. S. Moore, "The Plain Truth about Legal Truth" 26 (26): 2003

16 Marya Schechterman, "The Oxford Handbook of The Self" Oxford University Press 2012

17 D. N. Perkins, "The Mind's Best Work" Harvard University Press 1981

18 H. L. A. Hart, "The Concept of Law" Oxford University Press 2012

19 Karl N. Llwellyn, "The Bramble Bush" Oxford University Press 2008

20 D. N. Perkins, "Reasoning as Imagination" 16 (16): 1985

21 N. MacCormick, "Legal Reasoning and Legal Theory" Oxford University Press 1978

22 R. Posner, "Judicial Method: Internal Constraints on Judging, in; How Judges Think" Harvard University Press 2008

23 C. R. Sunstein, "Interpretation and Institutions" 101 : 2003

24 E. Fechner, "Ideologie und Recht" V. Klostermann 1969

25 M. Rehbinder, "Fragen an die Nachbarwissenschaften zum sog" 1982

26 C. Morawetz, "Faszination Gehirn: Eine kurze Einführung in die kognitive Neurowissen- schaft" Facultas Verlag 2014

27 I. Blanchette, "Does Emotion Help or Hinder Reasoning? The Moderating Role of Relevance" 143 (143): 2014

28 A. R. Damasio, "Decartes' Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain" Penguin Books 1994

29 E. -J. Lampe, "Das sogenannte Rechtsgefühl," VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften 1985

30 R. J. Bernstein, "Beyond Objectivism and Relativism: Science, Hermeneutics, and Praxis" University of Pennsylvania Press 1985

31 A. Kaufmann, "Beiträge zur Juristischen Hermeneutik sowie weitere rechtsphilosophische Anhandlungen" C. Heymann 1984

32 R. Ogorek, "Aufklärung über Justiz: Zum Problem des richtigen Gesetzesverständnisse" Klostermann Vittorio GmbH 2008

33 K. M. Galotti, "Approaches to studying formal and everyday reasoning" 105 (105): 1989