가정폭력에 대한 회복적 사법의 접근

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The universal perception of domestic violence was that the instead of intervention of law, the family members should solve it among themselves.
However, the idea that the police should respond to domestic violence passively has changed so that the police should respond active for the protection of the victims.
Because of the facts that domestic violence is more continuous, repetitive, and concealing than other types of violence and children exposed to domestic violence inherit the violent tendency, domestic violence not only requires countermeasures on the violence itself, but also, cares for the victims along with the domestic violence offender.
Together with such social perception changes, there are studies actively being conducted to establish countermeasures in the academic world as well.
On the other hand, reinforcing criminal penalty on domestic violence may lead to breakup of family.
These problems also bring concerns of encouraging the victim to conceal the crime in order to continue the marriage, in the danger of continued violence.
Consequently, the victim continues to live with the offender; this leads to the continued exposure of danger, and may end up in a dilemma of threatening the victim’s safety.
In order to prevent breakups of families and resolve conflicts between offenders and victims from the limitations of criminal justice, the restorative justice should be carefully applied to domestic violence.
This study points out the limited problems of criminal justice while perceiving domestic violence as social issues, not domestic issues anymore, and seeks a plan to prevent family breakups and eradicate domestic violence by utilizing the advantages of restoration and healing of restorative justice as an alternative plan.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Lodewijk Gunther Moor, "회복적 경찰활동" 경찰대학출판부 2016

2 이훈동, "태국에서의 회복적사법" 법학연구소 (28) : 39-64, 2007

3 김재희, "양형절차에서 피해자 진술권의 역할 -형사소송법 제294조의 2를 중심으로-" 한국피해자학회 21 (21): 217-244, 2013

4 신동일, "상담조건부 기소유예제도의 성별 영향분석평가, 여성부/법무부 연구보고" 여성부, 법무부 2004

5 이호중, "가정폭력사건의 상담조건부 기소유예제도에 대한 비판적 분석" 한국형사정책연구원 16 (16): 171-210, 2005

6 한인섭, "가정폭력법에 대한 법정책적 검토" (7) : 1999

7 김은경, "가정폭력범죄의 형사절차상 위기개입 방안연구" 한국형사정책연구원 2001

8 정현미, "가정폭력 등 관계폭력에 대한 회복적 사법의 적용가능성" 법학연구소 15 (15): 355-378, 2010

9 簡井隆志, "配偶者暴力防止法の今後~制定後10年目を迎えて立法と調査(310)"

10 高橋則夫, "對話による犯罪解決-修復的司法の展開" 成文堂 2007

11 長谷川京子, "實務から見たDV防止法の課題" 129 (129): 2004

12 Zehr Howard, "The Little Book of Restorative Justice" Good Books 2002

13 J. Braithwaite, "Shame and Criminal Justice" 2000

14 H. Strang, "Restorative justice and family violence" Cambridge University Press 2002

15 Ted Wachtel, "Real Justice" The Piper’s Press 1997

16 B. Bannenberg, "New developments in restorative justice to handle family violence" Willan Publishing 2003

17 J. Braithwaite, "Just boy doing business : Man, Masculinities and Crime" Routledge 1994

18 United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime, "Handbook on Restorative Justice Programmes"

19 김성돈, "21세기 형사사법개혁의 방향과 대국민 법률서비스 개선방안(II)" 한국형사정책연구원 2004