RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      Peer-assisted feedback: a successful approach for providing feedback on United States Medical Licensing Exam-style clinical skills exam notes in the United States

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106421240

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      PurposePeer-assisted learning (PAL) promotes the development of communication, facilitates improvements in clinical skills, and is a way to provide feedback to learners. We utilized PAL as a conceptual framework to explore the feasibility of peer-assi...

      PurposePeer-assisted learning (PAL) promotes the development of communication, facilitates improvements in clinical skills, and is a way to provide feedback to learners. We utilized PAL as a conceptual framework to explore the feasibility of peer-assisted feedback (PAF) to improve note-writing skills without requiring faculty time. The aim was to assess whether PAL was a successful method to provide feedback on the United States Medical Licensing Exams (USMLE)-style clinical skills exam notes by using student feedback on a survey in the United States.
      MethodsThe University of Florida College of Medicine administers clinical skills examination (CSEs) that include USMLE-like note-writing. PAL, in which students support the learning of their peers, was utilized as an alternative to faculty feedback. Second-year (MS2) and third-year (MS3) medical students taking CSEs participated in faculty-run note-grading sessions immediately after testing, which included explanations of grading rubrics and the feedback process. Students graded an anonymized peer’s notes. The graded material was then forwarded anonymously to its student author to review. Students were surveyed on their perceived ability to provide feedback and the benefits derived from PAF using a Likert scale (1-6) and open-ended comments during the 2017-2018 academic year.
      ResultsStudents felt generally positively about the activity, with mean scores for items related to educational value of 4.49 for MS2s and 5.11 for MS3s (out of 6). MS3s perceived peer feedback as constructive, felt that evaluating each other’s notes was beneficial, and felt that the exercise would improve their future notes. While still positive, MS2 students gave lower scores than the MS3 students.
      ConclusionPAF was a successful method of providing feedback on student CSE notes, especially for MS3s. MS2s commented that although they learned during the process, they might be more invested in improving their note-writing as they approach their own USMLE exam.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Virginia Braun, "Using thematic analysis in psychology" Informa UK Limited 3 (3): 77-101, 2006

      2 Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), "The United States Medical Licensing Examination: USMLE Step 2 CS" United States Medical Licensing Examination

      3 Henderson P, "Supporting medical students to take responsibility for developing their communication skills" 23 : 86-87, 2001

      4 Joanna Tai, "Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review" Wiley 50 (50): 469-484, 2016

      5 Annette Burgess, "Role modelling in medical education: the importance of teaching skills" Wiley 13 (13): 134-137, 2016

      6 Michael T. Ross, "Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no. 30" Informa UK Limited 29 (29): 527-545, 2009

      7 Yu TC, "Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school" Informa UK Limited 2 : 157-172, 2011

      8 Penny Henderson, "Developing essential professional skills: a framework for teaching and learning about feedback" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 5 (5): 11-, 2005

      9 A. Kuper, "Critically appraising qualitative research" BMJ 337 : a1035-a1035, 2008

      10 Liviana Da Dalt, "A model of quality assurance and quality improvement for post-graduate medical education in Europe" Informa UK Limited 32 (32): e57-e64, 2010

      1 Virginia Braun, "Using thematic analysis in psychology" Informa UK Limited 3 (3): 77-101, 2006

      2 Federation of State Medical Boards (FSMB), "The United States Medical Licensing Examination: USMLE Step 2 CS" United States Medical Licensing Examination

      3 Henderson P, "Supporting medical students to take responsibility for developing their communication skills" 23 : 86-87, 2001

      4 Joanna Tai, "Same-level peer-assisted learning in medical clinical placements: a narrative systematic review" Wiley 50 (50): 469-484, 2016

      5 Annette Burgess, "Role modelling in medical education: the importance of teaching skills" Wiley 13 (13): 134-137, 2016

      6 Michael T. Ross, "Peer assisted learning: a planning and implementation framework: AMEE Guide no. 30" Informa UK Limited 29 (29): 527-545, 2009

      7 Yu TC, "Medical students-as-teachers: a systematic review of peer-assisted teaching during medical school" Informa UK Limited 2 : 157-172, 2011

      8 Penny Henderson, "Developing essential professional skills: a framework for teaching and learning about feedback" Springer Science and Business Media LLC 5 (5): 11-, 2005

      9 A. Kuper, "Critically appraising qualitative research" BMJ 337 : a1035-a1035, 2008

      10 Liviana Da Dalt, "A model of quality assurance and quality improvement for post-graduate medical education in Europe" Informa UK Limited 32 (32): e57-e64, 2010

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2019-04-01 평가 SCOPUS 등재 (기타) KCI등재
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼