RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      기업의 사회적 책임 활동이 공중관계성과 반기업정서에 미치는 영향 = The Influence of Corporate Social Responsibility on Organization-Public Relationships and Anti-Corporate Emotion

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82671959

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of corporate social responsibility on organization-public relationships and anti-corporate emotion. In particular, this study manipulated corporate discretionary responsibilities that are believed to have the greatest effect on the public, considering the four dimensions of corporate social responsibilities: economic responsibilities, legal responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, and discretionary responsibilities. This study adopted two dependent variables such as organization-public relationships and anti-corporate emotion, because organization-public relationships have been the most frequently dealt with in recent public relations researches in Korea and abroad. Also, anti-corporate emotion is widespread across Korean society in the wake of various kinds of injustice and corruption scandals that involve some big businesses. In addition, this study tested whether involvement in specific businesses and anti-corporate emotion against the entire big business circle moderate the influence of public relations activities. Therefore, in order to examine whether corporate social responsibility affects organization-public relationships consisting of two factors namely, organization-driven relationships and public-driven relationships and anti-corporate emotion composed of two factors named as anti-corporate cognition and anti-corporate behavioral tendency, this study tested the hypothesis on the influence of corporate social responsibility activities. Corporate social responsibility activities were effective in improving organization-driven relationships and in mitigating anti-corporate cognition. The theoretical meaning of this study lies in conducting an exploratory research on anti-corporate emotion. In particular, with all the brisk discussions on anti-corporate emotion in the academic community and the business community, there have been few researches that sought to conceptually define anti-corporate emotion and empirically study it. Thus, this study`s findings are worth noting: that anti-corporate emotion consists of anti-corporate cognition and anti-corporate behavioral tendency.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of corporate social responsibility on organization-public relationships and anti-corporate emotion. In particular, this study manipulated corporate discretionary responsibilities that are believed ...

      The purpose of this study was to assess the influence of corporate social responsibility on organization-public relationships and anti-corporate emotion. In particular, this study manipulated corporate discretionary responsibilities that are believed to have the greatest effect on the public, considering the four dimensions of corporate social responsibilities: economic responsibilities, legal responsibilities, ethical responsibilities, and discretionary responsibilities. This study adopted two dependent variables such as organization-public relationships and anti-corporate emotion, because organization-public relationships have been the most frequently dealt with in recent public relations researches in Korea and abroad. Also, anti-corporate emotion is widespread across Korean society in the wake of various kinds of injustice and corruption scandals that involve some big businesses. In addition, this study tested whether involvement in specific businesses and anti-corporate emotion against the entire big business circle moderate the influence of public relations activities. Therefore, in order to examine whether corporate social responsibility affects organization-public relationships consisting of two factors namely, organization-driven relationships and public-driven relationships and anti-corporate emotion composed of two factors named as anti-corporate cognition and anti-corporate behavioral tendency, this study tested the hypothesis on the influence of corporate social responsibility activities. Corporate social responsibility activities were effective in improving organization-driven relationships and in mitigating anti-corporate cognition. The theoretical meaning of this study lies in conducting an exploratory research on anti-corporate emotion. In particular, with all the brisk discussions on anti-corporate emotion in the academic community and the business community, there have been few researches that sought to conceptually define anti-corporate emotion and empirically study it. Thus, this study`s findings are worth noting: that anti-corporate emotion consists of anti-corporate cognition and anti-corporate behavioral tendency.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 한상진, "한국사회의 신뢰 실태 조사"

      2 김승욱, "한국 사회 반기업정서의 뿌리와 경제교육" (6) : 10-13, 2005

      3 Göttingen, "정서심리학" 서울: 박영사 2004

      4 이준웅, "정서 단어 분류를 통한 정서의 구성 차원 및 위계적 범주에 관한 연구" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 85-116, 2008

      5 전국경제인연합회, "윤리경영 추진실태와 과제"

      6 강양석, "사회현상분석도전" 서울: 나남 1996

      7 신유근, "사회중시경영" 서울: 경문사 2002

      8 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론" 서울: 학현사 2003

      9 한국개발연구원, "반기업정서’의 실체 파악을 위한 조사 연구"

      10 김경수, "반기업인’ 정서의 원인과 해소 방안" (6) : 24-26, 2006

      1 한상진, "한국사회의 신뢰 실태 조사"

      2 김승욱, "한국 사회 반기업정서의 뿌리와 경제교육" (6) : 10-13, 2005

      3 Göttingen, "정서심리학" 서울: 박영사 2004

      4 이준웅, "정서 단어 분류를 통한 정서의 구성 차원 및 위계적 범주에 관한 연구" 한국언론학회 52 (52): 85-116, 2008

      5 전국경제인연합회, "윤리경영 추진실태와 과제"

      6 강양석, "사회현상분석도전" 서울: 나남 1996

      7 신유근, "사회중시경영" 서울: 경문사 2002

      8 채서일, "사회과학조사방법론" 서울: 학현사 2003

      9 한국개발연구원, "반기업정서’의 실체 파악을 위한 조사 연구"

      10 김경수, "반기업인’ 정서의 원인과 해소 방안" (6) : 24-26, 2006

      11 윤영민, "반 대기업 정서, 위기 책임성, 그리고 사과 수용 간 관련성 : 삼성 그룹 비자금 관련 위기와 농심 새우깡 이물질 위기를 중심으로" 한국언론학회 53 (53): 288-304, 2009

      12 이신모, "반 대기업 및 반 대기업가 정서와 생산성 지향적 해소방안" 한국생산성학회 19 (19): 17-41, 2005

      13 황병일, "기업의 전문성, 진실성, 사회적 책임이 기업명성과 고객의 관계유지의도 에 미치는 영향" 15 (15): 361-378, 2005

      14 신강균, "기업의 사회적 책임활동(Corporate Social Responsibility:CSR)의 효과에 관한 연구: 유한킴벌리의 우리강산 푸르게 푸르게 캠페인(KKG)20년 활동 사례를 중심으로" 한국광고학회 14 (14): 205-221, 2003

      15 한은경, "기업의 사회적 책임의 지수화에 관한 연구" 한국방송학회 17 (17): 274-303, 2003

      16 김해룡, "기업의 사회적 책임에 대한 척도 개발" 한국마케팅학회 20 (20): 67-87, 2005

      17 이장원, "기업의 사회적 책임(CSR) 확산과 노사관계에 대한 함 의"

      18 이한준, "기업의 사회공헌활동에 대한 동기추론이 기업에 대한 태도에 미치는 영 향" 6 (6): 285-310, 2007

      19 문형구, "기업의 사회공헌활동 현황과 성과와의 관계" 4 (4): 183-224, 2005

      20 안보섭, "기업의 사회 책임 활동 태도가 기업 이미지와 구매 의도에 미치는 영향 연구:공중의 목적 인식의 조절적 역할을 중심으로" 한국홍보학회 9 (9): 5-38, 2005

      21 김재휘, "기업공익활동에 대한 일관성 및 차별귀인이 기업에 대한 태도에 미치는 영향" 한국소비자·광고심리학회 6 (6): 27-44, 2005

      22 문철수, "기업 PR 캠페인으로서의 전략적 사회공헌활동에 관한 연구: 국내외 담배 회사의 사회공헌활동 사례를 중심으로" 15 (15): 343-360, 2004

      23 이수범, "공중 관계성이 기업 이미지에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구: 포스코 사례를 중심으로" 6 (6): 22-45, 2006

      24 Aupperle, K. E, "n empirical examination of the relationship between corporate social responsibility and profitability" 28 (28): 446-463, 1985

      25 Ledingham, J. A, "elationship management in public relations: Dimensions of an organization-public relationship" 24 (24): 55-65, 1998

      26 Broom, G., "Using research in public relations" Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall 1990

      27 Schachter, D. L, "Understanding implicit memory: A cognitive neuroscience approach" 47 : 559-569, 1992

      28 Broom, G. M., "Toward a concept and theory of organization-public relationships" 9 (9): 83-98, 1997

      29 Beurden, P, "The worth of values: A literature review on the relation between corporate social and financial performance" 82 : 407-424, 2008

      30 Heider, F, "The psychology of interpersonal relations" New York: Wiley 1958

      31 Babbie, E, "The practice of social research (9th ed.)" Belmont, CA: Wadsworth 2001

      32 Ruth, J. A., "The power of numbers: Investigating the impact of event roster size in consumer response to sponsorship" 35 (35): 7-20, 2006

      33 Friestad, M, "The persuasion knowledge model: How people cope with persuasion attempts" 21 (21): 1-31, 1994

      34 Gaski, J. F, "The index of consumer sentiment toward marketing" 50 : 71-81, 1986

      35 Pearce II, J. A., "The high impact of collaborative social initiatives" 46 (46): 30-39, 2005

      36 Wartrick, S. L, "The evolution of the corporate social performance model" 10 (10): 758-769, 1985

      37 Lange, C. G., "The emotions" Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins Company 1922

      38 Oliver, R. L, "Response determinants in satisfaction judgments" 14 (14): 495-507, 1988

      39 Nunnally, J. C, "Psychometric theory" New York: McGraw-Hill 1967

      40 Halme, M, "Philanthropy, integration or innovation: Exploring the financial and societal outcomes of different types of corporate responsibility" 84 : 325-339, 2009

      41 Saila, D. H., "Philanthropy as strategy: When corporate charity begins at home" 42 (42): 169-201, 2003

      42 이수범, "PR연구의 메타분석과 연구경향" 한국언론학 50년 콜로키엄: 홍보학 2009

      43 Bailey, K. D, "Methods of social research. (2nd ed.)" New York: Free Press 1982

      44 Reeves, B, "Measuring the effect of messages about social responsibility" 6 : 40-55, 1980

      45 Dozier, D. M, "Manager’s guide to excellence in public relations and communication management" Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates 1995

      46 Martin L, "I need you too! corporate identity attractiveness for consumers and the role of social responsibility" 71 : 245-260, 2007

      47 Seifert, B, "Having, giving, and getting: Slack resources, corporate philanthropy, and firm financial performance" 43 (43): 135-161, 2004

      48 Hon, L. C, "Guidelines for measuring relationships in public relations" Gainesville, FL: The Institute for Public Relations 1999

      49 Coleman, J, "Foundations of social theory" Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press 1990

      50 Myers, D. G, "Exploring psychology. (6th ed)" New York: Worth Publishers 2005

      51 Myers, D. G, "Exploring psychology. (6th ed)" New York: Worth Publishers 2005

      52 Plutchik, R, "Emotions and life: Perspectives from psychology, biology, and evolution" Washington DC: American Psychological Association 2003

      53 Ullmann, A. A, "Data in search of a theory: A critical examination of the relationships among social performance, social disclosure, and economic performance of u. s. firms" 10 (10): 540-557, 1985

      54 Luo, X, "Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value" 70 : 1-18, 2006

      55 David, P, "Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dual-process model" 17 (17): 291-313, 2005

      56 Cochran, P. L, "Corporate social responsibility and financial performance" 27 (27): 42-56, 1984

      57 Wood, "Corporate social performance revisited" 16 (16): 691-718, 1991

      58 Orlitzky, M., "Corporate social performance and firm risk: A meta-analytic review" 40 (40): 369-396, 2001

      59 Orlitzky, M, "Corporate social and financial performance: A meta analysis" 24 (24): 403-441, 2003

      60 Page, G, "Corporate reputation: what do consumers really care about" 45 (45): 305-313, 2005

      61 Brammer, S., "Corporate reputation and philanthropy" 61 : 29-44, 2005

      62 Lee, H, "Corporate philanthropy, attitude towards corporations, and purchase intentions: A South Korea study" ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC 62 : 939-946, 2009

      63 Arnold, G, "Corporate financial management (2nd ed.)" London: Financial Times 2002

      64 Maignan, I, "Consumers’ perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison" 30 : 57-72, 2001

      65 Dean, D. H, "Consumer perception of corporate donations: Effects of company reputation for social responsibility and type of donation" 32 (32): 91-102, 2002

      66 Barksdale, H. C., "Consumer attitudes towards marketing and consumerism" 36 : 28-35, 1972

      67 최세정, "Congruence effects in sponsorship - The mediating role of sponsor credibility and consumer attributions of sponsor motive" M E SHARPE INC 33 (33): 29-42, 200401

      68 Seifert, B., "Comparing big givers and small givers: Financial correlates of corporate philanthropy" 45 : 195-211, 2003

      69 Kim, H., "Cognitive processing of crisis communication: Effects of csr and crisis response strategies on stakeholder perceptions of a radical crisis dynamics" 3 (3): 1-39, 2009

      70 Lafferty, B. A, "Cause-brand alliances: does the cause help the brand or does the brand help the cause" 58 : 423-429, 2005

      71 Frieman, M, "Capitalism and freedom" Chicago: University of Chicago Press 1962

      72 Scherer, K. R, "Ausdruck von Emotionen." Enzyklopädie der Psychologie: Psychologie der Emotion (Band 3) 1990

      73 Teoh, H. Y, "Attitudes towards corporate social responsibility and perceived importance of social responsibility information characteristics in a decision context" 9 : 71-77, 1990

      74 Fishbein, M, "An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object" 16 (16): 233-240, 1963

      75 Herremans, I. M, "An investigation of corporate social responsibility reputation and economic performance" 18 (18): 587-604, 1993

      76 Angelidis J., "An exploratory study of the impact of degree of religiousness upon an individual’s corporate social responsiveness orientation" 51 : 119-128, 2004

      77 Yoo, B., "An examination of selected marketing mix elements and brand equity" 28 (28): 195-211, 2000

      78 Fey. W. F, "Acceptance by others and its relation to acceptance of self and others: a revaluation" 50 (50): 274-276, 1955

      79 김봉철, "AHP를 이용한 기업의 사회공헌황동 우선순위 분석" 한국방송광고공사 (71) : 131-151, 2006

      80 Carroll, A. B, "A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance" 4 (4): 497-505, 1979

      81 Plutchik, R, "A psychoevolutionary theory of emotions" 21 : 529-553, 1982

      82 Pirsch, J, "A framework for understanding corporate social responsibility programs as a continuum: An exploratory study" 70 : 125-140, 2007

      83 Kleinginna, R. R, "A categorial list of emotion definitions, with suggestions for a consensual definition" 5 : 345-379, 1981

      84 국세청, "2010년 국세통계연보. [On-line]"

      85 한국능률협회컨설팅, "2009 한국에서 가장 존경받는 기업조사"

      86 대한상공회의소, "2008 상반기 기업호감지수(CFI) 조사"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-06-23 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Journal of Public Relations Research -> Journal of Public Relations KCI등재
      2014-03-20 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국홍보학회 -> 한국PR학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.55 1.55 1.54
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.72 1.71 2.371 0.54
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼