RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      직장유암종의 내시경 치료 = Endoscopic Resection of Rectal Carcinoid Tumors : Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection vs Endoscopic Submucosal Resection with Ligation Device

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82407093

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: Endoscopic treatment for rectal carcinoids requires special techniques for deeper resection. There are various reports in the literature about endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR) of small rectal carcinoids using different techniques. The aim of this study was to compare ESMR of rectal carcinoid tumors by endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device (ESMR-L) with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD).
      Methods: Indication for endoscopic resection was rectal carcinoid measuring less than lcm in diameter located within the submucosal layer. 23 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors underwent endoscopic tumor resection. Group 1 (n=14) carcinoid tumors were treated with ESD using a flex-knife with a conventional single-channel endoscopy. Group 2 (n=9) carcinoid tumors were treated by ESMR-L.
      Results: There were no significant differences between group 1 and 2 in the rate of complete resection (92.9%/100%, p=0.609), mean operating time (23.6 ± 14.5 min/ 14.4 ± 5.3 min, p=0.101), and complication associated with the procedure (14.3%/11.1%, p=0.668).
      Conclusions: Both ESMR-L and C-ESD have proven to be useful and safe procedures for complete resection of rectal carcinoid tumors less than 10 mm in diameter and had no serious procedure-related complication.
      번역하기

      Purpose: Endoscopic treatment for rectal carcinoids requires special techniques for deeper resection. There are various reports in the literature about endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR) of small rectal carcinoids using different techniques. The a...

      Purpose: Endoscopic treatment for rectal carcinoids requires special techniques for deeper resection. There are various reports in the literature about endoscopic submucosal resection (ESMR) of small rectal carcinoids using different techniques. The aim of this study was to compare ESMR of rectal carcinoid tumors by endoscopic submucosal resection with ligation device (ESMR-L) with conventional endoscopic submucosal dissection (C-ESD).
      Methods: Indication for endoscopic resection was rectal carcinoid measuring less than lcm in diameter located within the submucosal layer. 23 patients with rectal carcinoid tumors underwent endoscopic tumor resection. Group 1 (n=14) carcinoid tumors were treated with ESD using a flex-knife with a conventional single-channel endoscopy. Group 2 (n=9) carcinoid tumors were treated by ESMR-L.
      Results: There were no significant differences between group 1 and 2 in the rate of complete resection (92.9%/100%, p=0.609), mean operating time (23.6 ± 14.5 min/ 14.4 ± 5.3 min, p=0.101), and complication associated with the procedure (14.3%/11.1%, p=0.668).
      Conclusions: Both ESMR-L and C-ESD have proven to be useful and safe procedures for complete resection of rectal carcinoid tumors less than 10 mm in diameter and had no serious procedure-related complication.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼