민주주의 질(質)의 개념화와 평가 = 다차원적 접근

국문 초록 (Abstract)

민주주의 질의 문제는 민주주의의 개념적 확장의 문제일 수도 있다. 그러나 또한 신민주체제에 대한 다차원적인 이해와 평가의 문제일 수도 있다. 민주주의 질의 이해와 평가는 개념적으로 신민주체제의 다차원적 접근을 통해서도 가능하다. 오도넬(O'Donnell)과 관련 학자들의 확장적 개념화는 민주주의의 개념적 모호성을 다소 증대시키고 결과적으로 민주주의 질에 대한 유의미한 논의의 기반을 다소 불안정하게 만든다.
달(Dahl)의 다두제와 그 조건에 대한 논의에 근거하여 민주주의 질의 문제를 대안적으로 다차원의 관점에서 논의할 수 있다. 민주주의 질을 다두제의 속성과 그 다양한 조건과 환경의 상호 작동의 관계로 이해하고 신민주체제의 민주주의 질에 대하여 정치체제 영역의 내재적 차원, 국가영역의 외재적 차원, 사회영역의 환경적 차원으로 접근한다. 민주주의의 궁극적인 특성인 시민통제와 시민평등의 관점과 기준에서 각 차원의 주요 속성들을 논의하는 것이 민주주의 질의 총체적인 이해와 평가에 유리하다. 또한 민주주의 질의 다차원적인 평가에서 질적 평가의 경험적인 타당성을 제고하기 위하여 그 대상, 기준, 주체에 대하여 분석적으로 구분하고 논의하는 것이 필요하다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The quality of democracy may be a question of conceptual expansion. O'Donnell and some other political scientists have tried to expand the concept of democracy in the discussion of the quality of democracy. Their efforts have led to some conceptual confusion and instability to some extent. On the other hand, the quality of democracy could be a question of multidimensional understanding, assessment and improvement. We can conceptually approach it from a multidimensional perspective of neodemocracy. Dahl‘s concept of polyarchy suggests that we can study the quality of democracy systematically from a multidimensional view. We can see the quality of democracy as a mutual interaction between the internal attributes of polyarchy and its surrounding conditions.
We can study the quality of democracy from the internal, external, and environmental, dimension of neodemocracy. The internal dimension includes some attributes of the political regime. The external dimension consists of some state-related attributes. The environmental dimension is closely related to some attributes of the national and international society. Exclusion or inclusion of such attributes in each dimension can be based on the core principles of democracy, popular control and equality. The quality of democracy depends on the total assessment of all such attributes. The quality assessment requires the analytical distinction of its object, assessing criteria, and assessor, which can lead to improve the validity of assessment.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 국문초록
• Ⅰ. 서론
• Ⅱ. 오도넬의 개념화
• Ⅲ. 대안적 개념화
• Ⅳ. 민주주의 질의 차원과 평가
• Ⅴ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉
• 저자소개

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 양동훈, "정치부패의 문제와 민주주의 공고화: 정치체제 접근" 한국정치학회 36 (36): 93-112, 2002

2 양동훈, "브라질 신민주체제와 민주주의 질: 다차원적 관점" 중남미지역원 11 (11): 269-309, 2009

3 김형철, "민주주의 개념과 측정지표: 경험적 비교 연구의 맥락. 비교민주주의: 분석모형과 측정지표" 한국외국어대학교 89-122, 2005

4 Coppedge, Michael, "Thickening Thin Concepts: Issues in Large-N Data Generation. Regimes and Democracy in Latin America: Theories and Methods" Oxford University Press 105-122, 2007

5 De Almeida, Maria Herminia Tavares, "State, Democracy, and Social Rights. In The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of NotreDame Press 211-215, 2004

6 Chu, Yun-han, "South Korea and Taiwan. Assessing the Quality of Democracy" Maryland: The Johns Hopkins University Press 188-212, 2005

7 Coppedge, Michael, "Quality of Democracy and Its Measurement. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press 239-248, 2004

8 Dahl, Robert A, "Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition" Yale Universtiy Press 1971

9 Lechner, Norbert, "On the Imaginary of the Citizenry. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 203-21, 2004

10 Coppedge, Michael, "Measuring Polyarchy. On Measuring Democracy: Its Consequences and Concommitants" Transaction Publishers 47-68, 1993

11 Munck, Gerardo, "Measuring Democracy: A Bridge between Scholarship and Politics" The Johns Hopkins University Press 2009

12 Lagos, Marta, "Latin America's Diversity of Views. How People View Democracy" 59-73, 2008

13 Domingo, Pilar, "Judicial Independence and Judicial Reform in Latin America. The Self-Restraing State: Power and Accountability in New Democracy" Lynne Rienner Publishers 151-175, 1999

14 Beetham, David, "Interrnational IDEA Handbook on Democracy Assessment" Kluwer Law International 2002

15 Ippolito, Gabriela, "In Search of a New Paradigm: Quality of Democracy and Human Development in Latin America. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 168-175, 2004

16 Sartori, Giovanni, "Giovanni Sartori's Ten Commandments for Concept Analysis"

17 Mazzuca, Sebastian L, "Democratic Quality: Costs and Benefits of the Concept. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 249-259, 2004

18 Cullel, "Democracy and the Quality of Democracy: Empirical Findings and Methodological and Theoretical Issues Drawn from the Citizen Audit of the Quality of Democracy in Costa Rica. The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 93-162, 2004

19 Sartori, Giovanni, "Concept Misformation in Comparative Politics" 64 (64): 1033-1053, 1970

20 Hagopian, Frances, "Brazil and Chile. Assessing the Quality of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 123-162, 2005

21 Altman, David, "Assessing the Quality of Democracy: Freedom, Competitiveness and Participation in Eighteen LatinAmerican Countries" 9 (9): 85-100, 2002

22 Morlino, Leonardo, "'Good' and 'Bad' Democracies: How to Conduct Research into the Quality of Democracy." The Quality of Democracy in Post-Communist Europe" Routledge 5-27, 2006

23 O'Donnell, Guillermo, ""Why the Rule of Law Matters." Assessing the Quality of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 3-17, 2005

24 Schmitter, Philippe C, ""The Ambiguous Virtues of Accountability." Assessing the Quality of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 18-31, 2005

25 Iazzetta, Osvaldo M, ""Introduction." The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 1-6, 2004

26 Diamond, Larry, ""Introduction." Assessing the Quality of Democracy. Eds. Larry Diamond and Leonardo Morlino" The Johns Hopkins University Press ix-xliii, 2005

27 O'Donnell, Guillermo, ""Human Development, Human Rights, and Democracy." The Quality of Democracy: Theory and Applications" University of Notre Dame Press 9-92, 2004

28 Rueschemeyer, ""Addressing Inequality." Assessing the Quality of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 47-61, 2005

29 Plattner, Marc F, ""A Skeptical Perspective." Assessing the Quality of Democracy" The Johns Hopkins University Press 77-81, 2005