RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    시민윤리로서 피해자 중심 윤리의 적합성과 그 시민교육적 함의 = The Appropriateness of Victim-centered Ethics and Its Implications for Citizenship Education

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A40102726

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Moral problems in modern society are giving rise to a lot of suffering, but there has scarcely been appropriate moral prescription for them. Ethical theories in modern age have been oriented toward ‘agent-centered`. These views presupposes basic trust in moral subjects and absolute reason, and accordingly, in individual freedom and its ability for correct moral judgment. Here, rightness and wrongness of an action is decided by whether or not it accords with given moral principles and subject`s rational judgment, not by whether or not it has inflicted any harm to others. Ethics, by definition, should be interested in reducing the suffering of the weak or the victims and, thus, decreasing injustice. The agent-centered ethics, however, pays more attention to the process of moral judgment than to the consequences of actions, and thereby neglects the suffering and injustice afflicted upon the victims. Also, apart from concrete socio-cultural context, it is difficult to find right references appropriate for correct moral judgments. Another weakness of agent-centered ethics is that by emphasizing the importance of rationality, a few elites assume morally superior position to the mass or victims. Also, it can cause several problems when it is applied in citizenship education. In order to supplement these shortcomings, more attention should be paid to the `suffering others` or victims. This emphasis is based on the Levinas` `other-centered` ethics. He characterizes the existing agent-centered ethics as violent and imperialistic one dominating others. He wants to re-establish the relationship with others and emphasizes infinite responsibility for others. The present `victim-centered` ethics is one that concretizes Levinas` metaphysical and sometimes religious other-centered ethics so that it may be more relevant to modern civil society. It shifts attention from `abstract or absolute other` to the facts of how much a `concrete victim` suffers for what reason and of what kind of help he needs. This is appropriate to care for those who suffers from the various negative consequences arising on the course of the development of modern civil society. It is also expected that this view may help motivating us to do moral actions by raising the problem of suffering that all men, in general, undergo. And it coincides with the essentials of ethics which pursue the establishment of justice. If this view is applied to citizenship education. it will be able to help cultivating the moral dimension of citizenship.
    번역하기

    Moral problems in modern society are giving rise to a lot of suffering, but there has scarcely been appropriate moral prescription for them. Ethical theories in modern age have been oriented toward ‘agent-centered`. These views presupposes basic tru...

    Moral problems in modern society are giving rise to a lot of suffering, but there has scarcely been appropriate moral prescription for them. Ethical theories in modern age have been oriented toward ‘agent-centered`. These views presupposes basic trust in moral subjects and absolute reason, and accordingly, in individual freedom and its ability for correct moral judgment. Here, rightness and wrongness of an action is decided by whether or not it accords with given moral principles and subject`s rational judgment, not by whether or not it has inflicted any harm to others. Ethics, by definition, should be interested in reducing the suffering of the weak or the victims and, thus, decreasing injustice. The agent-centered ethics, however, pays more attention to the process of moral judgment than to the consequences of actions, and thereby neglects the suffering and injustice afflicted upon the victims. Also, apart from concrete socio-cultural context, it is difficult to find right references appropriate for correct moral judgments. Another weakness of agent-centered ethics is that by emphasizing the importance of rationality, a few elites assume morally superior position to the mass or victims. Also, it can cause several problems when it is applied in citizenship education. In order to supplement these shortcomings, more attention should be paid to the `suffering others` or victims. This emphasis is based on the Levinas` `other-centered` ethics. He characterizes the existing agent-centered ethics as violent and imperialistic one dominating others. He wants to re-establish the relationship with others and emphasizes infinite responsibility for others. The present `victim-centered` ethics is one that concretizes Levinas` metaphysical and sometimes religious other-centered ethics so that it may be more relevant to modern civil society. It shifts attention from `abstract or absolute other` to the facts of how much a `concrete victim` suffers for what reason and of what kind of help he needs. This is appropriate to care for those who suffers from the various negative consequences arising on the course of the development of modern civil society. It is also expected that this view may help motivating us to do moral actions by raising the problem of suffering that all men, in general, undergo. And it coincides with the essentials of ethics which pursue the establishment of justice. If this view is applied to citizenship education. it will be able to help cultivating the moral dimension of citizenship.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국교육의 사회학적 진단과 처방" 집문당 1998

    2 "한국 사회의 이성과 반이성" 83 : 2002

    3 "하이데거의 존재와 현상" 문예출판사 1992

    4 "피해자 중심의 윤리" 서강대학교 인문과학연구원(편) 1999

    5 "포스트모던 다원주의와 사회과 교육:정의와 연대성을 위한 교육" 1998

    6 "포스트모더니즘과 문화 교육" 21 : 1995

    7 "칸트 윤리학과 동정심의 문제" 민음사 1996

    8 "차이의 정치 - 이제 소수를 위하여" 책세상 2001

    9 "주체는 죽었는가" 문예출판사 1996

    10 "좌우는 있어도 위아래는 없다" 한겨레신문사 2002

    1 "한국교육의 사회학적 진단과 처방" 집문당 1998

    2 "한국 사회의 이성과 반이성" 83 : 2002

    3 "하이데거의 존재와 현상" 문예출판사 1992

    4 "피해자 중심의 윤리" 서강대학교 인문과학연구원(편) 1999

    5 "포스트모던 다원주의와 사회과 교육:정의와 연대성을 위한 교육" 1998

    6 "포스트모더니즘과 문화 교육" 21 : 1995

    7 "칸트 윤리학과 동정심의 문제" 민음사 1996

    8 "차이의 정치 - 이제 소수를 위하여" 책세상 2001

    9 "주체는 죽었는가" 문예출판사 1996

    10 "좌우는 있어도 위아래는 없다" 한겨레신문사 2002

    11 "인간의 얼굴:탈주와 희귀 사이에서" 민음사. 1999

    12 "이론과 실천: 도덕철학적 탐구" 철학과현실사. 2001

    13 "이기적 불신의 비합리성과 시민공동체의 유대 아산사회복지사업재단 한국의 시민윤리" 1991

    14 "윤리학과 도덕교육 1" 인간사랑 1996

    15 "윤리와 무한" 19812000

    16 "악에 대한 의식에 관한 에세이" 19932001

    17 "시민성과 시민윤리" 83 : 2002

    18 "시민사회의 도덕원칙으로서 합리적 이기주의와 그 가치-도덕교육적 함의" 1994

    19 "시민사회 개념과 시민사회 형성" 한울 1995

    20 "시간과 타자" 문예출판사 19791996

    21 "레비나스 타자 윤리학" 인간사랑 2001

    22 "레비나스 철학에서 주체성과 타자 후설과 현대철학" 한국현상학회 1990

    23 "도덕적 인간과 비도덕적 사회" 문예출판사 19601992

    24 "고통받는 인간" 서울대학교출판부 1995

    25 "an essay on the philosophical psychology of moral development and education" 1991

    26 "Three challenges to ethics" Oxford University Press 20012001

    27 "The nature of social studies" 1978

    28 "The faces of injustice" Yale University Press 1990

    29 "The cared-for" University of Pennsylvania Press. 19961996

    30 "The University of Chicago Press" 1958

    31 "On the social management of moral proximity" 1990

    32 "Levinas: An introduction. Blackwell Publishers Ltd" 다산글방 19962001

    33 "Introduction to the reading of Hegel 역사와 현실 변증법 헤겔철학의 현대적 접근" Cornell University Press 19691981

    34 "Education at the crossroads Philosophy of Education" Yale University Press Macmillian Publishing Co Inc 19601990

    35 "Democracy and social injustice" Rowman & Littlefield publishers, Inc. 1995

    36 "A theory of justice" Oxford University Press 1971

    37 "A feminine approach to ethics & moral education University of California Press" (ddings) : 1984

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2019-06-28 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korea Association of Social Education KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2000-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.5 1.5 1.5
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.4 1.35 1.812 0.28
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼