녹지구조에 따른 경관 선호도

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There is little information about appropriate greenspace structures to satisfy aesthetic function in Korea. The purpose of this study was to analyze Korean's aesthetic preferences for greenspace structures concerned with urban tree plantings of an areal type to explore desirable greenspace landscapes. The study considered 5 structural variables of greenspace which were species composition, tree density, tree size, vertical and horizontal structure, and tree layout pattern. A photo-questionnaire was prepared through color simulations of different landscape types for each structural variable. Preference responses of an interval-scale rating from 214 respondents were statistically analyzed between landscape types and between respondent groups. Respondents preferred greenspace landscapes with diverse tree species to single species, higher tree density to lower density, larger trees to many smaller trees, multilayered and grouped plantings to single-layered and sparse plantings, and informal pattern to formal pattern. These preferences tended to be relatively higher for educated specialist and student groups than for other generalist group. Thus, multilayered and dense plantings in natural pattern including larger trees of diverse species, which are similar to ecological plantings, are recommended to increase aesthetic function of greenspace.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 서론
• 재료 및 방법
• 설문작성
• 설문조사 및 분석
• 결과 및 고찰
• 응답자의 사회적 특성
• 녹지경관 유형별 선호도
• 경관미 증진 녹지구조
• 결론
• 참고문헌

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박은영, "환경친화적 완충녹지의 기준설정" 한국조경학회 32 (32): 25-35, 2004

2 조현길, "열쾌적성과 에너지절약을 위한 녹지계획 전략 연구" 한국조경학회 38 (38): 23-32, 2010

3 Raedeke DAM, "Wildlife Habitat Design in Urban Forest Landscapes, In Urban Forest Landscapes: Integrating Multidisciplinary Perspectives" University of Washington Press 139-149, 1995

4 Choi JY, "Water Quality Management for Ecological Restoration of Aquatic Environments: Focused on Management of Riparian Buffer Zone" 20 : 20-29, 2002

5 Im SB, "Visual Preferences in Enclosed Urban Spaces" 16 : 235-262, 1984

6 Miller RW, "Urban Forestry: Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces" Prentice Hall 1997

7 David HA, "The Method of Paired Comparisons" Oxford University Press 1988

8 Huang J, "The Benefits of Urban Trees, In Cooling Our Communities" U.S. Government Printing Office 27-42, 1992

9 Daniel TC, "Scenic Beauty Estimation Model: Predicting Perceived Beauty of Forest Landscapes" 1979

10 조현길, "Riparian Forest Structures in Korea and Their Applications to Greenway Design" 환경부, 한국환경기술진흥원, 수생태복원사업단 221-244, 2009

11 Gundersen VS, "Public Preferences for Forest Structures: A Review of Quantitative Surveys from Finland, Noway, and Sweden" 7 : 241-258, 2008

12 Cho W, "Planting of Urban Environmental Forest and Community Planting Area" 26 : 70-82, 1998

13 Ulrich RS, "Natural versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects" 13 : 523-556, 1981

14 Daniel TC, "Measuring Landscape Aesthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method" USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Ranger Experiment Station 1976

15 Hull RB, "Measurement of Scenic Beauty: The Law of Comparative Judgement and Scenic Beauty Estimation Procedures" 30 : 1084-1096, 1984

16 Ulrich RS, "Human Responses to Vegetation and Landscapes" 13 : 29-44, 1986

17 Lien JN, "Extension of Visual Quality Models for Urban Forests" 22 : 245-254, 1986

18 Schroeder HW, "Estimating Park Tree Density to Maximize Landscape Aesthetics" 23 : 325-333, 1986

19 Jo HK, "Energy Saving and Reduction of Atmospheric CO2 Concentration by, and Planning Guideline for Urban Greenspace" 27 : 38-47, 2000

20 Saaty TL, "Decision Making for Leaders: The Analytic Hierarchy Process for Decisions in a Complex World" RWS Publications 1999