RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      Testing Usage-Based Approaches to Assessing EFL Learners’ Development of English Argument Structure Constructions

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106927698

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Usage-based approaches to language acquisition explain language development as a gradual process of generalizing constructions through language experience. This study investigated second language learners’ development of constructional knowledge from the perspective of usage-based language development. A total of 169 Korean EFL students at five grade levels completed a sentence-sorting and a translation task. Results of the sorting task showed stronger constructional sorting as the learners’ grade level increased. Additionally, the sorting of intermediate-level learners was influenced by verb semantics such that the sentences including light verbs were more strongly clustered according to constructions than the sentences with heavy verbs, suggesting learners’ reliance on light verbs in the early stages of constructional development. Results of the translation task demonstrated a higher translation accuracy with increasing proficiency, but with a significant amount of variation across individual constructions contingent on the constructions’ syntactic and semantic complexity. Overall, our findings confirm the usage-based development of L2 learning.
      번역하기

      Usage-based approaches to language acquisition explain language development as a gradual process of generalizing constructions through language experience. This study investigated second language learners’ development of constructional knowledge fro...

      Usage-based approaches to language acquisition explain language development as a gradual process of generalizing constructions through language experience. This study investigated second language learners’ development of constructional knowledge from the perspective of usage-based language development. A total of 169 Korean EFL students at five grade levels completed a sentence-sorting and a translation task. Results of the sorting task showed stronger constructional sorting as the learners’ grade level increased. Additionally, the sorting of intermediate-level learners was influenced by verb semantics such that the sentences including light verbs were more strongly clustered according to constructions than the sentences with heavy verbs, suggesting learners’ reliance on light verbs in the early stages of constructional development. Results of the translation task demonstrated a higher translation accuracy with increasing proficiency, but with a significant amount of variation across individual constructions contingent on the constructions’ syntactic and semantic complexity. Overall, our findings confirm the usage-based development of L2 learning.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 양현권, "외국어교육의 구조적 기반으로서의 목표어의 언어 체계" 한국어교육학회 (133) : 63-81, 2010

      2 Akhtar, N., "Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology" 33 (33): 952-965, 1997

      3 김현우, "Young EFL students’ reliance on path-breaking verbs in the use of English argument structure constructions" 인지과학연구소 18 (18): 341-366, 2017

      4 Ellis, N. C., "Usage‐based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition" 63 (63): 25-51, 2013

      5 Barlow, M., "Usage-based models of language" Stanford University, CSLI 2000

      6 Langacker, R., "Usage based models of language" Stanford University, CSLI 1-60, 2000

      7 Shim, J. Y., "The tense of resultatives: The case of Korean" University of Massachusetts, GLSA 2 : 337-350, 2007

      8 Childers, J. B., "The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction" 37 (37): 739-748, 2001

      9 Theakston, A., "The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure" 28 (28): 127-152, 2001

      10 Ahrens, K. V., "The mental representation of verbs" University of California at San Diego 1995

      1 양현권, "외국어교육의 구조적 기반으로서의 목표어의 언어 체계" 한국어교육학회 (133) : 63-81, 2010

      2 Akhtar, N., "Young children’s productivity with word order and verb morphology" 33 (33): 952-965, 1997

      3 김현우, "Young EFL students’ reliance on path-breaking verbs in the use of English argument structure constructions" 인지과학연구소 18 (18): 341-366, 2017

      4 Ellis, N. C., "Usage‐based language: Investigating the latent structures that underpin acquisition" 63 (63): 25-51, 2013

      5 Barlow, M., "Usage-based models of language" Stanford University, CSLI 2000

      6 Langacker, R., "Usage based models of language" Stanford University, CSLI 1-60, 2000

      7 Shim, J. Y., "The tense of resultatives: The case of Korean" University of Massachusetts, GLSA 2 : 337-350, 2007

      8 Childers, J. B., "The role of pronouns in young children’s acquisition of the English transitive construction" 37 (37): 739-748, 2001

      9 Theakston, A., "The role of performance limitations in the acquisition of verb argument structure" 28 (28): 127-152, 2001

      10 Ahrens, K. V., "The mental representation of verbs" University of California at San Diego 1995

      11 Bencini, G. M. L., "The contribution of argument structure constructions to sentence meaning" 43 (43): 640-651, 2000

      12 Sethuraman, N., "The acquisition of verbs and argument structure construction" University of California 2002

      13 Liang, J., "Sentence comprehension by Chinese learners of English: Verb-centered or construction-based" Guangdong University of Foreign Studies 2002

      14 Fillmore, C. J., "Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions : The case of let alone" 64 (64): 501-538, 1999

      15 Croft, W., "Radical construction grammar : Syntactic theory in typological perspective" Oxford University Press 2001

      16 Ninio, A., "Pathbreaking verbs in syntactic development and the question of prototypical transitivity" 26 (26): 619-653, 1999

      17 Snyder, W., "On the nature of syntactic variation : Evidence from complex predicates and complex word-formation" 77 (77): 324-342, 2001

      18 신규호, "On the Contribution of Argument Structure Constructions to Sentence Meaning for Korean Learners of English" 한국영어교육학회 65 (65): 209-227, 2010

      19 Farrar, J., "Negative evidence and grammatical morpheme acquisition" 28 (28): 90-98, 1992

      20 Clark, E., "Mechanisms of language acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum 1-33, 1987

      21 Bates, E., "Mechanisms of language acquisition" Lawrence Erlbaum 157-193, 1987

      22 Goldberg, A. E., "Learning argument structure generalizations" 15 (15): 289-316, 2004

      23 Pinker, S., "Learnability and cognition: The acquisition of argument structure" Harvard University Press 1989

      24 Keijzer, M., "Last in first out? An investigation of the regression hypothesis in Dutch emigrants in Anglophone Canada" Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam 2007

      25 Year, J., "Korean speakers’ acquisition of the English ditransitive construction : The role of verb prototype, input distribution, and frequency" 93 (93): 399-417, 2009

      26 이진화, "Korean College Students' Knowledge on English Argument Structure Constructions Depending on English Proficiency" 한국영어학회 16 (16): 121-142, 2016

      27 Xu, Q., "Item-based foreign language learning of give ditransitive constructions : Evidence from corpus research" 63 : 65-76, 2016

      28 Ellis N. C., "Handbook of second language acquisition" Blackwell 33-68, 2003

      29 Ellis, N. C., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition" Routledge 372-405, 2008

      30 Bybee, J., "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition" Routledge 216-236, 2008

      31 Goldberg, A. E, "Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition" Routledge 197-215, 2008

      32 MacWhinney, B., "Handbook of bilingualism: Psycholinguistic approaches" Oxford University Press 49-67, 2005

      33 Tomasello, M., "First verbs: A case study of early grammatical development" Cambridge University Press 1992

      34 Casenhiser, D., "Fast mapping of a phrasal form and meaning" 8 (8): 500-508, 2005

      35 Kim, H., "Effects of verb semantics and proficiency in second language use of constructional knowledge" 100 (100): 716-731, 2016

      36 Lee, J., "Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents" 52 : 38-50, 2015

      37 Gries, S. T., "Do foreign language learners also have constructions?" 3 (3): 182-200, 2005

      38 Redington, M., "Distributional information : A powerful cue for acquiring syntactic categories" 22 (22): 425-469, 1998

      39 Farrar, J., "Discourse and the acquisition of grammatical morphemes" 17 (17): 607-624, 1990

      40 Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions at work: The nature of generalization in language" Oxford University Press 2006

      41 Goldberg, A. E., "Constructions : A construction grammar approach to argument structure" University of Chicago Press 1995

      42 Kim H., "Constructional processing in a second language : The role of constructional knowledge in verb-construction integration" 69 (69): 1022-1056, 2019

      43 Rah, Y., "Construction-based approach to teaching the English resultative construction to Korean EFL learners" 72 : 1-12, 2018

      44 Ellis, N. C., "Constructing a second language: Analyses and computational simulations of the emergence of linguistic constructions from usage" 59 (59): 90-125, 2009

      45 Tomasello, M., "Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition" Harvard University Press 2003

      46 Holme, R., "Cognitive linguistics and the second language classroom" 46 (46): 6-29, 2012

      47 Langacker, R. W., "Cognitive grammar : A basic introduction" Oxford University Press 2008

      48 Valenzuela, J., "Cognitive approaches to pedagogical grammar" De Gruyter Mouton 198-230, 2008

      49 Sethuraman, N., "Children’s mastery of the transitive construction" Stanford University, CSLI 60-67, 2004

      50 Goldberg, A. E., "Argument structure constructions versus lexical rules or derivational verb templates" 28 (28): 435-465, 2013

      51 Sung, M., "Applied construction grammar" De Gruyter Mouton 89-114, 2016

      52 Dodson, K., "Acquiring the transitive construction in English : The role of animacy and pronouns" 25 (25): 555-574, 1998

      53 Akhtar, N., "Acquiring basic word order : Evidence for data-driven learning of syntactic structure" 26 (26): 339-356, 1999

      54 Cameron-Faulkner, T., "A construction based analysis of child directed speech" 27 (27): 843-873, 2003

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.79
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.84 0.81 1.585 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼