RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    조직문화 연구의 동향과 과제 = Organizational Culture Research : Trends and Challenges in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76443992

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    국문 초록 (Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    본 연구는 55편의 국내 조직문화 연구논문에 대한 서술적 분석과 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑴과 ⑵를 하였다. 각각의 분석에서는 연구논문에 대한 내용분석과 함께 연구의 한계점을 지적하였으며, 이를 개선하기 위한 앞으로의 연구방향을 제시하였다. 서술적 분석에서는 발표기관별 및 발표시기별 논문편수, 정량적 연구와 정성적 연구의 비중, 조직문화의 유형화 연구의 비율과 유형화 모형에 따른 분포, 분석수준 등을 조사하였다. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석은 논문의 주제를 중심으로 먼저 조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구⑴와 조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구⑵로 구분하였다. 조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구⑴는 조직전체문화에 대한 연구와 하위문화에 대한 연구로 구분하였다. 조직전체문화 연구에는 조직문화의 특성과 조직문화의 형성 및 변화에 대한 연구를 담고 있다. 하위문화 연구는 하위문화 연구의 대상, 내용, 하위문화군, 조직문화와 하위문화간의 관계를 다룬 내용이 포함되어 있다. 조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구⑵는 조직문화와 리더십, 조직문화와 전략, 조직문화와 조직구조, 조직문화와 관리시스템의 4가지 형태로 세분하여 분석하였다. 본 연구는 맺음말을 통해 앞으로의 연구방향을 중심으로 내용을 요약하였다.
    번역하기

    본 연구는 55편의 국내 조직문화 연구논문에 대한 서술적 분석과 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑴과 ⑵를 하였다. 각각의 분석에서는 연구논문에 대한 내용분석과 함께 연구의 한계점을 지적하였으...

    본 연구는 55편의 국내 조직문화 연구논문에 대한 서술적 분석과 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑴과 ⑵를 하였다. 각각의 분석에서는 연구논문에 대한 내용분석과 함께 연구의 한계점을 지적하였으며, 이를 개선하기 위한 앞으로의 연구방향을 제시하였다. 서술적 분석에서는 발표기관별 및 발표시기별 논문편수, 정량적 연구와 정성적 연구의 비중, 조직문화의 유형화 연구의 비율과 유형화 모형에 따른 분포, 분석수준 등을 조사하였다. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석은 논문의 주제를 중심으로 먼저 조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구⑴와 조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구⑵로 구분하였다. 조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구⑴는 조직전체문화에 대한 연구와 하위문화에 대한 연구로 구분하였다. 조직전체문화 연구에는 조직문화의 특성과 조직문화의 형성 및 변화에 대한 연구를 담고 있다. 하위문화 연구는 하위문화 연구의 대상, 내용, 하위문화군, 조직문화와 하위문화간의 관계를 다룬 내용이 포함되어 있다. 조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구⑵는 조직문화와 리더십, 조직문화와 전략, 조직문화와 조직구조, 조직문화와 관리시스템의 4가지 형태로 세분하여 분석하였다. 본 연구는 맺음말을 통해 앞으로의 연구방향을 중심으로 내용을 요약하였다.

    더보기

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This research reviews 55 articles and dissertations on organizational culture in Korea. Sources include the Korean Journal of Management, Korean Management Review, the Korean Personnel Administration Journal, the Journal of Business Research, Daehan Journal of Business and various doctoral dissertations.
    Following descriptive, thematic and theoretic analyses, the study proposes a future direction for organizational culture research. The descriptive analysis investigates factors such as proportion of publication periods, level of analysis, typology of organizational culture, and proportion of qualitative and quantitative research. Thematic and theoretic analyses investigate research content according to main themes and theories. Main themes are in turn classified into research focused on organizational culture and research focused on the relationship between organizational culture and organizational contingencies such as leadership, strategy, organizational structure, and management system. Research focused on organizational culture is again divided into those that analyze organizational culture as a whole and those that analyze subcultures.
    Descriptive analysis finds a decreasing trend of organizational culture research, lack of qualitative research, excessive dependence on specific typologies of organizational culture, and a problematic level of analysis. The decreasing trend is related to the pattern of prior research. Lack of qualitative research led to a dearth of subject matter. Excessive dependence on specific typologies of organizational culture has oversimplified phenomena in organizational culture. The organizational level of analysis raises a problem of aggregation bias. To solve this aggregation problem, research using aggregation must measure intraclass correlation. But research measuring this correlation are few.
    In individual thematic and theoretic analysis, conclusions are as follows: First, prior research investigating organizational cultural characteristics have not fully analyzed the effect of corporate situations on differences in organizational culture. Second, research about organizational culture formation and change have been short of dynamic process. Third, existing research has largely failed to consider the environment that is unique to Korea, such as Korean traditional culture and various social and economic forces within Korea. Fourth, excessive inclination toward specific themes tend to oversimplify organizational culture research. Fifth, research about the relationship between organizational culture and leadership fall short of investigating organizational culture’s influence on leadership and identifying variables which may mediate or moderate relationships between organizational culture and leadership. Sixth, research dealing with relationships between organizational culture and strategy do not fully explain the dynamic processes through which culture and strategy influence each other. Seventh, existing research about organizational culture and organizational structure have focused only on relationships between organizational culture and specific dimensions of organizational structure, such as centralization and formalization. Eighth, prior research dealing with relationships between organizational culture and HRM do not have sufficient macro-oriented dimensions.
    Future research in Korea are suggested as follows. First, more studies on qualitative research and organizational symbolism are needed. Second, research on organizational culture characteristics need to consider various organizational circumstances such as industry, size, and history and both private and public organizations need to be included in the research. Third, research on relationships between organizational culture and leadership need to identify mediating and moderating variables to better explain those relationships. Fourth, research on relatio
    번역하기

    This research reviews 55 articles and dissertations on organizational culture in Korea. Sources include the Korean Journal of Management, Korean Management Review, the Korean Personnel Administration Journal, the Journal of Business Research, Daehan...

    This research reviews 55 articles and dissertations on organizational culture in Korea. Sources include the Korean Journal of Management, Korean Management Review, the Korean Personnel Administration Journal, the Journal of Business Research, Daehan Journal of Business and various doctoral dissertations.
    Following descriptive, thematic and theoretic analyses, the study proposes a future direction for organizational culture research. The descriptive analysis investigates factors such as proportion of publication periods, level of analysis, typology of organizational culture, and proportion of qualitative and quantitative research. Thematic and theoretic analyses investigate research content according to main themes and theories. Main themes are in turn classified into research focused on organizational culture and research focused on the relationship between organizational culture and organizational contingencies such as leadership, strategy, organizational structure, and management system. Research focused on organizational culture is again divided into those that analyze organizational culture as a whole and those that analyze subcultures.
    Descriptive analysis finds a decreasing trend of organizational culture research, lack of qualitative research, excessive dependence on specific typologies of organizational culture, and a problematic level of analysis. The decreasing trend is related to the pattern of prior research. Lack of qualitative research led to a dearth of subject matter. Excessive dependence on specific typologies of organizational culture has oversimplified phenomena in organizational culture. The organizational level of analysis raises a problem of aggregation bias. To solve this aggregation problem, research using aggregation must measure intraclass correlation. But research measuring this correlation are few.
    In individual thematic and theoretic analysis, conclusions are as follows: First, prior research investigating organizational cultural characteristics have not fully analyzed the effect of corporate situations on differences in organizational culture. Second, research about organizational culture formation and change have been short of dynamic process. Third, existing research has largely failed to consider the environment that is unique to Korea, such as Korean traditional culture and various social and economic forces within Korea. Fourth, excessive inclination toward specific themes tend to oversimplify organizational culture research. Fifth, research about the relationship between organizational culture and leadership fall short of investigating organizational culture’s influence on leadership and identifying variables which may mediate or moderate relationships between organizational culture and leadership. Sixth, research dealing with relationships between organizational culture and strategy do not fully explain the dynamic processes through which culture and strategy influence each other. Seventh, existing research about organizational culture and organizational structure have focused only on relationships between organizational culture and specific dimensions of organizational structure, such as centralization and formalization. Eighth, prior research dealing with relationships between organizational culture and HRM do not have sufficient macro-oriented dimensions.
    Future research in Korea are suggested as follows. First, more studies on qualitative research and organizational symbolism are needed. Second, research on organizational culture characteristics need to consider various organizational circumstances such as industry, size, and history and both private and public organizations need to be included in the research. Third, research on relationships between organizational culture and leadership need to identify mediating and moderating variables to better explain those relationships. Fourth, research on relatio

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • 〈초록〉
    • Ⅰ. 앞머리에
    • Ⅱ. 서술적 분석
    • Ⅲ. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑴:조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구
    • Ⅳ. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑵:조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구
    • 〈초록〉
    • Ⅰ. 앞머리에
    • Ⅱ. 서술적 분석
    • Ⅲ. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑴:조직문화에 초점을 둔 연구
    • Ⅳ. 주제별ㆍ이론별 분석⑵:조직문화와 조직상황과의 관계에 초점을 둔 연구
    • Ⅴ. 맺음말
    • 참고문헌
    • 〈부록〉
    • ABSTRACT
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 조긍호, "한국인 이해의 개념틀" (주) 나남출판 2003

    2 김인수, "한국의 경영학 연구: 이대로는 안 된다" 한국경영학회 29 (29): 293-314, 2000

    3 백기복, "한국경영학계의 리더십 연구 30년: 문헌 검증 및 비판" 한국경영학회 27 (27): 83-126, 1998

    4 조영호, "한국 대기업의 기업문화 특성 in : 한국 대기업의 경영특성" 세경사 325-377, 1995

    5 홍대식, "한국 기업에서의 연고주의 in : 한국기업문화의 이해" 오롬시스템 218-277, 1997

    6 오세철, "조직행동" 박영사 1982

    7 김명언, "조직문화론의 자리매김 in : 국기업문화의 이해" 오롬시스템 3-27, 1997

    8 김주엽, "조직문화 연구에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국인적자원개발학회 6 (6): 123-143, 2004

    9 황규대, "유교 문화적 특성과 현대 조직구성원의 의식성향과의 관계에 대한 실증연구" 한국인사관리학회 25 (25): 65-90, 2001

    10 최종태, "우리나라 기업경영에 있어서의 종업원 상호작용시스템" 한국경영학회 3 : 161-180, 1974

    1 조긍호, "한국인 이해의 개념틀" (주) 나남출판 2003

    2 김인수, "한국의 경영학 연구: 이대로는 안 된다" 한국경영학회 29 (29): 293-314, 2000

    3 백기복, "한국경영학계의 리더십 연구 30년: 문헌 검증 및 비판" 한국경영학회 27 (27): 83-126, 1998

    4 조영호, "한국 대기업의 기업문화 특성 in : 한국 대기업의 경영특성" 세경사 325-377, 1995

    5 홍대식, "한국 기업에서의 연고주의 in : 한국기업문화의 이해" 오롬시스템 218-277, 1997

    6 오세철, "조직행동" 박영사 1982

    7 김명언, "조직문화론의 자리매김 in : 국기업문화의 이해" 오롬시스템 3-27, 1997

    8 김주엽, "조직문화 연구에 대한 비판적 검토" 한국인적자원개발학회 6 (6): 123-143, 2004

    9 황규대, "유교 문화적 특성과 현대 조직구성원의 의식성향과의 관계에 대한 실증연구" 한국인사관리학회 25 (25): 65-90, 2001

    10 최종태, "우리나라 기업경영에 있어서의 종업원 상호작용시스템" 한국경영학회 3 : 161-180, 1974

    11 문형구, "리더십과 조직문화: 연구의 동향과 과제" 한국인사관리학회 24 (24): 41-70, 2001

    12 장정아, "기업이념 유포와 수용양상에 관한 연구" 서울대 1994

    13 장성수, "기업문화에서의 두 가치: 공정성과 인정성 in : 한국기업문화의 이해" 오롬시스템 86-137, 1997

    14 배종석, "경쟁우위와 인적자원관리: 전략적 인적자원관리 연구의 비판적 고찰과 연구방향 모색" 한국인사조직학회 7 (7): 1-45, 1999

    15 이인석, "갈등 및 갈등관련 연구에 관한 분석: 서술적, 주제별, 방법론적ㆍ이론적 분석을 통한 접근" 한국인사조직학회 10 (10): 35-63, 2002

    16 Denison,D.R, "What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars" 21 : 619-654, 1996

    17 Jennings,P.D, "Viewing macro HRM from without: Political and institutional perspectives" 12 : 1-40, 1994

    18 Doty,H.D., "Typologies as a unique form of theory building: Toward improved understanding and modeling" 19 : 230-251, 1984

    19 Denison, D. R., "Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness" 6 : 204-223, 1995

    20 Baik, K. B., "Thirty- year leadership research in Korea: A literature review and critique" 27 (27): 83-126, 1998

    21 Higgins,J.M., "Then use cultural artifacts that support it" 31 : 74-84, 2002

    22 Quinn,R.E., "The transformation of organizational culture: A competing values perspectives. In Organizational culture" Sage 315-334, 1985

    23 Geertz,C, "The interpretation of cultures" Basic Books 1973

    24 Spradley, J. P, "The ethnographic interview. FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich College Publishers"

    25 Hatch,M.J, "The dynamics of organizational culture" 18 : 657-693, 1993

    26 Walton,E.J, "The comparison of measures of organization structure" 6 : 155-160, 1981

    27 Martin,J., "The Uniqueness paradox in organizational stories" 28 : 438-453, 1983

    28 Brown,A.D, "The Effect of organizational culture on communication and information" 31 : 807-828, 1994

    29 Trice, H. M., "Studying organizational cultures through rites and ceremonials" 9 : 653-669, 1984

    30 Miller,D, "Strategy making and structure: Analysis and implications for performance" 30 : 7-32, 1987

    31 Barley,S.R, "Semiotics and the study of occupational and organizational cultures" 28 : 393-413, 1983

    32 Smith, K. K., "Rumpelstiltskin organization: Metaphors in field research" 28 : 377-392, 1983

    33 Van Maanen,J., "Real feelings”: emotional expression and organizational culture. In Research in organizational behavior" JAI Press 43-103, 1989

    34 Cho,G.H, "Reading Koreans culturally: A psychological approach" Nanam 2003

    35 Shortell,S.M., "Perceptual and archival measures of Miles and Snow’s strategic types: A comprehensive assessment of reliability and validity" 33 : 817-832, 1990

    36 Begley,T.M., "Organizing U. S. business practices to manage culture clash" 32 : 357-371, 2003

    37 Smircich,L, "Organizations as shared meanings. In Organizational symbolism" JAI Press 55-65, 1985

    38 Dandridge,T.C., "Organizational symbolism: A topic to expand organizational analysis" 5 : 77-82, 1980

    39 Aiken, M., "Organizational interdependence and intra-organizational structure" 33 : 896-912, 1968

    40 Buskirk,W.V., "Organizational cultures as holding environments: A psycho dynamic look at organizational symbolism" 52 : 805-832, 1999

    41 Ogbonna, E., "Organizational culture: A ten year, two-phase study of change in the UK food retailing sector" 39 : 673-706, 2002

    42 Silvester,J.,, "Organizational culture change: An inter-group attributional analysis" 72 : 1-23, 1999

    43 Marcoulides, G. A., "Organizational culture and performance: proposing and testing a model" 4 : 209-225, 1993

    44 Schein,E.H, "Organizational culture and leadership" Jossey-Bass Publishers 1992

    45 Sheridan,J.E, "Organizational culture and employee retention" 35 : 1036-1056, 1992

    46 Martin,J., "Organizational culture and counterculture: An uneasy symbiosis" 12 : 52-64, 1983

    47 Oh,S.C, "Organizational behavior" Pakyoungsa 1982

    48 Berg,P.O, "Organization change as a symbolic transformation process. In Organizational Culture" Sage 315-334, 1985

    49 Pettigrew,A.M, "On studying organizational cultures" 24 : 570-581, 1979

    50 Beech,N, "Narrative styles of managers and workers: A tale of starcrossed lovers" 36 : 210-228, 2000

    51 Gibson, C. B., "Metaphors and meaning: An intercultural analysis of the concept of teamwork" 46 : 274-303, 2001

    52 Hofstede,G., "Measuring organizational cultures: A qualitative study across twenty cases" 35 : 286-316, 1990

    53 Kim, L., "Management research in Korea: A call for change" 29 (29): 293-314, 2000

    54 Schultz,M., "Living with multiple paradigms: The case of paradigm interplay in organizational culture studies" 21 : 529-557, 1996

    55 Klein, K. J., "Levels issues in theory development, data collection, and analysis" 19 : 195-229, 1994

    56 Moon, H. K., "Leadership and organizational culture: Trends and challenges in Korea" 24 (24): 41-70, 2001

    57 Hong,D.S, "Korean Corporate’s nepotism. In Understanding of Korean corporate culture" Orom Systems 218-277, 1997

    58 Rousseau,D.M, "Issues of levels in organizational research: Multi-level and cross-level. In Research in organizational behavior" JAI Press 1-37, 1985

    59 Miller,D., "Innovation in conservative and entrepreneurial firms: Two models of strategic momentum" 3 : 1-25, 1982

    60 Phillips,M.E, "Industry mindsets: Exploring the cultures of two macroorganizational settings" 5 : 384-402, 1994

    61 Martin,J., "Founders and elusiveness of a cultural legacy. In Organizational culture" Sage 315-334, 1985

    62 Choi, J. T, "Employee interaction system in Korean business administration" 3 : 161-180,

    63 Arthur,J.B., "Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover" 37 : 670-687, 1994

    64 Cameron,K.S., "Diagnosing and Changing Organizational Culture" Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc 1999

    65 Kim,M.U, "Definition of organizational culture theories’ location. In Understanding of Korean corporate culture" Orom Systems 3-27, 1997

    66 Martin,J, "Cultures in organizations" Oxford University Press 1992

    67 Sackmann,S.A, "Culture and subculture: An analysis of organizational knowledge" 37 : 140-161, 1992

    68 Alvesson,M., "Cultural perspectives on organizations" Cambridge University Press 1995

    69 Chang,S.S, "Corporate culture’s two values: Fairness and recognition. In Understanding of Korean corporate culture" Orom Systems 86-137, 1997

    70 Meyer, A. D., "Configurational approaches to organizational analysis" 1175-1196, 1993

    71 Smircich,L, "Concepts of culture and organizational analysis" 28 : 339-358, 1983

    72 Bae, J., "Competitive advantage and human resource management: Beyond strategic human resource management" 7 (7): 1-45, 1999

    73 Ostroff,C, "Comparing correlations based on individual-level and aggregated data" 78 : 569-582, 1993

    74 Broms,H., "Communication to self in organizations and cultures" 28 : 482-495, 1983

    75 & Slocum, J. W., "Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations" 27 : 721-742, 1984

    76 Cho,Y.H, "Characteristics of Korean large corporation’s corporate culture. In Characteristics of Korean large corporation’s management" Segyeongsa 325-377, 1995

    77 Mike,B., "Changing culture at Pizza Hut and Yum! brands, Inc" 32 : 319-333, 2003

    78 Lee, I., "An analysis on conflict and conflict management related studies: descriptive, thematic, methodological, theoretical approaches" 10 (10): 35-63, 2002

    79 James,L.R, "Aggregation bias in estimates of perceptual agreement" 67 : 219-229, 1982

    80 Hwang, K. D., "A study on the relationships between confucian culture and organizational members’ tendency of consciousness" 25 (25): 65-90,

    81 Chang, J. A, "A study on the dissemination and accommodation of corporate ideology" Seoul National University

    82 Riley,P, "A structurationist account of political culture" 28 : 414-437, 1983

    83 Kim, J., "A critical review on the studies of organizational culture" 6 (6): 123-143, 2004

    84 Mossholder, K. W., ". Cross-level inference and organizational research: Perspectives on interpretation and application" 8 : 547-558, 1983

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-02-27 학술지명변경 한글명 : 인사·조직연구 -> 인사조직연구 KCI등재
    2013-02-26 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사·조직학회 -> 한국인사조직학회 KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-12-29 학회명변경 한글명 : 한국인사ㆍ조직학회 -> 한국인사·조직학회 KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-07-04 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean journal of management -> Korean Journal of Management KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.29 1.29 1.59
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.69 2.995 0.48
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼