RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      돌봄을 통해 본 복지국가 유형화 연구: 돌봄의 제도와 문화를 중심으로 = Comparing Child Care Regimes in Welfare States: Care Cultural-Institutional Approach

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A60129006

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Care is now a widely-used concept in welfare state research. But its use is also very selective. What this study points out as limits of existing studies consists roughly of two kinds. First, The family is still an important provider of care but many studies have only focused on formal care. Second, They have not been concerned enough about cultural aspect of care. This study compares and categorizes care strategies for children in 13 OECD countries whlie also taking into account the cultural dimension and intitutional dimension of care. 13 OECD countries can be classified into 3 clusters as a result of typology(social care type, motherhood supporting care type, and family responsible care type). This research was able to find two results. First, by including informal care and cultural dimension of care in the categorization framework, it expands the scope of discussion on care. Second, by considering cultural aspect of care, it has tried to examine and interpret various care types and their effects.
      번역하기

      Care is now a widely-used concept in welfare state research. But its use is also very selective. What this study points out as limits of existing studies consists roughly of two kinds. First, The family is still an important provider of care but many ...

      Care is now a widely-used concept in welfare state research. But its use is also very selective. What this study points out as limits of existing studies consists roughly of two kinds. First, The family is still an important provider of care but many studies have only focused on formal care. Second, They have not been concerned enough about cultural aspect of care. This study compares and categorizes care strategies for children in 13 OECD countries whlie also taking into account the cultural dimension and intitutional dimension of care. 13 OECD countries can be classified into 3 clusters as a result of typology(social care type, motherhood supporting care type, and family responsible care type). This research was able to find two results. First, by including informal care and cultural dimension of care in the categorization framework, it expands the scope of discussion on care. Second, by considering cultural aspect of care, it has tried to examine and interpret various care types and their effects.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 유해미, "젠더 차원에서 본 복지국가 재편 시기의 양육정책 변화에 관한 비교 연구 : 이탈리아와 스웨덴의 사례를 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2004

      2 윤성호, "아동 돌봄의 사회적 분담 : 여성의 노동시장 지위와 계층 간 차이를 중심으로" 전북대학교 대학원 2009

      3 윤승희, "북유럽 국가들의 돌봄의 가족화 정책 : 부모휴가와 아동가정양육수당정책에 나타나는 아 버지 상(像)의 상이성" 비판과대안을위한사회복지학회/비판과대안을위한건강정책학회 (30) : 125-162, 2010

      4 윤홍식, "노르딕 4개국 가족정책의 보편성과 상이성: 아동보육과 돌봄 관련 휴가 정책을 중심으로" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 327-344, 2007

      5 Hakim, C, "Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: preference theory" Oxford University Press 2000

      6 Esping-Andersen, G, "Why we need a new welfare state" Oxford University Press 2002

      7 Esping-Andersen, G, "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" Princeton University Press 1990

      8 Pfau-Effinger, B, "The modernization of family and motherhood in western Europe, In Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner" Oxford University Press 60-79, 1990

      9 Daly, M, "The concept of social care and the analysis contemporary welfare states" 51 (51): 281-298, 2000

      10 Kremer. M, "The Illusion of Free Choice: Ideals of Care and Child care Policy in the Flemish and Dutch Welfare States, In Child care policy at the crossroads: gender and welfare states restructuring" Routledge 2002

      1 유해미, "젠더 차원에서 본 복지국가 재편 시기의 양육정책 변화에 관한 비교 연구 : 이탈리아와 스웨덴의 사례를 중심으로" 고려대학교 대학원 2004

      2 윤성호, "아동 돌봄의 사회적 분담 : 여성의 노동시장 지위와 계층 간 차이를 중심으로" 전북대학교 대학원 2009

      3 윤승희, "북유럽 국가들의 돌봄의 가족화 정책 : 부모휴가와 아동가정양육수당정책에 나타나는 아 버지 상(像)의 상이성" 비판과대안을위한사회복지학회/비판과대안을위한건강정책학회 (30) : 125-162, 2010

      4 윤홍식, "노르딕 4개국 가족정책의 보편성과 상이성: 아동보육과 돌봄 관련 휴가 정책을 중심으로" 한국사회복지학회 59 (59): 327-344, 2007

      5 Hakim, C, "Work-lifestyle choices in the 21st century: preference theory" Oxford University Press 2000

      6 Esping-Andersen, G, "Why we need a new welfare state" Oxford University Press 2002

      7 Esping-Andersen, G, "The three worlds of welfare capitalism" Princeton University Press 1990

      8 Pfau-Effinger, B, "The modernization of family and motherhood in western Europe, In Restructuring Gender Relations and Employment: The Decline of the Male Breadwinner" Oxford University Press 60-79, 1990

      9 Daly, M, "The concept of social care and the analysis contemporary welfare states" 51 (51): 281-298, 2000

      10 Kremer. M, "The Illusion of Free Choice: Ideals of Care and Child care Policy in the Flemish and Dutch Welfare States, In Child care policy at the crossroads: gender and welfare states restructuring" Routledge 2002

      11 Hobson, B, "Solo mothers, social policy regimes and the logics of gender, In Gender and welfare states" Sage 1994

      12 Esping-Andersen, G, "Social foundations of postindustrial economics" Oxford University Press 1999

      13 Taylor-Gooby, P, "New Risks, New Welfare: The Transformation of European Welfare States" Oxford university press 2004

      14 Hakim, C, "Lifestyle preferences as determinants of women's differentiated labour market careers" 29 : 428-459, 2002

      15 Wall, K, "Leave policy models and the articulation of work and family in Europe: A comparative Perspective" (80) : 2007

      16 Lister, R, "Investing in the citizen-workers of the future : transformations in citizenship and the state under new labour's. social policy : Cross-national Comparisons" Policy Press 2003

      17 Kremer. M, "How welfare states care: culture, gender and citizenship in europe" 2007

      18 Papadopoulos, T, "Greek Family Policy from a Comparative Perspective, In Women, Work and the Family in Europe" Women, Work and the Family in Europe 47-57, 1998

      19 Sainsbury, D, "Gender, policy regimes and politics, In Gender and welfare states Regimes" Oxford University Press 245-276, 1999

      20 Lewis, J, "Gender, Social care and Welfare States Restructuring in Europe" London Ashgate 1998

      21 Mahon, R, "Gender and welfare state restructuring: through the lens of child care, In Child care policy at the crossroads: gender and welfare states restructuring" Routledge 2002

      22 Lewis, J, "Gender and evolution of european social policies. Center for European Studies" Harvard University 1991

      23 Knijin, T, "Gender and caring dimension of welfare states: Towards inclusive citizenship" 4 (4): 328-361, 1997

      24 Orloff, A, "Gender and The Social Rights of Citizenship : The Comparative Analysis of Gender Relationships and Welfare states" 58 (58): 303-328, 1993

      25 Gornick. J, "Families that work policies for reconciling parenthood and employment" Russell Sage Foundation 2003

      26 Daly, M, "Comparing Welfare states: Towards a gender friendly approach, In Gendering welfare states" Sage Publications 1994

      27 Bettio, F, "Comparing Care Regimes in Europe" 10 (10): 85-113, 2004

      28 Pfau-Effinger, B., "Change of family Policies in the Socio-cultural Contex of European Societies" (18) : 135-159, 1998

      29 Daly, M, "Care as a good for social policy" 31 (31): 251-270, 2002

      30 Fraser, N, "After the Family Wage: A Post industrial Thought Experience, In Gender and citizenship in transition" Oxford University Press 2000

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2014-12-02 학회명변경 영문명 : 미등록 -> THE KOREAN ACADEMY OF FAMILY SOCIAL WORK KCI등재
      2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.44 1.44 1.83
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.97 2.02 2.307 0.32
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼