RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    근대와 공공성 딜레마: 개념과 사상을 중심으로 = Modernity and the Dilemma of Publicness: Concepts and Thoughts

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A102082288

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Publicness has been the key concept on the question of social order in modern era. In comtemporary Korean society, the concept of publicness carries many meanings depending on who uses it, which is because it is a multidimensional rather than unidimensional concept. Following the commonsensical usage of the distinction between public and private, this article defines the concept of publicness in three dimensions, i.e., ``procedural publicness,`` ``publicness as agency,`` and ``publicness in content.`` They can lie in mutually complementary relationship, but at the same time they can enter contradictory and conflicting one. It follows that in any discussion of publicness, there are always contradictions and tensions engendered by each dimension. That is to say, while the concept of publicness includes the notion of responsibility that is supposed to secure universal and equal rights of individuals, it also has to enhance solidarity and trust by binding the constituents of a group together with a common identity. In addition, while it has responsibility to secure and help realize interests and rights of them, beyond the group boundary, it also has to realize the interests of entire society. These contradictions and conflicts also appears the same in modern Western social thoughts that have attempted to construct sound social order. Consequently, from a viewpoint of multidimensionality and contradictory relationship, the last section of this article examines the debates regarding publicness that had continued in Western modern thoughts from eighteenth to early twentieth century.
    번역하기

    Publicness has been the key concept on the question of social order in modern era. In comtemporary Korean society, the concept of publicness carries many meanings depending on who uses it, which is because it is a multidimensional rather than unidimen...

    Publicness has been the key concept on the question of social order in modern era. In comtemporary Korean society, the concept of publicness carries many meanings depending on who uses it, which is because it is a multidimensional rather than unidimensional concept. Following the commonsensical usage of the distinction between public and private, this article defines the concept of publicness in three dimensions, i.e., ``procedural publicness,`` ``publicness as agency,`` and ``publicness in content.`` They can lie in mutually complementary relationship, but at the same time they can enter contradictory and conflicting one. It follows that in any discussion of publicness, there are always contradictions and tensions engendered by each dimension. That is to say, while the concept of publicness includes the notion of responsibility that is supposed to secure universal and equal rights of individuals, it also has to enhance solidarity and trust by binding the constituents of a group together with a common identity. In addition, while it has responsibility to secure and help realize interests and rights of them, beyond the group boundary, it also has to realize the interests of entire society. These contradictions and conflicts also appears the same in modern Western social thoughts that have attempted to construct sound social order. Consequently, from a viewpoint of multidimensionality and contradictory relationship, the last section of this article examines the debates regarding publicness that had continued in Western modern thoughts from eighteenth to early twentieth century.

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼