한국어 문법용어에 사용에 관한 교사·학습자의 인식 연구 = A Research on the Cognition of Korean Language Learners and Korean Language Teachers: The Use of Grammatical Terminology

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Many studies have emphasized that grammatical terminology is of little consequence in the communicative or proficiency-oriented classroom because the aim of communicative teaching is to promote interaction in the target language. However, recently, a partially opposing argument has been raised that grammatical terminology has an important role to play in classroom discourse. This paper investigates these issues by surveying learner's cognition and teacher's views on the use of Korean grammatical terminology. Depending on surveying, teachers hardly use grammatical terminology and avoid the situations where they introduce grammatical terminology. However, teacher tend to use grammatical terms in their classroom more often than is perceived. On the other hand, Korean learners respond positively to the teacher's usage of these terms. They thought that the use of terminology might benefit their understanding of grammar. Learners were more aware of grammatical terms than teachers assumed. Therefore Korean teachers may utilize terminology in a way that is beneficial to their students. However, they need to set limit in the use of terminology i.e. basic terminology. This may be determined according to the degree of necessity when the teacher teaches grammar or talks about grammar. Learner's familiarity with grammatical terminology should be a criterion for deciding the basic terminology. (Yonsei University)

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 권재일, "한국어교육을 위한 표준 문법의 개발 방향" 10 (10): 103-116, 2000

2 한송화, "한국어 문법교육에서의 메타언어의 문제" 국제한국어교육학회 189-210, 2010

3 김호정, "한국어 교재내의 문법 용어 계량 연구" 언어과학회 46 (46): 1-21, 2008

4 방성원, "한국어 교육용 문법 용어의 표준화 방안" 국제한국어교육학회 13 (13): 5-126, 2002

5 왕단, "한국어 교육용 문법 용어의 중국어 표준화 연구" 한글학회 (282) : 277-316, 2008

6 김호정, "한국어 <문법> 학습자의 문법 용어 인식 양상 연구" 언어과학회 (50) : 41-68, 2009

7 민현식, "제2언어로서의 한국어 문법 교육의 현황과 과제" 국립국어연구원 10 (10): 81-101, 2000

8 박혜림, "영어문법 사용에서 학습자의 문법학습 태도 및 문법용어 인식 연구" 영미연구소 19 : 95-126, 2008

9 김민수, "언어학 용어의 통일 문제" 국어학회 13 : 278-281, 1984

10 고영근, "문법용어와 문법 체계. in: 한국의 언어연구" 역락 267-300, 2001

11 연재훈, "무엇을 어떻게 만들까: 영어권 한국어 교육 자료의 개발" 국제한국어교육학회 215-233, 2004

12 홍윤기, "메타언어(Meta-language)를 활용한 한국어 문법 교육 방법론 연구" 이중언어학회 (32) : 383-408, 2006

13 이관규, "교육용 문법 용어. in: 한국어교육론 2" 한국문화사 149-163, 2005

14 Borg, Simon, "The Use of Grammatical Terminology in the Second Language Classroom: A Qualitative Study of Teacher's Practice and Cognition" 20 (20): 95-126, 1999

15 Krashen, S. D., "The Natural approach" Pergamon 1983

16 Berman, R. A., "Rule of Grammar or rule of thumb?" 17 (17): 279-302, 1979

17 Han, Z., "Rethinking the role of corrective feedback in communicative language teaching" 33 (33): 1-34, 2002

18 Mitchell, J. T., "Rethinking grammar and communicatio" 26 (26): 13-19, 1993

19 Faerch, C., "Meta talk in FL classroom discourse" 7 (7): 184-199, 1985

20 Ellis, R., "Interpretation tasks for Grammr teaching" 29 (29): 87-105, 1995

21 Mohammed, A. M., "Informal pedagogical grammar" 34 (34): 284-289, 1996

22 Sharwood-Smith, M., "Consciousness-raising and the adult ESL classroom”, Teacher learning in language teaching" Cambridge U.P. 197-216, 1981