프랜차이즈산업에서 관계규범이 결속에 미치는 영향에 있어서 공정성 차원의 매개효과에 관한 연구

국문 초록 (Abstract)

프랜차이즈업체와 같은 비대칭적인 의존구조 하에서 의존성이 높은 경로구성원은 전적으로 거래 상대방의 행위에 의존할 수 밖에 없으며, 따라서 상호 Win-Win 체제 구축을 위해서는 파트너간 신뢰와 결속을 증가시켜 관계의 질을 향상시킴으로써 거래구성원간 장기적인 협력 관계를 지속시켜야 한다. 프랜차이즈에서 본사와 가맹점간의 관계의 질을 높이기 위해서는 우선 힘의 우위가 큰 본사의 공정성에 대한 가맹점의 지각을 높일 필요가 있다.
본 연구는 이러한 취지에서 기본 가설모형과 비교가설모형을 설정하여 힘의 불균형을 특징으로 하는 프랜차이즈 본부와 프랜차이즈 가맹점간 계약관계에서 가맹점이 바라는 본부의 행동이 가맹점의 태도와 행동에 미치는 영향을 알아보았다. 이러한 연구배경 하에 연구대상인 외식업 프랜차이즈업체의 가맹점 점장을 대상으로 설문조사를 실시하였으며, 주요한 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 프랜차이즈 본사와 가맹점간의 관계규범 차원 중에서 단결규범과 상호성이 분배공정성과 절차공정성에 긍정적 영향을 미치는 반면, 유연성은 부정적 영향을 미치는 것을 알 수 있었고, 둘째는 분배공정성은 계산적 결속과 경제적 결속에 모두 긍정적인 영향을 미치는 반면 절차공정성은 사회적 결속에는 유의한 영향을 미쳤지만 경제적 결속에는 유의한 영향을 미치지 못하여 관계 결속에 있어서 분배공정성이 더욱 중요한 요소임을 알 수 있었다. 하지만 절차공정성은 분배공정성 혹은 사회적 결속을 통하여 경제적 결속에 간접적인 효과를 나타내었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In a power-asymmetry relationship like franchise system, a high dependent franchisee must often rely on its powerful partner. Therefore, in order to build up 'win-win' systems, therefore channel members should increase trust and commitment each other to enhance the relationship quality to sustain long-term cooperative relationships. First of all, to increase the relationship quality in franchise system, franchisor should increase franchisee's perception of the powerful franchisor's justice.
The point of this research, I established basic hypotheses and comparative hypotheses to examine franchisor's behavior what franchisee expected which influences on franchisee's attitude and behavior in power?asymmetry relationship in franchise system.
For the purpose of the empirical testing, managers of franchisee in the food service industry of Korea had been selected and analyzed, and major findings in this study as follow:
First, the relational norm between franchisor and franchisee increased both distributive justice and procedural justice, especially relational norm had more effect on procedural justice than distributive justice.
Second, distributive justice increased both economic commitment and social commitment while procedural justice just increased social commitment only but economic commitment. So, on the relational commitment, distributive justice was more important element than procedural justice. On the other hand, procedural justice had indirect effect on economic commitment through distributive and social commitment.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 연구 배경 및 목적
• Ⅱ. 이론적 배경
• Ⅲ. 가설 설정과 연구모형
• Ⅳ. 연구방법
• Ⅴ. 실증분석
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Oh,Sejo, "한국유통학회,유통연구 제2권 제2호,pp" 한국유통학회 2 (2): 135-151, 1996

2 오세조, "지속적인 거래관계 속에서의 관계적 규범의 측정에 관한 연구" 한국유통학회 (창간) : 239-258, 1996

3 곽동성, "공정성과 상호관계의 질의 관계에 있어 환경불확실성과 관계기간의 조절역할에 관한 연구" 한일경상학회 189-214, 2001

4 Fryxell,G.E., "Workplace Justice and Job Satisfaction as Predictors of Satisfaction with Union and Management" 32 : 851-866, 1989

5 Tyler,T.R., "When does Procedural Justice Matter in Organizational Settings in : Research on Negotiation in Organizations" JAI Press 7-24, 1986

6 Leventhal,G.S., "What Should Be Done with Equity Theory in : Justice and Social Interaction" Springer-Verlag 167-216, 1980

7 Goldon,M.E., "Voluntariness of Association as Moderator of the Importance of Procedual and Distribute Justice" 19 : 993-1009, 1989

8 Gilliland,David I., "Two Sides to Attitudinal Commitment: The Effect of Calculative and Loyalty Commitment on Enforcement Mechanisms in Distribution Channels" 30 (30): 24-43, 2002

9 Adams,J.S., "Toward an Understanding of Inequity" 67 (67): 422-436, 1963

10 Gundlach,Gregory, "The Structure of Commitment in Exchange" 59 : 78-92, 1995

11 Lind,E.A., "The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice" Pleun Press 1988

12 Thibaut,John W., "The Social Psychology of Groups" John Wiley & Sons 1959

13 Brown,James R., "The Roles Played by Interorganizational Contracts and Justice in Marketing Channel Relationships" 59 : 166-175, 2005

14 Alexander,S., "The Role of Procedural and Distributive Justice in Organizational Behavior" 1 : 117-198, 1987

15 Macneil,Lam, "The New Social Contract, An Inquiry Into Modern Contractual Relations" Yale University Press 1980

16 Allen,Natalie J., "The Measurement and Antecedents of Affective, Continuance and Normative Commitment to the Organization" 63 (63): 1-18, 1990

17 Geyskens,Inge, "The Effects of Trust and Interdependence on Relationship Commitment: A Trans-Atlantic Study" 31 : 516-532, 1996

18 Kumar,Nirmalya, "The Effects of Supplier Fairness on Vulnerable Resellers" 32 : 54-65, 1995

19 Morgan,Robert M., "The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing" 58 : 20-38, 1994

20 Homans,George C., "Social Behavior as Exchange" 63 : 597-606, 1958

21 Moorman,Christine, "Relationships Between Providers and Users of Market Research: The Dynamics of Trust Within and Between Organizations" 29 : 314-328, 1992

22 Kaufmann,Patrick J., "Relational Exchange Norms, Perceptions of Unfairness, and Retained Hostility in Commercial Litigation" 32 : 534-552, 1988

23 Richarda,Orlando C., "Procedural voice and distributive justice: their influence on mentoring career help and other outcomes" 55 : 725-735, 2002

24 Folger,R., "Procedural Justice: An Interpretive Analysis of Personnel Systems in : Research in Personnel and Human Resources Management" JAI Press 141-183, 1985

25 Thibaut,J., "Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis" Erlbaum 1975

26 Bentler,Peter M., "Practical Issues in Structural Mode-ling,” Sociological Methods and Research" 16 : 78-117, 1987

27 Brown,James R., "Power and Relationship Commitment: Their Impact on Marketing Channel Member Performance" 71 (71): 363-392, 1995

28 Noordewier,Thomas G., "Performance Outcomes of Purchasing Arrangements in Industrial Buyer-Vendor Relationships" 80-93, 1990

29 Konovsky,Mary A., "Perceived Fairness of Employee Drug Testing as a Predictor of Employee Attitudes and Job Performance" 76 (76): 698-707, 1991

30 Renn,Robert W., "Participation’s Effect on Task performance: Mediating Roles of Goal Acceptance and Procedural Justice" 41 : 115-125, 1998

31 Adams,J.S., "Inequity in Social Ex-change in : Advances in Experimental Social Psychology" Academic Press 267-299, 1965

32 Lee,Dong-Jin, "Importers’ Benevolence Toward Their Foreign Export Suppliers" 2003

33 Kim,W.Chan, "Implementing Global Strategies: The Role of Procedural Justice" 12 : 125-143, 1991

34 Price,James L., "Handbook of Organizational Measurements" Pittman 1986

35 Leventhal,G.S., "Fairness in Social Relationship in : Contemporary Topics in Social Psychology" General Learning Press 211-239, 1976

36 Blau,Peter M., "Exchange and Power in Social Life" John Wiley & Sons 1964

37 Gundlach,Gregory T., "Ethical and Legal Foundations of Relational Marketing Exchange" 57 : 35-46, 1993

38 Folger,R., "Effects of Procedural and Distributive Justice on Reactions to Pay Raise Decisions" 32 : 115-130, 1989

39 Heide,Jan B., "Do Norms matter" 56 : 32-44, 1992

40 Folger,R., "Distributive and Procedural Justice: Combined Impact of “Voice” and Improvement on Experienced Inequity" 35 : 108-119, 1977

41 McFarlin,D.B., "Distributive and Procedural Justice as Predictions of Satisfaction with Personal and Organizational Outcomes" 35 : 626-637, 1992

42 Dwyer,F., "Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships" 51 : 11-27, 1987

43 Anderson,Erin, "Determinants of Continuity in Conventional Industrial Channel Dyads" 8 : 310-323, 1989

44 Doney,Patrica M., "An Examination of the Nature of Trust in Buyer-Seller Relationship" 61 : 35-51, 1997

45 Dwyer,F Robert, "A Transaction Cost Perspective on Vertical Contractual Structure and Interchannel Competitive Strategies" 52 : 21-34, 1988

46 Greenberg,J., "A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories" 12 : 9-22, 1987

47 Tyler,T.R., "A Relational Model of Authority in Groups" 25 : 91-115, 1992