RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Parasitic Gaps in Adjunct

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103952158

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to provide the licensing condition under which an object case-marked trace can license a null operator. In section II, we have examined three main approaches to parasitic gaps which have been proposed in the literature. The pioneering studies by Chomsky (1982, 1986b) treat parasitic gaps as a unified class and look for a common licensing mechanism applicable to all cases. On the other hand, Nissenbaum (2000), and Niinuma (2010) make it possible to see parasitic gaps from a different perspective, but their treatment of parasitic gaps is problematic on empirical grounds. Nissenbaum’s (2000) analysis relies on Index Free Assignment based on Chomsky’s early framework (1982, 1988), which poses a problem since it concerns a transitive relation. Similarly, Niinuma’s (2010) analysis cannot be treated on a par with other languages since in many cases, they are influenced by language- specific properties.
      In section III, we have argued that as plausibly argued by Chomsky (1986b), Spec (CP) in adjunct is filled with null operators and that a parasitic gap is licensed by an object case-marked trace created by movement. We have also claimed that linking is an alternative to Index Free Assignment since it does not concern a transitive relation. Finally, we have proposed the licensing condition under which an object case-marked trace can license a null operator. There are several tenable reasons to argue for this licensing condition.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to provide the licensing condition under which an object case-marked trace can license a null operator. In section II, we have examined three main approaches to parasitic gaps which have been proposed in the literature. Th...

      The purpose of this paper is to provide the licensing condition under which an object case-marked trace can license a null operator. In section II, we have examined three main approaches to parasitic gaps which have been proposed in the literature. The pioneering studies by Chomsky (1982, 1986b) treat parasitic gaps as a unified class and look for a common licensing mechanism applicable to all cases. On the other hand, Nissenbaum (2000), and Niinuma (2010) make it possible to see parasitic gaps from a different perspective, but their treatment of parasitic gaps is problematic on empirical grounds. Nissenbaum’s (2000) analysis relies on Index Free Assignment based on Chomsky’s early framework (1982, 1988), which poses a problem since it concerns a transitive relation. Similarly, Niinuma’s (2010) analysis cannot be treated on a par with other languages since in many cases, they are influenced by language- specific properties.
      In section III, we have argued that as plausibly argued by Chomsky (1986b), Spec (CP) in adjunct is filled with null operators and that a parasitic gap is licensed by an object case-marked trace created by movement. We have also claimed that linking is an alternative to Index Free Assignment since it does not concern a transitive relation. Finally, we have proposed the licensing condition under which an object case-marked trace can license a null operator. There are several tenable reasons to argue for this licensing condition.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Koopman, H., "Variables and the Bijection Principle" 1981

      2 Cinque, G., "Types of A'-dependencies" MIT Press 1990

      3 Munn, A., "Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures" University of Maryland 1993

      4 Haïk, I., "The Syntax of Operators" MIT 1985

      5 Williams, E., "The ATB Theory of Parasitic Gaps" 6 : 265-279, 1990

      6 Chomsky, N., "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" MIT Press 1982

      7 Postal, P., "Parasitic Gaps and the Across-the-Board Phenomenon" 24 : 735-754, 1993

      8 Engdahl, E., "Parasitic Gaps" 6 : 5-34, 1983

      9 Contreras, H., "Operators, Binding, and Subjacency" University of Washington 1988

      10 Nunes, J., "Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement" MIT Press 2004

      1 Koopman, H., "Variables and the Bijection Principle" 1981

      2 Cinque, G., "Types of A'-dependencies" MIT Press 1990

      3 Munn, A., "Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures" University of Maryland 1993

      4 Haïk, I., "The Syntax of Operators" MIT 1985

      5 Williams, E., "The ATB Theory of Parasitic Gaps" 6 : 265-279, 1990

      6 Chomsky, N., "Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding" MIT Press 1982

      7 Postal, P., "Parasitic Gaps and the Across-the-Board Phenomenon" 24 : 735-754, 1993

      8 Engdahl, E., "Parasitic Gaps" 6 : 5-34, 1983

      9 Contreras, H., "Operators, Binding, and Subjacency" University of Washington 1988

      10 Nunes, J., "Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement" MIT Press 2004

      11 Larson, R., "Light Predicate Raising" MITWPL 1988

      12 Chomsky, N., "Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures" MIT Press 1988

      13 Nissenbaum, J., "Covert Movement and Parasitic Gaps" 30 : 541-555, 2000

      14 강남길, "Control and the Linking Theory" 한국중앙영어영문학회 54 (54): 1-31, 2012

      15 Ross, J. R., "Constraints on Variables in Syntax" MIT 1967

      16 Chomsky, N., "Barriers" MIT Press 1986

      17 Niinuma, F. (2010), "Across-the-Board and Parasitic Gap Constructions" 41 (41): 161-169, 2010

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.45
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.4 0.38 0.67 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼