This paper has endeavored to prove that the doctrine of the Avatamsaka sūtra is a realistic theory, by examining the doctrine’s originality based on the Avatamsaka sūtra’s view of Eka-yāna thought. It is established that it was the third Patria...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This paper has endeavored to prove that the doctrine of the Avatamsaka sūtra is a realistic theory, by examining the doctrine’s originality based on the Avatamsaka sūtra’s view of Eka-yāna thought. It is established that it was the third Patria...
This paper has endeavored to prove that the doctrine of the Avatamsaka sūtra is a realistic theory, by examining the doctrine’s originality based on the Avatamsaka sūtra’s view of Eka-yāna thought.
It is established that it was the third Patriarch of the Avatamsaka School, Fazang (法藏, 643-712) who embraced the Biejiaoyisheng (別敎一乘) as the basis of Avatamsaka thought, and then systematized it with all teachings of the Buddha.
In order to examine Fazang’s intention in his insistence that Avatamsaka thought is the Biejiaoyisheng, we have consulted the Wujiaozhang (五敎章) as the most appropriate work, because it is the first instance where Fazang’s position on the doctrine of the Avatamsaka sūtra is explained and the Eka-yāna is examined logically and systematically.
Furthermore, we could say that the Biejiaoyisheng in the Wujiaozhang distinguishes the Eka-yāna of the Avatamsaka sūtra against the Eka-yāna of the Lotus sūtra. Beacause, even though the Biejiaoyisheng and the Tongjiaoyisheng (同敎一乘) are the Eka-yāna, the Biejiaoyisheng claims endless meaning, whereas the Tongjiaoyisheng, means one phenomenon. In other words, the Biejiaoyisheng view is Wujinyuanqi (無盡緣起) itself rather than a metaphysical view; it is the Eka-yāna which embraces reality.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Zhiyan Souxuanji, "搜玄記" 大方廣佛華嚴經搜玄分齋通智方軌 35 (35):
2 Chengguan, "Yanichao 演義抄" 36 (36):
3 Fazang, "Wujiaozhang 五敎章" 45 (45):
4 Zanning, "Song gaosengzhuan" 50 (50):
5 Kobayashi, Jitsugen, "On the Ichijō Doctrine" 400 : 214-233, 1973
6 Kamata, Shigeo, "On Sāfaramundrā-samādhi" 24 : 35-41, 1966
7 Hirakawa, Akira, "Establishment and Development of the Lotus sūtra" Toho 1989
8 Kobayashi, Ensho, "Daijō Butten: Chugoku Nihon hen. Vol. 7" Chūō Kōronsha 1989
9 "Dafangguangfohuayanjing 大方廣佛華嚴經 (Avatamsaka Sutra). 60 vols. Chinese trans. Budhabhadra (佛馱跋陀羅). T. 9, no. 278"
10 Huiyuan, "Dachengyizhang 大乘義章" 44 (44):
1 Zhiyan Souxuanji, "搜玄記" 大方廣佛華嚴經搜玄分齋通智方軌 35 (35):
2 Chengguan, "Yanichao 演義抄" 36 (36):
3 Fazang, "Wujiaozhang 五敎章" 45 (45):
4 Zanning, "Song gaosengzhuan" 50 (50):
5 Kobayashi, Jitsugen, "On the Ichijō Doctrine" 400 : 214-233, 1973
6 Kamata, Shigeo, "On Sāfaramundrā-samādhi" 24 : 35-41, 1966
7 Hirakawa, Akira, "Establishment and Development of the Lotus sūtra" Toho 1989
8 Kobayashi, Ensho, "Daijō Butten: Chugoku Nihon hen. Vol. 7" Chūō Kōronsha 1989
9 "Dafangguangfohuayanjing 大方廣佛華嚴經 (Avatamsaka Sutra). 60 vols. Chinese trans. Budhabhadra (佛馱跋陀羅). T. 9, no. 278"
10 Huiyuan, "Dachengyizhang 大乘義章" 44 (44):
A Study on the Buddhist Pantheon in the Samguk yusa
The Problem of a Drsti as Truth Claim in Śūnyatā Hermeneutics
The Understanding of Prajñā in the Zhaolun in Comparison with Early Buddhist Scriptures
The Reason why Wonhyo bestows the concept of Mysterious Understanding Nature on One Mind
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.11 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.08 | 0.06 | 0.384 | 0.06 |