유책배우자의 이혼청구에 대한 판례의 변화 = Court opinion's change in the responsible spouse's application of judicial divorce

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

There are two types of legislation admitting judicial divorce ; the ruin system and the responsible system. In the former system one spouse can make an application for judicial divorce only if the marriage is ruined without asking the cause of breakdown. On the other hand in the latter system, a responsible spouse for ruining their marriage can't make an application and can't help keeping their legal marriage contrary to his or her wish.
Supreme Court of Korea holds a fundamental opinion that a responsible spouse can't make an application for judicial divorce, but with a few exceptions. Criticisms are raised that such an opinion goes against global tendency in divorce cases and mars the right of one's pursuing happiness, and critics contend that judicial divorce should be allowed though a responsible spouse files a divorce suit.
But if a judicial divorce is allowed according to the responsible side's filing without any limitation, it will coerce the other side(wife in most cases) a sacrifice and go against the principle of trust and good faith. So basically the Supreme Court's opinion about such cases should be maintained until the social maturity of the people and economic surroundings reach the level of accepting such cases without hesitation.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 판례의 흐름
• Ⅱ. 대법원 판례에 대한 비판적 입장
• Ⅲ. 상대방 보호의 필요성
• Ⅳ. 판례의 변천과정
• Ⅴ. 유책배우자의 이혼청구가 허용되는 예외적 경우의 유형적 분류
• Ⅵ. 결론
• 참고문헌
• 〈Abstract〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김시승, "판례로 본 혼인을 계속하기 어려운 사유" 부산판례 연구회 6 : 1996

2 김주수, "친족상속법 19판" 법문사 2008

3 김용한, "친족상속법" 박영사 2003

4 박동섭, "친족상속법" 박영사 2006

5 엄상필, "재판상 이혼 및 위자료사건에 관한 몇 가지 문제"

6 김성곤, "유책배우자의 이혼청구에 관하여"

7 신영호, "유책배우자의 이혼청구권" (42) :

8 한삼인, "유책배우자의 이혼청구" 국가고시학회 42 (42):

9 송덕수, "신민법강의" 박영사 2008

10 김용한, "부정한 행위의 해석" 12 (12):

11 지원림, "민법강의 제7판" 2009

12 이경희, "가족법 전정판" 법원사 2008

13 한봉희, "가족법 개정판" 푸른세상 2007

14 박정기, "가족법" 삼영사 2008