RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      부당한 공동행위 합의 입증의 문제 = A Study on the Proof of Cartel

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82647941

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Korean Antitrust law, MONOPOLY REGULATION AND FAIR TRADE ACT regulates cartels. This dissertation mainly analyzes legislations, scholarly works and precedents re proving cartels through indirect evidences. Proving cartels through indirect evidence is related to defining plus factors in conscious parallelism. There are also many recent cartel cases of EU discussing indirect evidences. Indirect evidences may be categorized as ① parallel behaviors, ② communications, ③ firm conducts, and ④ market structures. Generally speaking, parallel behavior and communication evidences are more important than firm conduct or market structure evidences. Among firm conduct or market structure evidences, evidences of (i) motivation for agreement, (ii) parallelism too close for coincidence, (iii) actions against self interest but giving collective benefits, and (iv) absence of independent reasons are important. The evidentiary values of economic evidences can not be easily generalized. Economic evidences of firm conduct is more important than those of market structure. Evidences of facilitating practices or furtive behaviors are less important than others.
      번역하기

      Korean Antitrust law, MONOPOLY REGULATION AND FAIR TRADE ACT regulates cartels. This dissertation mainly analyzes legislations, scholarly works and precedents re proving cartels through indirect evidences. Proving cartels through indirect evidence is ...

      Korean Antitrust law, MONOPOLY REGULATION AND FAIR TRADE ACT regulates cartels. This dissertation mainly analyzes legislations, scholarly works and precedents re proving cartels through indirect evidences. Proving cartels through indirect evidence is related to defining plus factors in conscious parallelism. There are also many recent cartel cases of EU discussing indirect evidences. Indirect evidences may be categorized as ① parallel behaviors, ② communications, ③ firm conducts, and ④ market structures. Generally speaking, parallel behavior and communication evidences are more important than firm conduct or market structure evidences. Among firm conduct or market structure evidences, evidences of (i) motivation for agreement, (ii) parallelism too close for coincidence, (iii) actions against self interest but giving collective benefits, and (iv) absence of independent reasons are important. The evidentiary values of economic evidences can not be easily generalized. Economic evidences of firm conduct is more important than those of market structure. Evidences of facilitating practices or furtive behaviors are less important than others.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 임영철, "공정거래법 해설과 논점" 법문사 2007

      2 양명조, "경제법강의 (제7판)" 2009

      3 권오승, "경제법 제 6판" 2008

      4 정호열, "경제법 (제2판)" 2008

      5 이남기, "경제법"

      6 鄕原信郞, "獨占禁止法違反の立證に關する檢討(中)" (497) : 1999

      7 鄕原信郞, "獨占禁止法違反の立證に關する檢討(上)" (496) : 1999

      8 實方謙二, "獨占禁止法(第3版)" 有斐閣

      9 今村成和, "獨占禁止法(新版)" 有斐閣

      10 正田彬, "獨占禁止法 I" 日本評論社 1981

      1 임영철, "공정거래법 해설과 논점" 법문사 2007

      2 양명조, "경제법강의 (제7판)" 2009

      3 권오승, "경제법 제 6판" 2008

      4 정호열, "경제법 (제2판)" 2008

      5 이남기, "경제법"

      6 鄕原信郞, "獨占禁止法違反の立證に關する檢討(中)" (497) : 1999

      7 鄕原信郞, "獨占禁止法違反の立證に關する檢討(上)" (496) : 1999

      8 實方謙二, "獨占禁止法(第3版)" 有斐閣

      9 今村成和, "獨占禁止法(新版)" 有斐閣

      10 正田彬, "獨占禁止法 I" 日本評論社 1981

      11 金井貴嗣, "獨占禁止法" 弘文堂 2004

      12 今村成和, "注解經濟法(上)" 靑林書院 1985

      13 村上政博, "政況證據による價格カルテルの認定(下)" (1004) : 1999

      14 村上政博, "政況證據による價格カルテルの認定(上)" (1003) : 1999

      15 田村次朗, "共同行爲の規制(1) -不當な去來制限の禁止, 價格の同調的引き上げの報告”, 經濟法講座2 - 獨禁法の理論と展開(1)" 三省堂 2002

      16 François Arbault, "The EC Law of Competition (Jonathan Faull & Ali Nikpay eds. 2d ed." Oxford University Press 2007

      17 American Bar Association, "Section of Antitrust, Antitrust Law Developments (vol. I, 6th ed.)" 2007

      18 Hovenkamp, "Federal Antitrust Policy: The Law of Competition and Its Practice(3d ed.)" West Group 2005

      19 Gregory J. Werden, "Economic Evidence on the Existence of Collusion: Reconciling Antitrust Law with Oligopoly Theory" 71 : 779-780, 2004

      20 Alison Jones, "EC Competition Law, 3d ed" Oxford University Press 2008

      21 Mark Furse, "Competition Law of the EC and UK, 6th ed" Oxford University Press 2008

      22 Mark Furse, "Competition Law of the EC and UK, 5th ed" Oxford University Press 2006

      23 Competition Committee, "Background Note by the Secretariat" 2006

      24 Areeda, Phillip E, "Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application" Aspen Law & Business 2003

      25 Herbert Hovenkamp, "Antitrust Law: An Analysis of Antitrust Principles and Their Application" Aspen Law & Business 1998

      26 Richard A. Posner, "Antitrust Law (2nd ed.)" University of Chicago Press 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.86 0.86 0.93
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.87 0.86 0.981 0.86
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼