그간 감동의 경험을 창출할 수 있는 마케팅 전략에 대한 중요성은 많은 실무자들에 의해 주장되었다. 그러나 실제 구체적인 전략을 수립하는데 있어 과학적인 뒷받침이 될 수 있는 실증 연...

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100089747
2009
Korean
감동 ; 만족 ; 척도 개발 ; delight ; satisfaction ; scale development
KCI등재
학술저널
1-27(27쪽)
20
0
상세조회0
다운로드그간 감동의 경험을 창출할 수 있는 마케팅 전략에 대한 중요성은 많은 실무자들에 의해 주장되었다. 그러나 실제 구체적인 전략을 수립하는데 있어 과학적인 뒷받침이 될 수 있는 실증 연...
그간 감동의 경험을 창출할 수 있는 마케팅 전략에 대한 중요성은 많은 실무자들에 의해 주장되었다. 그러나 실제 구체적인 전략을 수립하는데 있어 과학적인 뒷받침이 될 수 있는 실증 연구는 현재 매우 미흡한 실정이며 감동의 개념을 측정할 수 있는 도구나 체계적인 지수 개발 연구도 부족한 실정이다. 본 연구에서는 향후 감동에 관한 실증 연구의 기반을 마련하기 위해 그 개념을 명확히 정의하고 효과적으로 측정할 수 있는 기틀을 마련하고자 하였다. 연구결과 감동은 기존의 학자들의 주장과는 달리 다양한 감정들(고마움, 놀라움, 즐거움, 황홀함 등)의 복합체이며 15가지의 감정요소들로 구성되었다는 것을 발견하였다. 개발된 감동 측정 항목들은 네 단계의 조사를 거쳐 타당성과 신뢰성을 검증하였다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Effects of satisfaction on loyalty have been argued in several past literature. A weak linkage between satisfaction and loyalty was reported. Loyalty may not be directly influenced by satisfaction. Switching costs including time, money, and effort, pe...
Effects of satisfaction on loyalty have been argued in several past literature. A weak linkage between satisfaction and loyalty was reported. Loyalty may not be directly influenced by satisfaction. Switching costs including time, money, and effort, personal traits of enjoying switching, or purchase decisions influenced by promotional elements (e.g., store coupons) may be the primary factors that influence loyalty. Delight involves surprise and joy beyond satisfaction. Whereas satisfaction results from meeting expectations, delight occurs when a service is provided more than expected. Although the power of delight on repurchase intention or loyalty has been addressed by practitioners, academic evidence is currently limited. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to define the concept of delight and develop a scale to assess delight in order to provide a grounded framework for future research. Following Nunnally(1967), Gerbing and Anderson(1988), and Churchill(1979), a stepwise procedure for scale development was considered. Four studies involved both qualitative and quantitative approaches were conducted to examine the validity and reliability of the developed delight scale. Study 1 was designed to extract descriptors of delight. In the first study, literature review, focus group interview, in-depth interview, and expert interview were conducted. All retrieved delight items were then recategorized by nine items of cause (e.g., I felt he/she was thinking of me), three items of situation (e.g., I did not expect this service/situation), and seventeen items of affect (e.g., thankful, fascinated, surprise). Considering delight as affect, further analyses focused on seventeen items of affect. Study 2 was conducted to purify seventeen delight affect items identified in study 1. A total of 200 college students participated and responded to a questionnaire with a delight scenario. After reading a given scenario, respondents were asked to rate their feelings on seventeen items using a 7-point Likert-type scale (1-strongly disagree, 7-strongly agree). An exploratory factor analysis revealed fifteen items adequately explain delight and excluded two initial items of `joy welling up in my heart` and `almost cry with happiness.` Also, two dimensions of joy and warmth explained the delight construct. Joy includes ten items of `my heart was full,` `flying,` `excited,` `enthusiastic,` `pleasurable,` `fascinated,` `happy,` `feel a lump,` `magnificent,` and `joy.` Warmth consisted of five items including `thankful,` `warm,` `heart touching,` `choke with emotion,` and `surprise.` To confirm fifteen items of delight, study 3 was conducted. To achieve external validity, sample compositions were extended from study 2. A total of 226 individuals from three large cities in Korea participated in study 3. Scenarios were given to evoke delight feelings. Different from study 1, the delight experience in the store was drawn. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the relation of the scale items to the delight construct. Model 1 assumed all fifteen items were exclusive and loaded on a single delight construct, whereas model 2 and model 3 assumed two dimensions of joy and warmth explained a delight construct. Model 2 described two dimensions that are equally weighted as first-ordered latent factors. Model 3 assumed a correlation between two first-ordered latent factors for delight. Using confirmatory factor analyses, three models were tested. Results revealed that model 1 and model 3 fit the data well. Multiple affect items explained delight better than two dimensions of joy and warmth. Also, when a correlation between joy and warmth was assumed, a delight scale was explained better. In study 4, the discriminant validity of a delight scale was assessed. Among seven items of a satisfaction scale developed by Crosby and Stephens(1987), Eroglu and Machleit(1990), and Spreng et al.(1996), two items that were duplicated with delight items or similar in m
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Mittal, Banwari, "Why Do Customers Switch?" 12 (12): 177-194, 1998
2 Mazursky, David, "When Customers Switch Brands" 4 : 17-30, 1987
3 Schneider, Benjamin, "Understanding Customer Delight and Outrage" 41 (41): 35-45, 1999
4 Watson, David, "Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood" 98 : 219-235, 1985
5 Heskett, James L, "The Service Profit Chain" The Free Press 1997
6 Jones, Michael A, "Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services" 76 : 260-, 2000
7 Rust, Roland T, "Should We Delight the Customer?" 28 (28): 86-94, 2000
8 Schlossberg, Howard, "Satisfying Customers is a Minimum: You Really Have To 'Delight Them'" 24 : 10-11, 1990
9 Finn, Adam, "Reassessing the Foundations of Customer Delight" 8 (8): 103-116, 2005
10 Nunnally, Jum C, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw Hill 1967
1 Mittal, Banwari, "Why Do Customers Switch?" 12 (12): 177-194, 1998
2 Mazursky, David, "When Customers Switch Brands" 4 : 17-30, 1987
3 Schneider, Benjamin, "Understanding Customer Delight and Outrage" 41 (41): 35-45, 1999
4 Watson, David, "Toward a Consensual Structure of Mood" 98 : 219-235, 1985
5 Heskett, James L, "The Service Profit Chain" The Free Press 1997
6 Jones, Michael A, "Switching Barriers and Repurchase Intentions in Services" 76 : 260-, 2000
7 Rust, Roland T, "Should We Delight the Customer?" 28 (28): 86-94, 2000
8 Schlossberg, Howard, "Satisfying Customers is a Minimum: You Really Have To 'Delight Them'" 24 : 10-11, 1990
9 Finn, Adam, "Reassessing the Foundations of Customer Delight" 8 (8): 103-116, 2005
10 Nunnally, Jum C, "Psychometric Theory" McGraw Hill 1967
11 Oliver, Richard L, "Profiles of Consumer Emotions and Satisfaction in Ownership and Usage" 6 : 12-27, 1993
12 Oliver, Richard L, "Processing of the Satisfaction Response in Consumption: A Suggested Framework and Research Propositions" 2 : 1-16, 1989
13 Gross, T. Scott, "Positively Outrageous Service" Waner Books 1994
14 Bagozzi, Richard P, "On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models" 16 (16): 74-94, 1988
15 Woodruff, Robert B, "Modeling Consumer Satisfaction Processes Using Experience-Based Norms" 20 : 296-304, 1983
16 Fullerton, Gordon, "Mediating, Interactive and Non-linear Effects in Service Quality and Satisfaction with Services Research" 19 : 124-136, 2002
17 Oliver, Richard L, "Measurement and Evaluation of Satisfaction Processes in Retail Settings" 57 : 25-139, 1981
18 Maister, D, "Managing the Professional Service Firm" Free Press 1993
19 Kumar, Anand, "Exploring Alternative Antecedents of Customer Delight" 14 : 14-26, 2001
20 Plutchik, Robert, "Emotion: A Psychoevolutionary Synthesis" Harper & Row 1980
21 Lazarus, Richard S, "Emotion and Adaptation" Oxford University Press 1991
22 Westbrook, Robert. A, "Dimensionality of Consumption Emotion Patterns and Consumer Satisfaction" 18 : 84-91, 1991
23 Hicks, Jessica M, "Delighted Consumers Buy Again" 18 : 94-103, 2005
24 Paterson, Kimberly, "Delighted Clients Are Loyal Clients" 140 (140): 221-234, 1997
25 Dick, Alan S, "Customer Loyalty: Toward an Integrated Conceptual Framework" 22 (22): 99-113, 1994
26 Oliver Richard L, "Customer Delight: Foundations, Findings, and Managerial Insight" 73 : 311-336, 1997
27 Arnold, Mark J, "Customer Delight in a Retail Context: Investigating Delightful and Terrible Shopping Experience" 58 : 1132-1145, 2004
28 Pickle, Hal B, "Consumerism, Product Satisfaction/Dissatisfaction: An Empirical Investigation" 7 : 87-100, 1972
29 Schwandt, Thomas A, "Constructivist, Interpretivist Approaches to Human Inquiry in Handbook of Qualitative Research" 118-137, 1994
30 Mano, Haim, "Assessing the Dimensionality and Structure of Consumption Experience: Evaluation, Feeling, and Satisfaction" 20 : 451-466, 1993
31 Skogland, Iselin, "Are your satisfied customers loyal?" 45 (45): 221-234, 2004
32 Gerbing, David W, "An Updated Paradigm for Scale Development Incorporating Unidimensionality and Its Assessment" 25 (25): 186-192, 1998
33 Eroglu, Sevgin, "An Empirical Study of Retail Crowding: Antecedents and Consequences" 66 (66): 201-221, 1990
34 Oliver, Richard L, "A framework for the formation and Structure of Consumer Expectations: Review and Propositions" 8 : 469-499, 1987
35 Spreng, Richard A, "A Re-Examination of the Determinants of Consumer Satisfaction" 60 : 15-32, 1996
36 Churchill, Gilbert A. Jr, "A Paradigm for Developing Better Measures of Marketing Constructs" 16 (16): 64-73, 1979
37 Russell, James A, "A Circumplex Model of Affect" 39 : 1161-1178, 1980
사전지식 및 관여도가 소비자의 신념불일치에 미치는 효과
산업재 공급업체의 물류역량이 물류서비스와 신뢰를 매개로 하여 물류성과에 미치는 영향
리뷰의 수, 분포, 편중이 쾌락적 및 실용적 상품의 태도 및 구매에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구
학술지 이력
| 연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
| 2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | ![]() |
| 2019-05-10 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> Korean Marketing Association | ![]() |
| 2019-04-03 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : Korean Marketing Review -> Korean Journal of Marketing | ![]() |
| 2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | ![]() |
| 2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | ![]() |
| 2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | ![]() |
| 2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | ![]() |
| 1999-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) | ![]() |
학술지 인용정보
| 기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | 1.93 | 1.93 | 1.95 |
| KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
| 2.03 | 1.94 | 4.016 | 0.3 |