실종선고 취소의 효과 = The Effects of the Cancellation of Disappearance Adjudication

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

When adjudication of disappearance is cancelled, the inheritance which became effective due to the disappearance adjudication gets cancelled, retroactively invalidating the successor``s disposal concerning inherited property, so this could jeopardize the safety of transactions by causing lossesinadvertently to the person who purchased the inheritance in good faith. To prevent this, Korean civil code has the article 29, clause 1 and 2; and thereare diverse theories about interpretation of these provisions. So to speak, about the meaning of ``good faith`` in the provision of ``the cancellation of disappearance adjudication has no effect on any acts in good faith``, article 29, clause 1, people are asserting different opinions: all the interested parties must be in good faith; both interested parties must be in good faith in a bilateral contract; we could decide the legal relationship individually and relatively depending on the interested parties`` faith; and it could be protected when only one interested party is in good faith in anunilateral contract. However, considering that the legislative intent of the above-mentioned provision is to harmonize protection of missing people``s property rights and safety of transactions, and that the provision does not say ``the bona-fide third party cannot be opposed``, the opinion of ``both interested parties must be in good faith in a bilateral contract`` seems valid. Moreover, in the case of unilateral conduct, the above-mentioned provision could be applied if the actor is in good faith. Furthermore, since the above-mentioned provision which seems to propose and regulate financial acts would not be applicable for family acts, I think that in the case of the remarriage of the remained spouse the ex-marriage would not be resurrected but only the re-marriage could be valid regardless of good faith or bad faith of the remained spouse or the partner even when the missing person comes back alive.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김주수, "친족‧상속법" 법문사 2013

2 빅즌사, "주석민법" 한국사법행정학회 2001

3 박준서, "주석민법" 한국사법행정학회 2002

4 김주수, "주석민법" 한국사법행정학회 2002

5 백경일, "실종선고 취소의 소급효 제한과 상속회복청구에 관한 고찰—실종선고의 취소가 이미 상속되고 전득된 재산 및 그 파생이익에 미치는 영향—" 한국가족법학회 25 (25): 215-252, 2011

6 김형배, "민법학강의" 신조사 2010

7 백태승, "민법총칙(제6판)" 집현재 2014

8 김재형, "민법총칙 제8판(전면개정)" 박영사 2012

9 김상용, "민법총칙" 화산미디어 2014

10 김준호, "민법총칙" 법문사 2015

11 김학동, "민법총칙" 박영사 2013

12 김대정, "민법총칙" 도서출판 피데스 2012

13 김상용, "민법총칙" 삼영사 2013

14 명순구, "민법총칙" 법문사 2007

15 이은영, "민법총칙" 박영사 2009

16 고상용, "민법총칙" 법문사 2005

17 곽윤직, "민법주해" 박영사 2007

18 곽윤직, "민법주해" 박영사 2007

19 양창수, "민법연구" 박영사 2007

20 지원림, "민법강의" 홍문사 2007

21 송덕수, "민법강의" 박영사 2013

22 山本敬三, "民法講義Ⅰ, 總則" 有斐閣 2001

23 近江幸治, "民法講義" 成文堂 2003

24 平野裕之, "民法總則" 日本評論社 2011

25 佐久間毅, "民法の 基礎" 有斐閣 2006

26 박찬주, "失踪宣告取消의 效果에 대한 새로운 理解" 한국법학원 (99) : 66-91, 2007

27 남윤봉, "失踪宣告 取消의 效果에 대하여" 한국재산법학회 23 (23): 77-97, 2006