RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기

    Transformer-based Feature Extraction Approach for Hematopoietic Cancer Subtype Classification through Gene Expression Profile

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16951038

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Recently, with the development of computing performance, machine learning, and deep learning, research is being actively conducted to solve various problems using the technology not only in the computer field but also in many other fields. As genetic information is becoming digitized in the field of biology, many studies are being conducted on ways to use computers to solve problems associated with various diseases using the genetic information. Cancer, which is mainly caused by genetic defects in cells, is one of the most active fields, and a lot of research has already been conducted. However, most studies are focused on classifying cancer and normal or cancers of different organs. The challenge is to clinically detect cancer in cells that have the ability to differentiate from a single cell into many different types of cells. Cells with this characteristic are called multipotent cells, and a typical cancer is breast cancer. In the case of breast cancer, the genetic markers of mammary stem cells are clear and have been utilized in various treatments. In contrast, hematopoietic stem cells, which are also multipotent cells, have the ability to differentiate into a wider variety of cells and differentiate in various locations in the body, making early diagnosis and prediction clinically difficult. Nevertheless, hematologic stem cell subtypes of hematologic cancers are less studied than other cancers, and unlike breast cancer, there are no accurate genetic markers of subtype differentiation. Therefore, this dissertation proposes a feature extraction technique using transformers to solve the subtype classification problem of hematopoietic cancer and detect genetic indicators. A transformer is a large structure that utilizes an attachment technique, which is currently being actively utilized in the field of natural language processing (NLP). In NLP, a transformer consists of an encoder and a decoder. The encoder is responsible for extracting contextual meaning, and the decoder is responsible for generating context from the extracted meaning. Using this concept, this dissertation proposes a transformer-based autoencoder (TFAE), a new feature extraction algorithm using a transformer encoder combined with autoencoder, with the goal of obtaining feature information meaningful for subtype classification of hematopoietic cancer.
    The details of research contents can be summarized as follows: First, this dissertation presents a transformer-based feature extraction algorithm, TFAE, for gene expression data. TFAE is designed to extract features by using a transformer-encoder to extract important feature of the data, and then extending it to a decoder to create the original. Second, in order to compare the feature extraction of the proposed feature extraction algorithm, different algorithms used for feature extraction are applied. For this purpose, PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and NMF (Non-Negative Factorization), which are widely used statistical-based feature extraction algorithms, and AE (Autoencoder) and VAE (Variational Autoencoder), which are deep learning-based feature extraction algorithms, were applied and compared. Third, multiple classifiers were applied to real tabular genomic data to classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes. Each set of features was applied to eight multiclass classifiers for performance evaluation. Finally, applied XAI (eXplainable Artificial Intelligence) to find genes that are important for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification. For this purpose, this research applied the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) algorithm, one of the XAI techniques, to show how much the extracted genes affect the subtyping and to detect which genes are important. To achieve these research objectives, the data of five types of blood cancers were collected from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), a representative open database of genetic information, and experimental data were generated by preprocessing, and then feature extraction algorithms including the proposed TFAE were used to extract genes of the same size. In order to determine how much a particular gene contributes to the subtype classification of hematopoietic cancers, this research applied the SHAP algorithm, one of the explanatory artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, to find the top 20 genes that best classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes.
    The overall experimental results show that the feature extraction techniques for each classifier yield reasonable performance for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification but the proposed TFAE algorithm can achieve better results than other feature extraction algorithms. In particular, when TFAE was combined with LGBM to classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes, the best performance was achieved with Accuracy 0.9857, Precision 0.9753, Recall 0.9635, Specificity 0.9963, F1 score 0.9691, G-mean 0.9797, and Balanced accuracy 0.9543. Although other algorithms have lower performance, they showed sufficiently significant performance in classification, confirming that this approach is effective. Consequently, the findings of this dissertation showed that our proposed feature extraction model, namely TFAE, could more accurately classify the hematopoietic cancer subtypes, and the SHAP method could identify the genes which are significant for each subtype classification.
    This dissertation can be regarded as one of the studies that showed the research potential of feature extraction techniques for classifier algorithms by applying transformer techniques to biological data, as apply real world hematopoietic cancer data to subtype classification. In the future, plans are to further develop this research and work on feature extraction for biological data using methods with similar representations such as Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and diffusion.
    번역하기

    Recently, with the development of computing performance, machine learning, and deep learning, research is being actively conducted to solve various problems using the technology not only in the computer field but also in many other fields. As genetic ...

    Recently, with the development of computing performance, machine learning, and deep learning, research is being actively conducted to solve various problems using the technology not only in the computer field but also in many other fields. As genetic information is becoming digitized in the field of biology, many studies are being conducted on ways to use computers to solve problems associated with various diseases using the genetic information. Cancer, which is mainly caused by genetic defects in cells, is one of the most active fields, and a lot of research has already been conducted. However, most studies are focused on classifying cancer and normal or cancers of different organs. The challenge is to clinically detect cancer in cells that have the ability to differentiate from a single cell into many different types of cells. Cells with this characteristic are called multipotent cells, and a typical cancer is breast cancer. In the case of breast cancer, the genetic markers of mammary stem cells are clear and have been utilized in various treatments. In contrast, hematopoietic stem cells, which are also multipotent cells, have the ability to differentiate into a wider variety of cells and differentiate in various locations in the body, making early diagnosis and prediction clinically difficult. Nevertheless, hematologic stem cell subtypes of hematologic cancers are less studied than other cancers, and unlike breast cancer, there are no accurate genetic markers of subtype differentiation. Therefore, this dissertation proposes a feature extraction technique using transformers to solve the subtype classification problem of hematopoietic cancer and detect genetic indicators. A transformer is a large structure that utilizes an attachment technique, which is currently being actively utilized in the field of natural language processing (NLP). In NLP, a transformer consists of an encoder and a decoder. The encoder is responsible for extracting contextual meaning, and the decoder is responsible for generating context from the extracted meaning. Using this concept, this dissertation proposes a transformer-based autoencoder (TFAE), a new feature extraction algorithm using a transformer encoder combined with autoencoder, with the goal of obtaining feature information meaningful for subtype classification of hematopoietic cancer.
    The details of research contents can be summarized as follows: First, this dissertation presents a transformer-based feature extraction algorithm, TFAE, for gene expression data. TFAE is designed to extract features by using a transformer-encoder to extract important feature of the data, and then extending it to a decoder to create the original. Second, in order to compare the feature extraction of the proposed feature extraction algorithm, different algorithms used for feature extraction are applied. For this purpose, PCA (Principal Component Analysis) and NMF (Non-Negative Factorization), which are widely used statistical-based feature extraction algorithms, and AE (Autoencoder) and VAE (Variational Autoencoder), which are deep learning-based feature extraction algorithms, were applied and compared. Third, multiple classifiers were applied to real tabular genomic data to classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes. Each set of features was applied to eight multiclass classifiers for performance evaluation. Finally, applied XAI (eXplainable Artificial Intelligence) to find genes that are important for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification. For this purpose, this research applied the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) algorithm, one of the XAI techniques, to show how much the extracted genes affect the subtyping and to detect which genes are important. To achieve these research objectives, the data of five types of blood cancers were collected from TCGA (The Cancer Genome Atlas), a representative open database of genetic information, and experimental data were generated by preprocessing, and then feature extraction algorithms including the proposed TFAE were used to extract genes of the same size. In order to determine how much a particular gene contributes to the subtype classification of hematopoietic cancers, this research applied the SHAP algorithm, one of the explanatory artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, to find the top 20 genes that best classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes.
    The overall experimental results show that the feature extraction techniques for each classifier yield reasonable performance for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification but the proposed TFAE algorithm can achieve better results than other feature extraction algorithms. In particular, when TFAE was combined with LGBM to classify hematopoietic cancer subtypes, the best performance was achieved with Accuracy 0.9857, Precision 0.9753, Recall 0.9635, Specificity 0.9963, F1 score 0.9691, G-mean 0.9797, and Balanced accuracy 0.9543. Although other algorithms have lower performance, they showed sufficiently significant performance in classification, confirming that this approach is effective. Consequently, the findings of this dissertation showed that our proposed feature extraction model, namely TFAE, could more accurately classify the hematopoietic cancer subtypes, and the SHAP method could identify the genes which are significant for each subtype classification.
    This dissertation can be regarded as one of the studies that showed the research potential of feature extraction techniques for classifier algorithms by applying transformer techniques to biological data, as apply real world hematopoietic cancer data to subtype classification. In the future, plans are to further develop this research and work on feature extraction for biological data using methods with similar representations such as Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) and diffusion.

    더보기

    목차 (Table of Contents)

    • Introduction 1
    • Gene expression 3
    • Measurement of gene expression 5
    • Cancer classification research using genetic information 7
    • Research motivations 9
    • Introduction 1
    • Gene expression 3
    • Measurement of gene expression 5
    • Cancer classification research using genetic information 7
    • Research motivations 9
    • Research objectives and contributions 12
    • Organization of the dissertation 14
    • Literature Review 16
    • Gene expression quantification in RNA-seq analysis 16
    • Machine learning-based cancer classification 18
    • Deep learning-based cancer classification 20
    • Cancer subtype classification 23
    • Transformer-based cancer classification 26
    • Transformer-based Hematopoietic Cancer Subtype Feature Extraction 29
    • Framework of proposed feature extraction 29
    • Transformer-based feature extraction 32
    • Autoencoder for extracting genetic features 40
    • Variational autoencoder for extracting genetic features 43
    • Research Methods for Hematopoietic Subtype Classification 46
    • Hematopoietic cancer dataset 47
    • Deep learning-based feature extraction methods 50
    • Statistics-based feature extraction methods 59
    • Shapley additive explanations for feature importance 61
    • Classification algorithms for subtype classification 62
    • Performance measures 71
    • Experimental environments 74
    • Experimental Results and Discussion 75
    • Losses for deep learning feature extraction 75
    • Visualization for feature extraction methods 79
    • Hematopoietic cancer subtype classification results 85
    • SHAP explanations for deep learning feature extraction 110
    • Discussion 119
    • Conclusion and Future work 125
    • References 128
    • Appendix 153
    • 요약 (Korean) 196
    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1. BioCarta, Nishimura, D., 2(3), 117-120, , 2001

    2. Deep Learning, Hinton G., Bengio Y., Lecun Y., 521(7553), 436-444, , 2015

    3. Random forests, Breiman, L., 45, 5-32, , 2001

    4. The cancer genome, Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., & Futreal, P. A, 458(7239), 719-724, , 2009

    5. The war on cancer, Sporn, M. B, 347(9012), 1377-1381, , 1996

    6. ER stress and diseases, Yoshida, H., 274(3), 630-658, , 2007

    7. Cancer genome landscapes, Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz Jr, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W., 339(6127), 1546-1558, , 2013

    8. Attention is all you need, Shazeer, N., Jones, L., Polosukhin, I., Uszkoreit, J., Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Gomez, A. N., Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 5998-6008, , 2017

    9. Generative adversarial nets, Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y, 27, , 2014

    10. The roots of bioinformatics, Searls, D. B, 6(6), e1000809, , 2010

    1. BioCarta, Nishimura, D., 2(3), 117-120, , 2001

    2. Deep Learning, Hinton G., Bengio Y., Lecun Y., 521(7553), 436-444, , 2015

    3. Random forests, Breiman, L., 45, 5-32, , 2001

    4. The cancer genome, Stratton, M. R., Campbell, P. J., & Futreal, P. A, 458(7239), 719-724, , 2009

    5. The war on cancer, Sporn, M. B, 347(9012), 1377-1381, , 1996

    6. ER stress and diseases, Yoshida, H., 274(3), 630-658, , 2007

    7. Cancer genome landscapes, Vogelstein, B., Papadopoulos, N., Velculescu, V. E., Zhou, S., Diaz Jr, L. A., & Kinzler, K. W., 339(6127), 1546-1558, , 2013

    8. Attention is all you need, Shazeer, N., Jones, L., Polosukhin, I., Uszkoreit, J., Parmar, N., Vaswani, A., Gomez, A. N., Advances in neural information processing systems, 30, 5998-6008, , 2017

    9. Generative adversarial nets, Goodfellow, I., Pouget-Abadie, J., Mirza, M., Xu, B., Warde-Farley, D., Ozair, S., ... & Bengio, Y, 27, , 2014

    10. The roots of bioinformatics, Searls, D. B, 6(6), e1000809, , 2010

    11. Array programming with NumPy, Harris, C. R., Cournapeau, D., Virtanen, P., Millman, K. J., Gommers, R., Van Der Walt, S. J., Oliphant, T. E., 585(7825), 357-362, , 2020

    12. Primer to the immune response, Hsieh, F. H., 113(3), 333, , 2014

    13. Stochastic neighbor embedding, Hinton, G. E., & Roweis, S., 15, , 2002

    14. The origins of bioinformatics, Hagen, J. B, 1(3), 231- 236, , 2000

    15. Lessons from the cancer genome, Lander, E. S., Garraway, L. A., Cell, 153(1), 17-37, , 2013

    16. Immunophilins and HIV-1 infection, Minder, D., Böni, J., Schüpbach, J., & Gehring, H., 147, 1531-1542, , 2002

    17. Classification and regression trees, Breiman, L., Friedman, J. H., Olshen, R. A., & Stone, C. J, ISBN-13, 978-0412048418., , 1984

    18. Sec61 in antigen cross-presentation, Zehner, M., & Burgdorf, S., 6(24), 19954, , 2015

    19. The genetics of cancer—a 3D model, Cole, K. A., Krizman, D. B., & Emmert–Buck, M. R., 21(1), 38-41, , 1999

    20. K-nearest neighbor for uncertain data, Agrawal, R., 105(11), 13-16, , 2014

    21. Language models are few-shot learners, Subbiah, M., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Amodei, D., Kaplan, J. D., Brown, T., Dhariwal, P., 33, 1877-1901, , 2020

    22. Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment, Hunter, J. D., 9(03), 90-95, , 2007

    23. PID: the pathway interaction database, Schaefer, C. F., Anthony, K., Krupa, S., Buchoff, J., Day, M., Hannay, T., & Buetow, K. H., 37(Suppl_1), D674-D679, , 2009

    24. Seabornstatistical data visualization, Waskom ML, 6(60), 3021, , 2021

    25. The support vector machine under test, Meyer, D., Leisch, F., & Hornik, K., 55(1-2), 169-186, , 2003

    26. Niche heterogeneity in the bone marrow, Birbrair, A., & Frenette, P. S., 1370(1), 82-96, , 2016

    27. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models, Abbeel, P., Ho, J., Jain, A., Advances in neural information processing systems, 33, 6840-6851, , 2020

    28. Hallmarks of cancer: The next generation, Hanahan, D., Weinberg, R. A., 144(5), 646-674., , 2011

    29. Pattern recognition and machine learning, Bishop, C. M., & Nasrabadi, N. M., Vol. 4, No. 4, p. 738, , 2006

    30. Scikit-learn: Machine learning in Python, Pedregosa, F., Varoquaux, G., Gramfort, A., Michel, V., Thirion, B., Grisel, O., ... & Duchesnay, É, 12, 2825-2830, , 2011

    31. Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system, Chen, T., & Guestrin, C., 785-794, , 2016

    32. Transformer-based dimensionality reduction, Gao, T., Ran, R., Fang, B., arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.08288, , 2022

    33. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours, Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., Van De Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., ... & Botstein, D., 406(6797), 747-752, , 2000

    34. MicroRNAs in diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma, Zou, L., Tong, R., Song, G., Cho, W. C., Ni, H., 11(2), 1271-1280, , 2016

    35. Classification and regression by randomForest, Liaw, A., & Wiener, M., 2(3), 18-22, , 2002

    36. KEGG: Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, Goto S, Kanehisa M, 28(1), 27-30, , 2000

    37. The molecular hallmarks of epigenetic control, Jenuwein, T., Allis, C. D., 17(8), 487-500, , 2016

    38. Toward a shared vision for cancer genomic data, Ferretti, V., Varmus, H. E., Grossman, R. L., Staudt, L. M., Kibbe, W. A., Heath, A. P., Lowy, D. R., 375(12), 1109-1112, , 2016

    39. A framework for feature selection in clustering, Witten D. M., Tibshirani R., 105, 713–726, , 2010

    40. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization, Lee, D., & Seung, H. S., 13, , 2000

    41. Tabnet: Attentive interpretable tabular learning, Pfister, T., Arik, S. Ö ., arXiv. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.13912, , 2019

    42. RNA-Seq: a revolutionary tool for transcriptomics, Wang, Z., Gerstein, M., & Snyder, M., 10(1), 57-63., , 2009

    43. Classifier technology and the illusion of progress, Hand, D. J, 1-15, , 2006

    44. Sequence to sequence learning with neural networks, Le, Q. V., Sutskever, I., Vinyals, O., 27, , 2014

    45. Data structures for statistical computing in python, McKinney, W., 445(1), 51-56, , 2010

    46. PPIB mutations cause severe osteogenesis imperfecta, van Dijk, F. S., Nesbitt, I. M., Zwikstra, E. H., Nikkels, P. G., Piersma, S. R., Fratantoni, S. A., ... & Pals, G., 85(4), 521-527, , 2009

    47. Principal component analysis of multivariate images, Geladi, P., Isaksson, H., Lindqvist, L., Wold, S., & Esbensen, K., 5(3), 209-220, , 1989

    48. A microRNA polycistron as a potential human oncogene, He, L., Thomson, J. M., Hemann, M. T., Hernando-Monge, E., Mu, D., Goodson, S., ... & Hammond, S. M., 435(7043), 828-833, , 2005

    49. A survey of best practices for RNA-seq data analysis, Tarazona, S., McPherson, A., Gomez-Cabrero, D., Conesa, A., Cervera, A., Mortazavi, A, Madrigal, P., 17(1), 1-19, , 2016

    50. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, Lee S-I, Lundberg SM, Advances in neural information processing systems 30, , 2017

    51. Chaos embedded particle swarm optimization algorithms, Alatas, B., Akin, E., & Ozer, A. B, 40(4), 1715-1734, , 2009

    52. Emerging targeted agents in metastatic breast cancer., Zardavas, D., Baselga, J., & Piccart, M., 10(4), 191-210., , 2013

    53. Introduction to machine learning: k-nearest neighbors, Zhang, Z, 4(11), 218-224, , 2016

    54. Krill herd: a new bio-inspired optimization algorithm, Gandomi, A. H., & Alavi, A. H., 17(12), 4831-4845, , 2012

    55. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects, Mitchell, T. M., Jordan, M. I., Science 349(6245), 255-260, , 2015

    56. The genetics of Alzheimer disease: back to the future, Bertram, L., Lill, C. M., & Tanzi, R. E., 68(2), 270-281, , 2010

    57. On layer normalization in the transformer architecture, Liu, T., Yang, Y., Xiong, R., He, D., Zheng, K., Xing, C., Zheng, S., In International Conference on Machine Learning, Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, 119(1), 10524- 10533, , 2020

    58. Reducing the dimensionality of data with neural networks, Hinton, G. E., Salakhutdinov, R. R., 313(5786), 504-507, , 2006

    59. The lasso method for variable selection in the Cox model, Tibshirani R., 16(4), 385-395, , 1997

    60. Hematopoiesis: an evolving paradigm for stem cell biology, Orkin, S. H., & Zon, L. I, 132(4), 631-644, , 2008

    61. MicroRNA-372 acts as a double-edged sword in human cancers, Alian, F.,, Alizadeh-Fanalou, S., Tajik, F.,, Yousefi, K.,, Mohammadi, F., Azadfallah, A.,, Hosseini, A.,, 9(5), e15991, , 2023

    62. Normalizing flows for probabilistic modeling and inference, Lakshminarayanan, B., Nalisnick, E., Mohamed, S., Papamakarios, G., Rezende, D. J., 22(1), 2617-2680, , 2021

    63. The Human Genome Project: lessons from large-scale biology, Collins, F. S., Morgan, M., & Patrinos, A, 300(5617), 286-290., , 2003

    64. Exploring the genomes of cancer cells: progress and promise, Stratton, M. R., 331(6024), 1553-1558, , 2011

    65. Gene selection using pyramid gravitational search algorithm, Tahmouresi, A., Rezaei, M., Rashedi, E., Yaghoobi, M. M., 17(3), e0265351, , 2022

    66. Mapping and quantifying mammalian transcriptomes by RNA-Seq, Mortazavi, A., Williams, B. A., McCue, K., Schaeffer, L., & Wold, B, 5(7), 621-628, , 2008

    67. Transcriptional regulation and its misregulation in disease, Lee, T. I., & Young, R. A, 152(6), 1237-1251, , 2013

    68. Implications of the Human Genome Project for medical science, Collins, F. S., McKusick, V. A., Jama, 285(5), 540-544, , 2001

    69. Lightgbm: A highly efficient gradient boosting decision tree, Ke, G., Meng, Q., Finley, T., Wang, T., Chen, W., Ma, W., ... & Liu, T. Y, 30, , 2017

    70. Nonsmall- cell lung cancers: a heterogeneous set of diseases, Hammerman, P. S., Wong, K. K., Chen, Z., Fillmore, C. M., Kim, C. F., 14(8), 535–546, , 2014

    71. Towards a rigorous science of interpretable machine learning, Doshi-Velez, F., Kim, B., arXiv preprint arXiv:1702.08608, , 2017

    72. Overview of human B-cell development and antibody deficiencies, Nandiwada, S. L., 519, 113485, , 2023

    73. Emerging landscape of oncogenic signatures across human cancers, Ciriello, G., Miller, M. L., Aksoy, B. A., Senbabaoglu, Y., Schultz, N., & Sander, C., 45(10), 1127–1133, , 2013

    74. B-cell malignancies in microRNA Eμ-miR-17∼ 92 transgenic mice, Sandhu, S. K., Fassan, M., Volinia, S., Lovat, F., Balatti, V., Pekarsky, Y., & Croce, C. M., 110(45), 18208-18213, , 2013

    75. Machine learning applications in cancer prognosis and prediction, Kourou, K., Exarchos, T. P., Exarchos, K. P., Karamouzis, M. V., & Fotiadis, D. I, 13, 8-17, , 2015

    76. Genetics of autoimmune diseases: insights from population genetics, Ramos, P. S., Shedlock, A. M., & Langefeld, C. D., 60(11), 657-664, , 2015

    77. Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods, Ziegler, A., König, I. R., Kruppa, J., 131(10), 1639-1654, , 2012

    78. Multiple primary cancers associated with hematological malignancies, Nagura, E. I., Kawashima, K., & Yamada, K., 15, 211-222., , 1985

    79. Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes, Croft, D., O’kelly, G., Wu, G., Haw, R., Gillespie, M., Matthews, L., ... & Stein, L., 39(Suppl_1), D691-D697, , 2010

    80. Skin cancer classification using deep learning and transfer learning, Foaud, M. M., Kassem, M. A., Hosny, K. M., In 2018 9th Cairo international biomedical engineering conference (CIBEC) (pp. 90-93). IEEE, , 2018

    81. Why should i trust you? explaining the predictions of any classifier, Guestrin, C., Singh, S., Ribeiro, M. T., arXiv preprint arXiv:1602.04938, , 2016

    82. DeepGx: deep learning using gene expression for cancer classification, de Guia, J. M., Devaraj, M., Leung, C. K., pp. 913-920, , 2019

    83. Neural machine translation by jo intly learning to align and translate, Cho, K., Bengio, Y., Bahdanau, D., arXiv preprint arXiv:1409.0473, , 2014

    84. More Is Better: Recent Progress in Multi-Omics Data Integration Methods, Huang, S., Chaudhary, K., & Garmire, L. X, 8, 84, , 2017

    85. What do we need to build explainable AI systems for the medical domain?, Kell, D. B., Holzinger, A., Pattichis, C. S., Biemann, C., arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.09923, , 2017

    86. Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks, Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Thrun, S., Esteva, A., Blau, H. M., Novoa, R. A., Kuprel, B., 542(7639), 115–118, , 2017

    87. Feature subset selection using improved binary gravitational search algorithm, Rashedi, E., Nezamabadi-Pour, H., 26(3), 1211-1221, , 2014

    88. The changing landscape of predictive biomarkers in the era of machine learning, Perry, B., Herskovitz, M., Chen, R., Rimm, D. L., 65(6), 723-726, , 2019

    89. XGBoost-based framework for smoking-induced noncommunicable disease prediction, Davagdorj, K., Ryu, K. H., Pham, V. H., Theera-Umpon, N., 17(18), 6513, , 2020

    90. Kif18B interacts with EB1 and controls astral microtubule length during mitosis, Stout, J. R., Yount, A. L., Powers, J. A., LeBlanc, C., Ems-McClung, S. C., & Walczak, C. E., 22(17), 3070-3080, , 2011

    91. Transformer-based deep learning integrates multi-omic data with cancer pathways, Cai, Z., Aref, A., Zhong, Q., Reddel, R. R., Robinson, P. J., Poulos, R. C., bioRxiv, 2022-10, , 2022

    92. Machine learning for medical diagnosis: History, state of the art and perspective, Kononenko, I., 23(1), 89-109, , 2001

    93. ADP-ribosylation of RNA in mammalian cells is mediated by TRPT1 and multiple PARPs, Zaja, R., Weixler, L., Feijs, K. L., 50(16), 9426-9441, , 2022

    94. Explaining prediction models and individual predictions with feature contributions, Štrumbelj, E., Kononenko, I., 41, 647-665, , 2014

    95. Introduction to pytorch. Deep learning with python Auto-encoding variational bayes, Ketkar, N. Welling, M., D. P. arXiv preprint arXiv:1312.6114, , 2017

    96. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-Seq data, Robinson MD, Oshlack A, 11(3), 1-9, , 2010

    97. mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration, Rohart, F., Gautier, B., Singh, A., & Lê Cao, K. A, 13(11), e1005752, , 2017

    98. A data parallel approach to genetic programming using programmable graphics hardware, Chitty, D. M., pp. 1566-1573, , 2007

    99. Dissecting the multicellular ecosystem of metastatic melanoma by single-cell RNA-seq, Tirosh, I., Izar, B., Prakadan, S. M., Wadsworth, M. H., Treacy, D., Trombetta, J. J., ... & Garraway, L. A, 352(6282), 189-196., , 2016

    100. Mutational Analysis and Deep Learning Classification of Uterine and Cervical Cancers, Gomez, P., 2022-10, , 2022

    101. Molecular subtyping of cancer: current status and moving toward clinical applications, Zhao, L., Lee, V. H., Ng, M. K., Yan, H., & Bijlsma, M. F., 20(2), 572-584, , 2019

    102. Role of kif2c, A gene related to ALL relapse, in embryonic hematopoiesis in zebrafish, Kim, Y. H., Ha, M., Oh, C. K., Kang, J., Myung, K., Kang, J. W., Lee, Y., 21(9), 3127, , 2020

    103. Distinct types of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma identified by gene expression profiling, Alizadeh, A. A., Rosenwald, A., Lossos, I. S., Davis, R. E., Eisen, M. B., Sabet, H., Ma, C., 403(6769), 503-511, , 2000

    104. Quantitative monitoring of gene expression patterns with a complementary DNA microarray, Davis, R. W., Brown, P. O., Shalon, D., Schena, M., Science, 270(5235), 467-470, , 1995

    105. The multifaceted role and utility of microRNAs in indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, Karousi, P., Artemaki, P. I., Papageorgiou, S. G., Letsos, P. A., Zoupa, I. C., Kontos, C. K., Katsaraki, K., 9, , 2021

    106. Deep learning techniques for cancer classification using microarray gene expression data, Sharma, A., Gupta, S., Shabaz, M., Gupta, M. K., Frontiers in Physiology, 13, 952709, , 2022

    107. Deep learning–based multi-omics integration robustly predicts survival in liver cancer, Poirion, O. B., Garmire, L. X., Lu, L., Chaudhary, K., 24(6), 1248-1259, , 2018

    108. Small molecule targets TMED9 and promotes lysosomal degradation to reverse proteinopathy, Dvela-Levitt, M., Kost-Alimova, M., Emani, M., Kohnert, E., Thompson, R., Sidhom, E. H., ... & Greka, A, 178(3), 521-535, , 2019

    109. Deep learning feature extraction approach for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification, Batbaatar, E., Piao, Y., Theera-Umpon, N., Ryu, K. H., Park, K. H., 18(4), 2197, , 2021

    110. Deep-learning approach to identifying cancer subtypes using high-dimensional genomic data, Goodison, S., Yang, L., Sun, Y., Chen, R., 36(5), 1476-1483, , 2020

    111. DeepCC: a novel deep learning-based framework for cancer molecular subtype classification, Gao, F., Wang, W., Tan, M., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y., Fessler, E., ... & Wang, X, 8(9), 44, , 2019

    112. How to read articles that use machine learning: users’ guides to the medical literature, Peng, L., Liu, Y., Chen, P. H. C., Krause, J., Jama, 322(18), 1806-1816, , 2019

    113. Prediction of cardiovascular risk factors from retinal fundus photographs via deep learning, Blumer, K., Poplin, R., Liu, Y., Webster, D. R., Corrado, G. S., McConnell, M. V., Varadarajan, A. V., 2(3), 158-164, , 2018

    114. Measurement of mRNA abundance using RNA-seq data: RPKM measure is inconsistent among samples, Lynch, V. J., Wagner, G. P., Kin, K., 131, 281-285, , 2012

    115. Variational Autoencoder-Based Deep Neural Network for Coronary Heart Disease Risk Prediction, Park, K. H., Theera-Umpon, N., Davagdorj, K., Ryu, K. H., Amarbayasgalan, T., In Advances in Intelligent Information Hiding and Multimedia Signal Processing: Proceeding of the IIH-MSP 2021 & FITAT 2021, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, Volume 1 (pp. 1-8). Singapore: Springer Nature Singapore., , 2022

    116. A single-sample microarray normalization method to facilitate personalized-medicine workflows, Piccolo, S. R., Sun, Y., Campbell, J. D., Lenburg, M. E., Bild, A. H., & Johnson, W. E., 100(6), 337-344, , 2012

    117. Fast multi-class image annotation with random subwindows and multiple output randomized trees, Dumont, M., Marée, R., Wehenkel, L., & Geurts, P., In International Conference on Computer Vision Theory and Applications (VISAPP), , 2009

    118. Logistic regression and artificial neural network classification models: a methodology review, Dreiseitl, S., Ohno-Machado, L., 35(5-6), 352-359, , 2002

    119. A review of evidence of health benefit from artificial neural networks in medical intervention, Lisboa, P. J., 15(1), 11-39, , 2002

    120. Human HRD1 protects against ER stress‐induced apoptosis through ER‐associated degradation1, Kaneko, M., Nomura, Y., Uesugi, M., Ishiguro, M., Niinuma, Y., 532(1-2), 147-152, , 2002

    121. Cancer Detection based on Microarray Data Classification Using FLNN and Hybrid Feature Selection, Afif, G. G., Astuti, W., Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi), 5(4), 794-801, , 2021

    122. Pathformer: biological pathway informed Transformer model integrating multi-modal data of cancer, Liu, X., Tao, Y., Cai, Z., Bao, P., Ma, H., Li, K., ... & Lu, Z. J, 2023-05, , 2023

    123. Comprehensive evaluation of differential methylation analysis methods for bisulfite sequencing data, Xiang, R., Piao, Y., Park, K. H., Xu, W., Ryu, K. H., 18(15), 7975, , 2021

    124. A comprehensive genomic pan-cancer classification using The Cancer Genome Atlas gene expression data, Li, Y., Lee, K., Krahn, J. M., Li, L., Kang, K., Umbach, D. M., Croutwater, N., 18, 1-13, , 2017

    125. A machine learning approach for the classification of kidney cancer subtypes using miRNA genome data, Muhamed Ali, A., Ibrahim, A., Zhuang, H., Huang, M., Wu, A., Rehman, O., 8(12), 2422, , 2018

    126. Deep learning approach for cancer subtype classification using high-dimensional gene expression data, Luo, H., Shen, J., Shi, J., Luo, J., Zhai, H., Liu, X., Wu, Z., ..., 23(1), 1-17, , 2022

    127. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications, Sørlie, T., Perou, C. M., Tibshirani, R., Aas, T., Geisler, S., Johnsen, H., ... & Børresen- Dale, A. L., 98(19), 10869-10874, , 2001

    128. Feature selection for breast cancer classification by integrating somatic mutation and gene expression, Jiang, Q., Jin, M., 12, 629946, , 2021

    129. Molecular classification of cancer: class discovery and class prediction by gene expression monitoring, Golub, T. R., Slonim, D. K., Tamayo, P., Huard, C., Gaasenbeek, M., Mesirov, J. P., ... & Lander, E. S., 286(5439), 531-537, , 1999

    130. Cytoplasmic destruction of p53 by the endoplasmic reticulum‐resident ubiquitin ligase ‘Synoviolin’, Yamasaki, S., Yagishita, N., Sasaki, T., Nakazawa, M., Kato, Y., Yamadera, T., ... & Nakajima, T., 26(1), 113- 122, , 2007

    131. Extracting a biologically relevant latent space from cancer transcriptomes with variational autoencoders, Greene, C. S., Way, G. P.,, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing 23, 80, , 2017

    132. Multiclass cancer classification using a feature subset-based ensemble from microRNA expression profiles, Ryu, K. H., Piao, M., Piao, Y., 80, 39-44, , 2017

    133. Automatic melanoma detection via multi-scale lesion-biased representation and joint reverse classification, Kim, J., Feng, D., Bi, L., Fulham, M., Ahn, E., 2016 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI). doi:10.1109/isbi.2016.7493447, , 2016

    134. Comparing the normalization methods for the differential analysis of Illumina high-throughput RNA-Seq data, Li, P., Piao, Y., Shon, H. S., & Ryu, K. H., 16(1), 1-9, , 2015

    135. Graph embedding ensemble methods based on the heterogeneous network for lncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction, Zhou, S., Zhao, C., Zhang, W., Niu, Y., Qiu, Y., Liu, S., BMC genomics, 21, 1-12, , 2020

    136. A practical tutorial on autoencoders for nonlinear feature fusion: Taxonomy, models, software and guidelines, Charte, F., García, S., Charte, D., del Jesus, M. J., Herrera, F., 44, 78-96, , 2018

    137. INVITED REVIEW Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR): trends and problems, Bustin, S. A, 29, 23-39, , 2002

    138. A complex of Kif18b and MCAK promotes microtubule depolymerization and is negatively regulated by Aurora kinases, Tanenbaum, M. E., Macurek, L., van der Vaart, B., Galli, M., Akhmanova, A., & Medema, R. H., 21(16), 1356-1365, , 2011

    139. Characterization of PPIB interaction in the P3H1 ternary complex and implications for its pathological mutations, Shu, Z., Feng, L., Xia, L., Zhang, J., Wu, J., Zhou, A., Zhang, W., 76, 3899-3914, , 2019

    140. Experimental and computational modeling for signature and biomarker discovery of renal cell carcinoma progression, Souleyreau, W., Emanuelli, A., Rudewicz, J., Bikfalvi, A., Alvarez-Arenas, A., Clarke, K., Cooley, L. S., 20(1), 1-21, , 2021

    141. The Sel1LHrd1 endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation complex manages a key checkpoint in B cell development, Ji, Y., Kim, H., Yang, L., Sha, H., Roman, C. A., Long, Q., & Qi, L., 16(10), 2630-2640, , 2016

    142. Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, taxonomies, opportunities and challenges toward responsible AI, Arrieta, A. B., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado, A., Díaz-Rodríguez, N., Del Ser, J., Herrera, F., Information Fusion, 58, 82-115, , 2020

    143. Cloning, functional characterization, and mechanism of action of the B-cell-specific transcriptional coactivator OCA-B, Luo, Y., & Roeder, R. G., 15(8), 4115-4124, , 1995

    144. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, Jemal A, Ferlay J, Torre LA, Soerjomataram I, Bray F, Siegel RL, 68(6), 394-424, , 2018

    145. PathCNN: interpretable convolutional neural networks for survival prediction and pathway analysis applied to glioblastoma, Choi, W., Kang, M., Ko, E., Tannenbaum, A., Oh, J. H., Deasy, J. O., 37(Suppl_1), i443-i450, , 2021

    146. Feature selection for microarray data classification using hybrid information gain and a modified binary krill herd algorithm, Zhang, G., Wang, J., Luo, J., Yan, C., Hou, J., Interdisciplinary Sciences: Computational Life Sciences, 12, 288-301, , 2020

    147. Correlation of microarraybased breast cancer molecular subtypes and clinical outcomes: implications for treatment optimization, Kao, K. J., Chang, K. M., Hsu, H. C., & Huang, A. T., 11(1), 1-15., , 2011

    148. LncRNA-miRNA interaction prediction through sequence-derived linear neighborhood propagation method with information combination, Zhang, W., Niu, Y, Tang, G., Zhou, S., 20(11), 1-12, , 2019

    149. Method for detection of specific RNAs in agarose gels by transfer to diazobenzyloxymethyl-paper and hybridization with DNA probes, Alwine, J. C., Kemp, D. J., & Stark, G. R., 74(12), 5350- 5354, , 1977

    150. MOGONET integrates multi-omics data using graph convolutional networks allowing patient classification and biomarker identification, Shao, W., Zhang, J., Tang, H., Huang, K., Wang, T., Ding, Z., Huang, Z., 12(1), 3445, , 2021

    151. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation, Trapnell, C., Williams, B. A., Pertea, G., Mortazavi, A., Kwan, G., Van Baren, M. J., ... & Pachter, L., 28(5), 511-515, , 2010

    152. GSEA–SDBE: A gene selection method for breast cancer classification based on GSEA and analyzing differences in performance metrics, Ai, H., 17(4), e0263171, , 2022

    153. Hematopoietic stem cells but not multipotent progenitors drive erythropoiesis during chronic erythroid stress in EPO transgenic mice, Ramasz, B., Franke, K., Grinenko, T., Singh, R. P., Lesche, M., Dahl, A., Wielockx, B., 10(6), 1908-1919., , 2018

    154. International Consensus Classification of Myeloid Neoplasms and Acute Leukemias: integrating morphologic, clinical, and genomic data, Arber, D. A., Calvo, K. R., Kvasnicka, H. M., Borowitz, M. J., Orazi, A., Hasserjian, R. P., Tefferi, A., Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 140(11), 1200-1228., , 2022

    155. Multivariable prognostic models: issues in developing models, evaluating assumptions and adequacy, and measuring and reducing errors, Harrell Jr, F. E., Lee, K. L., & Mark, D. B, 15(4), 361-387, , 1996

    156. Overexpression of MHC class I heavy chain protein in young skeletal muscle leads to severe myositis: implications for juvenile myositis, Nagaraju, K., ... &, Wedderburn, L. R., Shah, S.,, Li, C. K. C., Knopp, P., Moncrieffe, H., Singh, B.,, 175(3), 1030-1040., , 2009

    157. OBF-1, a novel B cell-specific coactivator that stimulates immunoglobulin promoter activity through association with octamer-binding proteins, Strubin, M., Newell, J. W., & Matthias, P., 80(3), 497-506., , 1995

    158. DNMT2/TRDMT1 gene knockout compromises doxorubicin-induced unfolded protein response and sensitizes cancer cells to ER stress-induced apoptosis, Adamczyk-Grochala, J., Bloniarz, D., Zielinska, K., Lewinska, A., & Wnuk, M., 28(1-2), 166-185., , 2023

    159. Integrative clustering of multiple genomic data types using a joint latent variable model with application to breast and lung cancer subtype analysis, Shen, R., Olshen, A. B., & Ladanyi, M., 25(22), 2906-2912, , 2009

    160. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the prognostic value of radiomics based models in non-small cell lung cancer treated with curative radiotherapy, Korte, J., Lehrer, E. J., Lazarakis, S., Kothari, G., Siva, S., Kron, T., Zaorsky, N. G., 155, , 2021

    161. On splitting training and validation set: a comparative study of cross-validation, bootstrap and systematic sampling for estimating the generalization performance of supervised learning, Goodacre, R., Xu, Y., 2(3), 249-262, , 2018

    162. Implementasi Minimum Redudancy Maksimum Relevance (mrmr) Dan Genetic Algorithm (ga) Untuk Reduksi Dimensi Pada Klasifikasi Data Microarray Menggunakan Functional Link Neural Network (flnn), Pradana, B., Adiwijaya, A., & Adistania, A, 6(2), 8966-8977., , 2019

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼