RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      바람직한 환경윤리의 정립을 위한 시론 = For the establishment of desirable envirnmental ethics

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A2080021

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper deals with the establishment of desirable environmental ethics.For desirable envirnmental ethics, we have to emphasize the following points. (1) The existence of homeostasis or stability in nature is the general norm at which the ecologist drives. The value of homeostasis or stabilitythe demand that systems of resource use be compatible with the ecosystems of nature-have to becomes one of the envirmental norms. (2) We must expand our ethical attitudes to nonhuman creatures. It would include an expanded concept of the value that goes well beyond anthropocentrism and an expanded concept of the value of life. (3) A rational anthropocentrism is a radical improvement over the traditional unsophi sticated type. Rational anthropocentrism recognizes the inherent value of nonhuman forms of life but sees it as secondary to the development of human values. The ecological anthropocentrism is adequate to resolve envirnmental problems. (4) Principles and ideas central to traditional moral philosophy-for example, utility and rights-can play a role in developing envirnmental ethics. Desirable envirnmental ethics may require some metaphysical theory, some theory about nature and the place of humans, animals and plants within nature. Such a theory may be required to resolve the extension of the concepts of value, obligation, utility, and rights. The expansion of that concepts must be used as grounds of justification for new legal frameworks for the resolution of envirnmental questions. (5)These various points of emphasis would provide a complex ethical base concerning the decision to use resources in one way or another. In the process of putting these norms for envirnmental use into effect, we would have to apply them contextualy and in ways in which conflicts among values, obligations, and rights might be clarified and value priorities displayed.
      번역하기

      This paper deals with the establishment of desirable environmental ethics.For desirable envirnmental ethics, we have to emphasize the following points. (1) The existence of homeostasis or stability in nature is the general norm at which the ecologist ...

      This paper deals with the establishment of desirable environmental ethics.For desirable envirnmental ethics, we have to emphasize the following points. (1) The existence of homeostasis or stability in nature is the general norm at which the ecologist drives. The value of homeostasis or stabilitythe demand that systems of resource use be compatible with the ecosystems of nature-have to becomes one of the envirmental norms. (2) We must expand our ethical attitudes to nonhuman creatures. It would include an expanded concept of the value that goes well beyond anthropocentrism and an expanded concept of the value of life. (3) A rational anthropocentrism is a radical improvement over the traditional unsophi sticated type. Rational anthropocentrism recognizes the inherent value of nonhuman forms of life but sees it as secondary to the development of human values. The ecological anthropocentrism is adequate to resolve envirnmental problems. (4) Principles and ideas central to traditional moral philosophy-for example, utility and rights-can play a role in developing envirnmental ethics. Desirable envirnmental ethics may require some metaphysical theory, some theory about nature and the place of humans, animals and plants within nature. Such a theory may be required to resolve the extension of the concepts of value, obligation, utility, and rights. The expansion of that concepts must be used as grounds of justification for new legal frameworks for the resolution of envirnmental questions. (5)These various points of emphasis would provide a complex ethical base concerning the decision to use resources in one way or another. In the process of putting these norms for envirnmental use into effect, we would have to apply them contextualy and in ways in which conflicts among values, obligations, and rights might be clarified and value priorities displayed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 들어가는말
      • Ⅱ. 몸말
      • (1) 환경 파괴의 책임 문제와 자연에 대한 전통적 해석
      • (2) 환경에 대한 새로운 윤리적 태도
      • ① 생태학과 윤리학
      • Ⅰ. 들어가는말
      • Ⅱ. 몸말
      • (1) 환경 파괴의 책임 문제와 자연에 대한 전통적 해석
      • (2) 환경에 대한 새로운 윤리적 태도
      • ① 생태학과 윤리학
      • ② 인간중심주의적인 세계관의 극복:새로운 형이상학의 모색
      • ③ 극단적인 생물학적 평등주의의 배제
      • ④ 합리적 인간중심주의
      • ⑤ 응용 1: 여타 생물들에 대한 고려
      • ⑥ 응용 2: 생태학과 경제적 권리
      • Ⅲ. 맺는 말
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼