RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    디지털시대 공영방송의 채널운용 전략에 관한 연구 = Public Broadcaster's Channel Strategies for a Digital Age

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104612377

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This paper aims to discuss public broadcaster’s channel operations as a strategic
    option to maintain the position of public broadcasting in a digital age, while it
    regards public broadcasting as an eligible alternative to curb the slanting
    commercialization of broadcasting. Channel strategies are very important in that
    channel is not merely a contact point to share use value by the interaction with
    audience, but also a window of exchange value to provide consumer with packed
    broadcasting contents. Especially to enhance brand value of public broadcasting,
    an unstable organization in an multi-channels environment, it is very important
    that public broadcasting manage various channels effectively. This thesis
    suggested 4 models that KBS seek after as a framework of channel strategies.
    Firstly, it is <universality-innovations> model. This makes people access easily and
    recognize the picture of world comprehensively, while it provides creative and
    innovative ideas to get over social contradictions. Secondly, it is <universalityprofitability>
    model. This makes people access easily and enjoy programs.
    Thirdly, it is <specialty-innovations> model. The ongoing KBS channels do not
    suit this model. However, it is necessary that KBS secures special and innovative
    channels to extend its public service and check commercial infiltration into new
    media. Fourthly, it is <specialty-profitability> model. This implies that provided
    are the specialized programs suitable to segmented audience. It is desirable that
    KBS should focus on both <universality-profitability> model and <specialtyinnovations>
    model in the future. While KBS tries to get rid of possible
    misunderstanding around the identity of KBS through overall amendment and
    supplement of KBS-2, it should explore innovative services suitable to public
    broadcasting from new media such as satellite
    번역하기

    This paper aims to discuss public broadcaster’s channel operations as a strategic option to maintain the position of public broadcasting in a digital age, while it regards public broadcasting as an eligible alternative to curb the slanting commercia...

    This paper aims to discuss public broadcaster’s channel operations as a strategic
    option to maintain the position of public broadcasting in a digital age, while it
    regards public broadcasting as an eligible alternative to curb the slanting
    commercialization of broadcasting. Channel strategies are very important in that
    channel is not merely a contact point to share use value by the interaction with
    audience, but also a window of exchange value to provide consumer with packed
    broadcasting contents. Especially to enhance brand value of public broadcasting,
    an unstable organization in an multi-channels environment, it is very important
    that public broadcasting manage various channels effectively. This thesis
    suggested 4 models that KBS seek after as a framework of channel strategies.
    Firstly, it is <universality-innovations> model. This makes people access easily and
    recognize the picture of world comprehensively, while it provides creative and
    innovative ideas to get over social contradictions. Secondly, it is <universalityprofitability>
    model. This makes people access easily and enjoy programs.
    Thirdly, it is <specialty-innovations> model. The ongoing KBS channels do not
    suit this model. However, it is necessary that KBS secures special and innovative
    channels to extend its public service and check commercial infiltration into new
    media. Fourthly, it is <specialty-profitability> model. This implies that provided
    are the specialized programs suitable to segmented audience. It is desirable that
    KBS should focus on both <universality-profitability> model and <specialtyinnovations>
    model in the future. While KBS tries to get rid of possible
    misunderstanding around the identity of KBS through overall amendment and
    supplement of KBS-2, it should explore innovative services suitable to public
    broadcasting from new media such as satellite

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "지상파 방송 독과점논쟁에서 공익성 의미에 대한 고찰." 2004.7.

    2 "이원적 경쟁체제 하의 방송집중" 77-104, 2000

    3 "방송환경 변화에 따른 공영방송 프로그램의 역할과 개선방안." 98 : 11-, 1998

    4 "방송의 공영성과 KBS 규제제도." 2002

    5 "방송동향과 분석" (204) : 2004

    6 "방송 통신 융합에 따른 시장, 산업의 변화." 87-113., 2004

    7 "매체의사유화-개방화에 대한 연구: 아일랜드 사례분석." 14 : 305-330., 2002

    8 "매체간균형발전 방안 모색." 민주언론운동시민연합 주최. 2004.8.

    9 "대중매체 이론과 사상" 개마고원 2001

    10 "다채널 시대의 상업적인 공익 프로그램 공급 가능성에 대한 연구." 45 (45): 5-34, 2001

    1 "지상파 방송 독과점논쟁에서 공익성 의미에 대한 고찰." 2004.7.

    2 "이원적 경쟁체제 하의 방송집중" 77-104, 2000

    3 "방송환경 변화에 따른 공영방송 프로그램의 역할과 개선방안." 98 : 11-, 1998

    4 "방송의 공영성과 KBS 규제제도." 2002

    5 "방송동향과 분석" (204) : 2004

    6 "방송 통신 융합에 따른 시장, 산업의 변화." 87-113., 2004

    7 "매체의사유화-개방화에 대한 연구: 아일랜드 사례분석." 14 : 305-330., 2002

    8 "매체간균형발전 방안 모색." 민주언론운동시민연합 주최. 2004.8.

    9 "대중매체 이론과 사상" 개마고원 2001

    10 "다채널 시대의 상업적인 공익 프로그램 공급 가능성에 대한 연구." 45 (45): 5-34, 2001

    11 "다채널 상황하의 수용자 복지와 보편적 방송영상서비스." 44 (44): 287-327, 1999

    12 "국제커뮤니케이션과 세계화" 나남. 1997/1998

    13 "Research note:Assessing audience performance of public service broadcasters." 17 (17): 227-235, 2002

    14 "Building Public Value:Renewing the BBC for a Digital World" 2004

    15 ". 《현대언론과 사회》. 서울" 1993/1993

    16 ". The Irony of Regulatory Reform The Deregulation of AmericanTelecommunications" 1989

    17 ". Channel multiplicity and programme diversity in television Twosides of the same coin . Studies of Broadcasting" (29) : 92-, 1993

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-07-07 학술지등록 한글명 : 방송문화연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.95 1.95 1.65
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.55 2.384 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼