RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보

    KBS의 변화, 그 현황과 과제 = The change of KBS, its current state and task

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104612375

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
      • URL 복사
    • 오류접수
    인용문이 복사되었습니다.

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    This study explores the background, process and effect, and current state and
    task of the restructuring KBS carried out this August. KBS restructured itself largely
    centering on introducing team management system and adjusting the roles of
    regional network stations. While the former was to change the bureaucratic
    hierarchic structure of KBS to a flatter one, the latter was to abolish seven regional
    stations which had been transmitting only radio broadcasts. As the result of
    restructuring, over nine hundred executive members lost their posts and the
    number of departments became far fewer than before. The change of KBS
    reflected the external demands to be more efficient and the internal desires to
    become more agile and less bureaucratic. As the range and scale of the restructure
    was large, KBS now takes complementary measures to minimize the impact on the
    staff. To secure the intended purpose of the change, the management needs to
    increase social interactions among employees and encourage commitment to
    shared corporate goals. The change of KBS should be directed to provide good
    programmes in behalf of licence payers. As long as KBS is a public service
    broadcaster and is financed by licence fee, licence payers are entitled to ask KBS
    to be cost-effective, to reflect every opinion and every region equally and to
    concentrate on the types of programmes which would not be provided by
    commercial broadcasters. In this sense this restructuring of KBS is not an end but
    a beginning.
    번역하기

    This study explores the background, process and effect, and current state and task of the restructuring KBS carried out this August. KBS restructured itself largely centering on introducing team management system and adjusting the roles of regional ne...

    This study explores the background, process and effect, and current state and
    task of the restructuring KBS carried out this August. KBS restructured itself largely
    centering on introducing team management system and adjusting the roles of
    regional network stations. While the former was to change the bureaucratic
    hierarchic structure of KBS to a flatter one, the latter was to abolish seven regional
    stations which had been transmitting only radio broadcasts. As the result of
    restructuring, over nine hundred executive members lost their posts and the
    number of departments became far fewer than before. The change of KBS
    reflected the external demands to be more efficient and the internal desires to
    become more agile and less bureaucratic. As the range and scale of the restructure
    was large, KBS now takes complementary measures to minimize the impact on the
    staff. To secure the intended purpose of the change, the management needs to
    increase social interactions among employees and encourage commitment to
    shared corporate goals. The change of KBS should be directed to provide good
    programmes in behalf of licence payers. As long as KBS is a public service
    broadcaster and is financed by licence fee, licence payers are entitled to ask KBS
    to be cost-effective, to reflect every opinion and every region equally and to
    concentrate on the types of programmes which would not be provided by
    commercial broadcasters. In this sense this restructuring of KBS is not an end but
    a beginning.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "한국형 팀제를 넘어서" 삼성경제연구소. 1998

    2 "한국방송공사 운영실태 감사결과" 감사원 2004.5.

    3 "프로듀서 선택제에 관한 연구: BBC의 제작문화에 미친 영향을 중심으로." 16 (16): 178-212, 2002a

    4 "제작시스템 혁신 어떻게 할 것인가?》." KBS 프로듀서협회 2003.6.

    5 "정연주 체제의 KBS." (540) : 170-187., 2004.9

    6 "사유화 규제, 민영화 추진 모두 당리당략." 121-124, 2004.9

    7 "방송 수신료의 이론적 검토와 개선방안." 16 (16): 45-74., 2002

    8 "미국에서의 비노조 사업장 노사관계의 전개와 그 함의." 1996

    9 "공룡방송, 폭풍 속으로 뚜벅뚜벅." 2004.8

    10 "What Holds the Modern Company Together?" 133-148., 1996November-December,

    1 "한국형 팀제를 넘어서" 삼성경제연구소. 1998

    2 "한국방송공사 운영실태 감사결과" 감사원 2004.5.

    3 "프로듀서 선택제에 관한 연구: BBC의 제작문화에 미친 영향을 중심으로." 16 (16): 178-212, 2002a

    4 "제작시스템 혁신 어떻게 할 것인가?》." KBS 프로듀서협회 2003.6.

    5 "정연주 체제의 KBS." (540) : 170-187., 2004.9

    6 "사유화 규제, 민영화 추진 모두 당리당략." 121-124, 2004.9

    7 "방송 수신료의 이론적 검토와 개선방안." 16 (16): 45-74., 2002

    8 "미국에서의 비노조 사업장 노사관계의 전개와 그 함의." 1996

    9 "공룡방송, 폭풍 속으로 뚜벅뚜벅." 2004.8

    10 "What Holds the Modern Company Together?" 133-148., 1996November-December,

    11 "The Future of Public Service Television in a Multi-channel Digital Age." 1996.9.

    12 "The Essence of Managing Groups and Teams." Prentice Hall. 1996

    13 "Quality Not Profit," Open Democracy. 2001.5.

    14 "Public Purposes in Broadcasting: Funding the BBC." Luton University Press. 1999

    15 "Leadership and the Psychology of Turnarounds." 81 (81): 67-58, 2003

    16 "KBS 사보" (335) : 2004

    17 "KBS 뉴밀레니엄플랜" KBS 1999

    18 "KBS 경영혁신 프로젝트" 2000

    19 "KBS DCS-프로젝트" 2001

    20 "Inside the BBC and CNN: Managing Media Organisations" Routledge 2000

    21 "Greg Dyke: Inside Story." Harper Collins. 2004

    22 "Building One BBC: Organising for the Future." BBC 2000

    23 "BBC와 CNN: 미디어 조직의 경영" 커뮤니케이션북스. 2001

    24 "BBC Annual Report 2002/2003." BBC 2003

    25 "A Time for Change" 2000

    26 ". 공영방송의 조직개편 한영 비교연구." 16 (16): 294-330., 2002b

    27 ". 공영방송 로컬서비스의 새로운 패러다임." 66-72, 2001.5

    28 ". KBS 내부개혁 움직임." 132 : 5-, 2004.7

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2026 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2017-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2010-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2006-07-07 학술지등록 한글명 : 방송문화연구
    외국어명 : 미등록
    KCI등재후보
    2006-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2004-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 1.95 1.95 1.65
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    1.64 1.55 2.384 0
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼