RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      A Study on Non-finite Subordinate Clauses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106447843

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The present study aims to explore the concepts of finite and non-finite. The term finite means ‘finished’ (from the Latin finitus) or ‘limited’. Traditionally, ‘finiteness’ is concerned with variation for person and number, and is applied to verbs, in which they take on different inflectional forms depending on the person and number of their Subjects. However, in present-day English it makes much more sense to speak of finite and non-finite clauses (or constructions), since the verbal paradigms contain almost no forms with distinct endings. As a generalization we can say that any clause that is tensed is also finite. However, not all finite clauses are tensed. Specifically, subjunctive clauses and imperative clauses are finite, but not tensed. Despite not containing a tensed verb, subjunctive clauses can be considered to be finite because they alternate with tensed clauses, and because they resemble the structure of typical tensed clauses in two respects: they must have a Subject, and they take the same subordinator as some tensed clauses do, namely that[1][11]. We distinguish four types of non-finite clause, namely to -infinitive clauses, bare infinitive clauses, - ing participle clauses, and past participle clauses. Such clauses do not carry tense.
      번역하기

      The present study aims to explore the concepts of finite and non-finite. The term finite means ‘finished’ (from the Latin finitus) or ‘limited’. Traditionally, ‘finiteness’ is concerned with variation for person and number, and is applied ...

      The present study aims to explore the concepts of finite and non-finite. The term finite means ‘finished’ (from the Latin finitus) or ‘limited’. Traditionally, ‘finiteness’ is concerned with variation for person and number, and is applied to verbs, in which they take on different inflectional forms depending on the person and number of their Subjects. However, in present-day English it makes much more sense to speak of finite and non-finite clauses (or constructions), since the verbal paradigms contain almost no forms with distinct endings. As a generalization we can say that any clause that is tensed is also finite. However, not all finite clauses are tensed. Specifically, subjunctive clauses and imperative clauses are finite, but not tensed. Despite not containing a tensed verb, subjunctive clauses can be considered to be finite because they alternate with tensed clauses, and because they resemble the structure of typical tensed clauses in two respects: they must have a Subject, and they take the same subordinator as some tensed clauses do, namely that[1][11]. We distinguish four types of non-finite clause, namely to -infinitive clauses, bare infinitive clauses, - ing participle clauses, and past participle clauses. Such clauses do not carry tense.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Coates, Jennifer, "The Semantic of the Modal Auxiliaries" Croom Helm 1983

      2 Fowler, H. W., "The King's English" Clarendon Press 1931

      3 Close, R. A., "Studies in English Usage; The Resources of a Present-Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis" Peter Lang 1977

      4 Bradley, C. B., "Shall and Will - An Historical Study" Transactions of the American Philological Association 1911

      5 Lakoff, R, "Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society" Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago 229-246, 1972

      6 Bas Aarts, "Oxford Modern English Grammar" University College London 2011

      7 Nadira Aljović, "Non-finite Clauses in English" University of Zenica 2017

      8 Jenkins, L., "Modality in English Syntax" MIT 1972

      9 Jespersen, O, "Essentials of English Grammar" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1956

      10 Christophersen, P, "An Advanced English Grammar" Macmillan 1965

      1 Coates, Jennifer, "The Semantic of the Modal Auxiliaries" Croom Helm 1983

      2 Fowler, H. W., "The King's English" Clarendon Press 1931

      3 Close, R. A., "Studies in English Usage; The Resources of a Present-Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis" Peter Lang 1977

      4 Bradley, C. B., "Shall and Will - An Historical Study" Transactions of the American Philological Association 1911

      5 Lakoff, R, "Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society" Department of Linguistics, University of Chicago 229-246, 1972

      6 Bas Aarts, "Oxford Modern English Grammar" University College London 2011

      7 Nadira Aljović, "Non-finite Clauses in English" University of Zenica 2017

      8 Jenkins, L., "Modality in English Syntax" MIT 1972

      9 Jespersen, O, "Essentials of English Grammar" George Allen & Unwin Ltd 1956

      10 Christophersen, P, "An Advanced English Grammar" Macmillan 1965

      11 Fries, C. C., "American English Grammar" Appleton-Century-Crofts 1940

      12 Poutsma, H., "A Grammar of Late Modern English, 5 vols" Noordhoff 1926

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2019-12-01 평가 등재 탈락 (기타)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2014-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.33 0.33 0.32
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.33 0.32 0.407 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼